<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reference%3A6062</id>
	<title>Reference:6062 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reference%3A6062"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:6062&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-09-17T06:44:44Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.9</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:6062&amp;diff=10319&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Self-audit: trim em-dash overuse in the October 2025 sale paragraph (Slop Cop)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:6062&amp;diff=10319&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-09-17T04:05:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Self-audit: trim em-dash overuse in the October 2025 sale paragraph (Slop Cop)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 04:05, 17 September 2026&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l184&quot;&gt;Line 184:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 184:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Twice, the most expensive Rolex ever sold at auction has been the same &amp;quot;Bao Dai&amp;quot; watch. Bao Dai, the last Emperor of Vietnam, visited Rolex in Geneva during 1954 peace talks and reportedly asked to see the company&amp;#039;s most expensive watch; Rolex produced this black-dial 6062 with baguette-diamond indices. Consigned by a young Aurel Bacs to Phillips de Pury in 2002, it sold for CHF 370,000 against a CHF 200,000 reserve, then reappeared at Phillips Geneva in May 2017 and sold for CHF 5,066,000, reclaiming the title until that year&amp;#039;s record-breaking &amp;quot;Paul Newman&amp;quot; Daytona took it a few months later.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Twice, the most expensive Rolex ever sold at auction has been the same &amp;quot;Bao Dai&amp;quot; watch. Bao Dai, the last Emperor of Vietnam, visited Rolex in Geneva during 1954 peace talks and reportedly asked to see the company&amp;#039;s most expensive watch; Rolex produced this black-dial 6062 with baguette-diamond indices. Consigned by a young Aurel Bacs to Phillips de Pury in 2002, it sold for CHF 370,000 against a CHF 200,000 reserve, then reappeared at Phillips Geneva in May 2017 and sold for CHF 5,066,000, reclaiming the title until that year&amp;#039;s record-breaking &amp;quot;Paul Newman&amp;quot; Daytona took it a few months later.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;In October 2025, a second black-diamond-dial 6062 broke the reference&#039;s own record. This one &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;— &lt;/del&gt;case number 942,536, six diamonds set at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 rather than the Bao Dai&#039;s five &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;— &lt;/del&gt;sold at Monaco Legend Group&#039;s Exclusive Timepieces auction in Monte Carlo for USD 6.2 million, the highest price ever paid for a 6062 and, per Forbes, the third-highest price ever paid for any Rolex at auction. It is one of only three known black-diamond-dial 6062s and had previously sold at Antiquorum in 2006, as part of The Mondani Collection of Rolex Wristwatches, for USD 391,000 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;— &lt;/del&gt;a fifteen-fold increase in under two decades. Hodinkee&#039;s pre-sale preview independently flagged the same lot ahead of the auction, describing it as &quot;the Holy Grail of Rolex&quot; and noting it is one of two known 6062s in this specific diamond layout.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;In October 2025, a second black-diamond-dial 6062 broke the reference&#039;s own record. This one&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, &lt;/ins&gt;case number 942,536, &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;carries &lt;/ins&gt;six diamonds set at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 rather than the Bao Dai&#039;s five&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;. It &lt;/ins&gt;sold at Monaco Legend Group&#039;s Exclusive Timepieces auction in Monte Carlo for USD 6.2 million, the highest price ever paid for a 6062 and, per Forbes, the third-highest price ever paid for any Rolex at auction. It is one of only three known black-diamond-dial 6062s and had previously sold at Antiquorum in 2006, as part of The Mondani Collection of Rolex Wristwatches, for USD 391,000&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, &lt;/ins&gt;a fifteen-fold increase in under two decades. Hodinkee&#039;s pre-sale preview independently flagged the same lot ahead of the auction, describing it as &quot;the Holy Grail of Rolex&quot; and noting it is one of two known 6062s in this specific diamond layout.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Below the headline results, condition and dial originality move 6062 prices more than any particular configuration. Christie&amp;#039;s watch-department head Remi Guillemin, quoted in Hodinkee&amp;#039;s survey of more than 100 documented 6062 sales, put it directly: &amp;quot;It&amp;#039;s about condition more than any specific configuration.&amp;quot; Refinished or service-dial examples have sold for a small fraction of original-dial results in comparable case condition — figures as low as USD 64,000–257,000 against seven-figure results for original dials from the same auction seasons.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Below the headline results, condition and dial originality move 6062 prices more than any particular configuration. Christie&amp;#039;s watch-department head Remi Guillemin, quoted in Hodinkee&amp;#039;s survey of more than 100 documented 6062 sales, put it directly: &amp;quot;It&amp;#039;s about condition more than any specific configuration.&amp;quot; Refinished or service-dial examples have sold for a small fraction of original-dial results in comparable case condition — figures as low as USD 64,000–257,000 against seven-figure results for original dials from the same auction seasons.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key mediawiki:diff:1.41:old-10318:rev-10319:php=table --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:6062&amp;diff=10318&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Remove redundant bottom gallery duplicating images already placed inline/in-section (matches the established per-section gallery convention, e.g. Reference:8171, rather than a repeated master gallery)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:6062&amp;diff=10318&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-09-17T04:04:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Remove redundant bottom gallery duplicating images already placed inline/in-section (matches the established per-section gallery convention, e.g. Reference:8171, rather than a repeated master gallery)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 04:04, 17 September 2026&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l204&quot;&gt;Line 204:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 204:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Rolex itself returned to the concept in September 2026 with the Perpetual Padellone (refs. 53505/53506), a modern annual-calendar moonphase dress watch that officially adopts the &amp;quot;Padellone&amp;quot; name and credits both the 8171 and the 6062 as its ancestors. It sits well outside this wiki&amp;#039;s pre-2020 scope as current production; see the [[Reference:padellone|Padellone family hub]] for that context.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Rolex itself returned to the concept in September 2026 with the Perpetual Padellone (refs. 53505/53506), a modern annual-calendar moonphase dress watch that officially adopts the &amp;quot;Padellone&amp;quot; name and credits both the 8171 and the 6062 as its ancestors. It sits well outside this wiki&amp;#039;s pre-2020 scope as current production; see the [[Reference:padellone|Padellone family hub]] for that context.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;gallery mode=&quot;packed&quot; heights=&quot;180&quot;&amp;gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;File:Ref 6062 hero.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 Stelline, triple-calendar moonphase in an Oyster case|Rolex 6062, triple-calendar moonphase in an Oyster case&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;File:Ref 6062 dial-stelline.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 &quot;Dark Star&quot; — yellow gold Stelline dial|The &quot;Dark Star&quot; — yellow gold Stelline dial&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;File:Ref 6062 dial-detail.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 moonphase detail|Moonphase detail, blue champlevé enamel disc&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;File:Ref 6062 case-flank.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 in stainless steel, Oyster case and screw-down crown|Stainless steel 6062, Oyster case and screw-down crown&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;File:Ref 6062 historical-baodai.webp|alt=The &quot;Bao Dai&quot; Rolex 6062|The &quot;Bao Dai&quot; — twice the auction-record holder for the reference&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-side-added&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Sources ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Sources ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key mediawiki:diff:1.41:old-10312:rev-10318:php=table --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:6062&amp;diff=10312&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: New reference: Rolex 6062 &quot;Stelline&quot; triple-calendar moonphase (Oyster-cased sibling of 8171)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:6062&amp;diff=10312&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-09-17T03:53:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New reference: Rolex 6062 &amp;quot;Stelline&amp;quot; triple-calendar moonphase (Oyster-cased sibling of 8171)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 6062 Stelline}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{#seo:&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Rolex 6062 &amp;#039;Stelline&amp;#039; — Triple-Calendar Moonphase Oyster, 1950-1953 &amp;amp;#124; Rolexopedia&lt;br /&gt;
|description=The 6062 is the Oyster-cased half of Rolex&amp;#039;s only triple-calendar moonphase pair. Waterproof, chronometer-certified, and the source of two of the highest prices ever paid for a Rolex at auction.&lt;br /&gt;
|keywords=Rolex, 6062, Stelline, Padellone, 8171, moonphase, triple calendar, Bao Dai, specifications, reference guide&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Ref 6062 hero.webp&lt;br /&gt;
|image_alt=Rolex 6062 Stelline, triple-calendar moonphase in an Oyster case&lt;br /&gt;
|type=Article&lt;br /&gt;
|og_type=article&lt;br /&gt;
|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[Reference:padellone|Padellone]] › &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;6062&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-lead&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ref 6062 hero.webp|thumb|center|640px|alt=Rolex 6062 Stelline, yellow gold, triple-calendar moonphase in an Oyster case|Rolex 6062 Stelline, yellow gold, triple-calendar moonphase in an Oyster case]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6062 is the Oyster-cased half of Rolex&amp;#039;s only triple-calendar moonphase pair, introduced at the 1950 Basel Fair as the waterproof counterpart to the non-Oyster 8171. Day, date, month, and moonphase share a 36mm case with a screw-down caseback and crown — the same waterproof construction Rolex was building into its sport watches, wrapped around a complication the sport watches never got. Production ran roughly three years, ending by 1953 alongside the 8171. Collectors call it the &amp;quot;Stelline,&amp;quot; Italian for &amp;quot;little stars,&amp;quot; after its most recognized dial: applied five-pointed star hour markers, more common than any of the reference&amp;#039;s other configurations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6062 runs on caliber 655, an automatic movement Rolex built specifically for the model — not the 8171&amp;#039;s caliber A.295 CPL, despite the two sharing a dial architecture, an era, and a family resemblance strong enough that they are still discussed as a pair. It is, by a wide margin, the more expensive of the two at auction. A black-dial, diamond-marker 6062 has twice held the record for the most expensive Rolex ever sold, most recently broken again by a second example of the same configuration in October 2025.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;core-facts&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Core facts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable rp-facts&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! detail&lt;br /&gt;
! value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| reference&lt;br /&gt;
| 6062&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| nickname&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Stelline&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Italian: &amp;quot;little stars&amp;quot;), after the star-marker dial&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| family&lt;br /&gt;
| Padellone / triple calendar moonphase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| production&lt;br /&gt;
| Basel Fair 1950 – c. 1953 (editorial consensus; a Christie&amp;#039;s catalogue essay gives &amp;quot;approximately 10 years&amp;quot; — see Production outline)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| total production&lt;br /&gt;
| under 1,000 across all metals (collector estimates vary; see Production outline)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| case diameter&lt;br /&gt;
| 36mm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| case construction&lt;br /&gt;
| two-piece Oyster, screw-down caseback and crown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| water resistance&lt;br /&gt;
| waterproof Oyster case&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| case materials&lt;br /&gt;
| 18K yellow gold (most common); stainless steel and 18K pink gold (both scarcer, roughly comparable in surviving numbers)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| movement&lt;br /&gt;
| Cal. 655 &amp;quot;Super-Balance&amp;quot; (automatic, in-house, 9¾ lignes)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| complications&lt;br /&gt;
| day, month (twin apertures at 12); date (peripheral pointer); moonphase (blue champlevé enamel disc at 6)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| crystal&lt;br /&gt;
| acrylic, domed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| dial signature&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;quot;Rolex Oyster Perpetual&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;Swiss&amp;quot; (precious metal) or &amp;quot;Swiss Made&amp;quot; (steel, and precious-metal Explorer dials) beneath the moonphase&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| crown&lt;br /&gt;
| screw-down; Super-Oyster (most common) or Twin-Lock&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;what-the-6062-is&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== What the 6062 is ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rolex spent the late 1940s assembling the pieces of the modern Oyster Perpetual — waterproof case, automatic winding, chronometer certification, a date window — without yet combining them into a genuine complication. The 6062 and the 8171 were the answer: a full calendar with moonphase, built in series, at a moment when nothing else in Rolex&amp;#039;s catalog carried anything more complicated than a date. The 6062 is the Oyster half of that pair. Where the 8171 uses a dress-watch snap-on caseback, the 6062 is a true Oyster: screw-down back, screw-down crown, waterproof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That construction is the whole story of why collectors rate the 6062 above the 8171. A Phillips collectors&amp;#039; guide to the reference puts it plainly: the 8171 is &amp;quot;unquestionably a more conventional &amp;#039;dress watch&amp;#039; design,&amp;quot; while the 6062 &amp;quot;offered the best of both worlds&amp;quot; — a complication serious enough for evening wear, in a case ordinary enough for daily use. The 6062 is considered the first triple-calendar self-winding wristwatch built into a waterproof case, and, for Rolex specifically, the only time the company put a complicated self-winding movement inside its Oyster case design.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;stelline-and-the-other-dials&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Stelline&amp;quot; and the other dials ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;packed&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;180&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Ref 6062 dial-stelline.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 &amp;quot;Dark Star&amp;quot; — yellow gold Stelline dial with star hour markers|The &amp;quot;Dark Star&amp;quot; 6062 — yellow gold Stelline dial with star hour markers, oxidized case patina&lt;br /&gt;
File:Ref 6062 dial-detail.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 moonphase detail, blue champlevé enamel disc|Moonphase detail, blue champlevé enamel disc with man-in-the-moon face&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Stelline&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is Italian for &amp;quot;little stars,&amp;quot; the diminutive plural of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;stella&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. It names the reference&amp;#039;s most recognized dial: applied five-pointed star hour markers, more common in the surviving population than any of the 6062&amp;#039;s other dial types. Two generations exist. The earlier version — catalogued by dial-maker Stern as Type 755 — sets a separate lume plot beside each star; the later Type 453 centers the lume inside the star itself. Type 755 turns up across every documented case-serial batch; Type 453 is confined to the earliest batches, serials 690,xxx and 788,xxx.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stelline is one of six original dial configurations. The others are dagger markers, an &amp;quot;Explorer&amp;quot; dial with applied Arabic numerals at 3 and 9 (typically stainless steel, though a handful of gold examples exist, including three pink gold examples among the rarest 6062s known), a pyramid or &amp;quot;Egyptian&amp;quot; marker style confined to the last case batches and the scarcest of the silvered dial types, spade markers, and — rarest of all — a solid black lacquer dial. Seven black dials are documented; three of those carry baguette-cut diamond indices in place of markers, the configuration behind the reference&amp;#039;s most valuable results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Except for the black dials, every 6062 dial is silvered and genuinely two-tone: a matte &amp;#039;&amp;#039;grainé&amp;#039;&amp;#039; center and a smoother, slightly darker outer date track, a distinction that age and patina have generally sharpened rather than erased. A dial that reads as a single flat tone today is the surest sign of a service replacement or a refinish. The signature beneath the moonphase is the other tell — steel dials read &amp;quot;Swiss Made,&amp;quot; precious-metal dials read &amp;quot;Swiss&amp;quot; alone except on Explorer-dial examples, which read &amp;quot;Swiss Made&amp;quot; regardless of case metal. A dial signed &amp;quot;T Swiss T&amp;quot; is a service dial: tritium is a lume material Rolex adopted well after the 6062 left production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The moonphase itself is a blue champlevé enamel disc — the same technique Patek Philippe used on its own calendar watches of the period — supplied, like the rest of the dial, by the Stern family firm (Christie&amp;#039;s catalogue essay names Beyeler as the maker of record, with Stern Frères handling delivery and mounting). A small painted face rides in the moon, smiling faintly at the day and month apertures above it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;the-oyster-case&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== The Oyster case ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ref 6062 case-flank.webp|thumb|right|250px|alt=Rolex 6062 in stainless steel, screw-down crown and Oyster case, Explorer dial|Stainless steel 6062, &amp;quot;The New Standard&amp;quot; — screw-down crown and Oyster case construction, Explorer dial]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At 36mm, the 6062&amp;#039;s case is close in size to a contemporary Datejust or Explorer, not the oversized 38mm dress case Rolex built for the 8171. The construction is a genuine two-piece waterproof Oyster: screw-down caseback, screw-down crown, in either the more common Super-Oyster pattern or, on some examples, a Twin-Lock crown. Being sealed rather than snapped shut has one practical downside collectors run into directly — the case traps dust and haze inside the crystal over decades, and cleaning it is a harder job than popping a dress-watch caseback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Precious-metal cases came from Genex, the Geneva casemaker that began as the case-making arm of bracelet-maker Gay Frères before Rolex brought it in-house; a number 12 struck inside a key, punched on the interior of the caseback, is Genex&amp;#039;s mark. Stainless steel cases came from Spillman, the firm that had built Rolex&amp;#039;s original Oyster case in the 1920s. One case-numbering detail is specific to the pink gold run: some examples were first stamped with a different reference, 6063, before Rolex struck that number through with engraved lines and re-stamped 6062 beneath it — evidence that the pink gold case was, at least briefly, treated as its own catalog entry before being folded into the 6062 line.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;movement-caliber-655&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Movement: caliber 655 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6062 runs caliber 655, an automatic movement built specifically for the model and sometimes called the &amp;quot;Super-Balance 9¾&amp;quot; after its 9¾-ligne dimension. The base movement carries 17 or 18 jewels — 17-jewel examples turn up disproportionately on watches sold into the US market, which taxed higher jewel counts more heavily — rising to 25 or 26 jewels once the calendar module is counted. Every 6062 movement was chronometer-certified. The automatic winding module was reworked specifically to let the day, month, and moonphase correction pushers pass through the caseband without compromising the case&amp;#039;s water resistance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That caliber number is a genuine point of disagreement in the record. Phillips&amp;#039; own 2024 collectors&amp;#039; guide to the 6062 describes the movement as &amp;quot;carried over from the 8171&amp;quot; and calls it &amp;quot;the same self-winding caliber inside&amp;quot; both references. Auction-house lot cataloguing says otherwise: two separate Christie&amp;#039;s lot descriptions and a Sotheby&amp;#039;s lot description for individual 6062 examples all name caliber 655 specifically, and Hodinkee&amp;#039;s dedicated in-depth piece on the reference does the same. Four independent, specific citations naming 655 outweigh one general editorial line describing a shared caliber, and 655 is the reading used throughout this article. The two movements are close relatives from the same in-house programme and the same era — but they are not, on the weight of the evidence, the identical caliber.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;the-8171-and-the-complication-pair&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== The 8171 and the complication pair ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6062&amp;#039;s sibling is the 8171, the non-Oyster dress version of the same complication set, produced concurrently in the same three case metals. Same complication layout — day and month at 12, moonphase at 6, date on a peripheral pointer track — same era, same eventual discontinuation by 1953. The differences are the case and the movement: the 8171 is 38mm with a snap-on caseback and caliber A.295 CPL; the 6062 is 36mm, waterproof, and runs caliber 655.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rolex marketed the 6062 as the &amp;quot;Cosmograph&amp;quot; in its own early-1950s print advertising — a name it would not attach to the Daytona for another decade. Neither the 6062 nor the 8171 founded a lasting line. Rolex replaced both with the simpler Day-Date in 1956, which kept the date but dropped the month display and the moonphase entirely, and the company did not put a moonphase back into a production wristwatch until the Cellini Moonphase in 2017 — more than sixty years later, and outside this wiki&amp;#039;s pre-2020 vintage scope.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;auction-record&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Auction record ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ref 6062 historical-baodai.webp|thumb|right|250px|alt=The &amp;quot;Bao Dai&amp;quot; Rolex 6062, black dial with baguette-diamond indices|The &amp;quot;Bao Dai&amp;quot; — black dial, baguette-diamond indices, twice the record holder for the most expensive Rolex sold at auction]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6062&amp;#039;s auction history is dominated by the black-diamond-dial &amp;quot;Bao Dai,&amp;quot; which has twice held the record for the most expensive Rolex ever sold, and by a small group of named, individually tracked examples that have traded repeatedly over the past two decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Venue&lt;br /&gt;
! Date&lt;br /&gt;
! Lot / watch&lt;br /&gt;
! Material&lt;br /&gt;
! Configuration&lt;br /&gt;
! Result&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phillips de Pury, Geneva&lt;br /&gt;
| 2002&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;quot;Bao Dai&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| 18K yellow gold, black dial&lt;br /&gt;
| baguette-diamond indices (5 diamonds, at 12, 2, 4, 8, 10)&lt;br /&gt;
| CHF 370,000 (a record for the most expensive Rolex sold at auction at the time)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phillips, Geneva Watch Auction&lt;br /&gt;
| May 2017&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;quot;Bao Dai,&amp;quot; resold&lt;br /&gt;
| 18K yellow gold, black dial&lt;br /&gt;
| same watch as above&lt;br /&gt;
| CHF 5,066,000 (again the most expensive Rolex sold at auction, until surpassed months later by the &amp;quot;Paul Newman&amp;quot; Daytona)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Christie&amp;#039;s, New York&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012&lt;br /&gt;
| ex-Gordon Bethune, single-owner sale&lt;br /&gt;
| 18K pink gold, Stelline&lt;br /&gt;
| —&lt;br /&gt;
| USD 590,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Christie&amp;#039;s, Geneva&lt;br /&gt;
| May 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| separate pink gold Stelline, re-lumed with period radium&lt;br /&gt;
| 18K pink gold, Stelline&lt;br /&gt;
| —&lt;br /&gt;
| CHF 800,000 hammer (CHF 975,000 with premium)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phillips, Geneva Watch Auction&lt;br /&gt;
| November 2019&lt;br /&gt;
| ex-Gordon Bethune, resold&lt;br /&gt;
| 18K pink gold, Stelline&lt;br /&gt;
| —&lt;br /&gt;
| CHF 1,940,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Phillips, Geneva Watch Auction&lt;br /&gt;
| November 2023&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;quot;The New Standard,&amp;quot; fresh to market&lt;br /&gt;
| stainless steel, Explorer dial&lt;br /&gt;
| unpolished, non-lume dial&lt;br /&gt;
| CHF 2,117,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Monaco Legend Group, Exclusive Timepieces, Monte Carlo&lt;br /&gt;
| 18-19 October 2025&lt;br /&gt;
| Lot 111, case no. 942,536&lt;br /&gt;
| 18K yellow gold, black dial&lt;br /&gt;
| baguette-diamond indices (6 diamonds, at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11)&lt;br /&gt;
| USD 6,200,000 (a new record for the reference)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Twice, the most expensive Rolex ever sold at auction has been the same &amp;quot;Bao Dai&amp;quot; watch. Bao Dai, the last Emperor of Vietnam, visited Rolex in Geneva during 1954 peace talks and reportedly asked to see the company&amp;#039;s most expensive watch; Rolex produced this black-dial 6062 with baguette-diamond indices. Consigned by a young Aurel Bacs to Phillips de Pury in 2002, it sold for CHF 370,000 against a CHF 200,000 reserve, then reappeared at Phillips Geneva in May 2017 and sold for CHF 5,066,000, reclaiming the title until that year&amp;#039;s record-breaking &amp;quot;Paul Newman&amp;quot; Daytona took it a few months later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2025, a second black-diamond-dial 6062 broke the reference&amp;#039;s own record. This one — case number 942,536, six diamonds set at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 rather than the Bao Dai&amp;#039;s five — sold at Monaco Legend Group&amp;#039;s Exclusive Timepieces auction in Monte Carlo for USD 6.2 million, the highest price ever paid for a 6062 and, per Forbes, the third-highest price ever paid for any Rolex at auction. It is one of only three known black-diamond-dial 6062s and had previously sold at Antiquorum in 2006, as part of The Mondani Collection of Rolex Wristwatches, for USD 391,000 — a fifteen-fold increase in under two decades. Hodinkee&amp;#039;s pre-sale preview independently flagged the same lot ahead of the auction, describing it as &amp;quot;the Holy Grail of Rolex&amp;quot; and noting it is one of two known 6062s in this specific diamond layout.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below the headline results, condition and dial originality move 6062 prices more than any particular configuration. Christie&amp;#039;s watch-department head Remi Guillemin, quoted in Hodinkee&amp;#039;s survey of more than 100 documented 6062 sales, put it directly: &amp;quot;It&amp;#039;s about condition more than any specific configuration.&amp;quot; Refinished or service-dial examples have sold for a small fraction of original-dial results in comparable case condition — figures as low as USD 64,000–257,000 against seven-figure results for original dials from the same auction seasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;collecting-considerations&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Collecting considerations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Condition and dial originality decide 6062 value far more than case metal or dial pattern. A two-tone silvered dial that reads as a single flat shade today has likely been refinished or replaced; the &amp;quot;Swiss&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Swiss Made&amp;quot; signature beneath the moonphase, and its match to the case metal and dial type, is the fastest originality check. Service dials are commonly marked &amp;quot;T Swiss T,&amp;quot; a tritium reference that postdates the 6062&amp;#039;s own production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Configuration hierarchy runs black-dial diamond examples at the very top — three known, two of them now seven-figure-plus watches — followed by the other black dials, then the rarer dial types (pyramid, Explorer) and the more common Stelline, roughly in that order, with steel and pink gold both commanding a premium over yellow gold despite yellow gold&amp;#039;s numerical dominance in the surviving population. Because the case is a sealed, screw-down Oyster rather than a snap-on dress back, service history matters more here than on the 8171: a caseback that has never been opened, with sharp, unpolished case lines and crisp numbering between the lugs, is the strongest originality signal a 6062 can offer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 8171 is the 6062&amp;#039;s non-Oyster sibling — same complication set, same era, different case and a different in-house movement (caliber A.295 CPL rather than the 6062&amp;#039;s caliber 655). See [[Reference:8171|Reference:8171]] and the [[Reference:padellone|Padellone]] family hub for the pair together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Rolex Datocompax chronographs (4767, 5036, 6036, 6236) are the chronograph-plus-calendar complications of the same broad era, built on a Valjoux 72C ébauche rather than an in-house automatic caliber. They are not mechanically related to the 6062, but occupied the same complication-flagship ambition in Rolex&amp;#039;s catalog before the company settled on the Submariner, Explorer, and GMT-Master as its identity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Day-Date, introduced in 1956, replaced both the 6062 and the 8171 in Rolex&amp;#039;s catalog — keeping the date complication the market wanted while dropping the month display and moonphase the market apparently did not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rolex itself returned to the concept in September 2026 with the Perpetual Padellone (refs. 53505/53506), a modern annual-calendar moonphase dress watch that officially adopts the &amp;quot;Padellone&amp;quot; name and credits both the 8171 and the 6062 as its ancestors. It sits well outside this wiki&amp;#039;s pre-2020 scope as current production; see the [[Reference:padellone|Padellone family hub]] for that context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery mode=&amp;quot;packed&amp;quot; heights=&amp;quot;180&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
File:Ref 6062 hero.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 Stelline, triple-calendar moonphase in an Oyster case|Rolex 6062, triple-calendar moonphase in an Oyster case&lt;br /&gt;
File:Ref 6062 dial-stelline.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 &amp;quot;Dark Star&amp;quot; — yellow gold Stelline dial|The &amp;quot;Dark Star&amp;quot; — yellow gold Stelline dial&lt;br /&gt;
File:Ref 6062 dial-detail.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 moonphase detail|Moonphase detail, blue champlevé enamel disc&lt;br /&gt;
File:Ref 6062 case-flank.webp|alt=Rolex 6062 in stainless steel, Oyster case and screw-down crown|Stainless steel 6062, Oyster case and screw-down crown&lt;br /&gt;
File:Ref 6062 historical-baodai.webp|alt=The &amp;quot;Bao Dai&amp;quot; Rolex 6062|The &amp;quot;Bao Dai&amp;quot; — twice the auction-record holder for the reference&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6446730 Christie&amp;#039;s — ref. 6062 &amp;quot;Stelline,&amp;quot; 18K pink gold, case 788&amp;#039;629, circa 1952 (ex-Gordon Bethune)]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6185890 Christie&amp;#039;s — ref. 6062, case 916&amp;#039;321, circa 1952, movement Cal. 655]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.sothebys.com/buy/6bf22b7c-9701-4b3d-a526-3a79045e2240/lots/9019b86c-e01d-487d-ac08-3625b0116674 Sotheby&amp;#039;s — ref. 6062, 18K yellow gold, case 942&amp;#039;X08, movement 10&amp;#039;272]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/the-rolex-6062-triple-calendar-moonphase-and-why-it-remains-the-biggest-star-in-all-of-vintage-rolex In-Depth: The Rolex 6062 Triple Calendar Moonphase, And Why It Remains The Biggest Star In All Of Vintage Rolex] — Hodinkee, 2023-10-27&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/christies-geneva-may-2019-restored-rolex-6062-stelline What The Upcoming Sale Of A Restored Rolex 6062 &amp;#039;Pink Stelline&amp;#039; At Christie&amp;#039;s Could Mean For The Vintage Watch Market] — Hodinkee, 2019-05-09&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://phillips.com/article/132514269/rolex-6062-guide-triple-calendar-moonphase-stelline-black-steel The Fine Print: A Complete History Of The Legendary Rolex Triple Calendar Moonphase Ref. 6062] — Logan Baker, Phillips, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomaswojtowicz/2025/10/20/super-rare-rolex-6062-sells-for-record-7-figure-price/ Rare Rolex 6062 Sells For Record $6.2 Million] — Thomas Wójtowicz, Forbes, 2025-10-20&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/auctions-mlg-fall-2025 Auctions: A Live Preview Of This Weekend&amp;#039;s Fall 2025 Monaco Legend Auction] — Hodinkee, 2025-10-16&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://le-monde-edmond.com/rolex-6062-the-stelline-that-went-unnoticed/ Rolex 6062: The stelline that went unnoticed] — Edmond Saran, Le Monde Edmond&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://watchesbysjx.com/2019/10/rolex-6062-stelline-gordon-bethune.html Rolex Unicorns, Part III: Ref. 6062 Triple Calendar &amp;quot;Stelline Gordon Bethune&amp;quot;] — SJX Watches, 2019-10-01&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://monochrome-watches.com/2026-rolex-perpetual-padellone-annual-calendar-moonphase-dynapulse-53505-53506-review-video-price/ The new Rolex Perpetual Padellone, The Return of an Icon now with Annual Calendar and Dynapulse] — Brice Goulard, Monochrome Watches, 2026-09-15&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Padellone]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>