Reference:neanderthal-daytona - Revision history

Admin: site-wide: domain move BezelBase → Rolexopedia (rolexopedia.net)

2026-09-05T00:38:53Z

site-wide: domain move BezelBase → Rolexopedia (rolexopedia.net)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 5 September 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 'Neanderthal' Daytona 6240}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 'Neanderthal' Daytona 6240}}
	{{#seo:		{{#seo:
	\|title=Rolex neanderthal-daytona — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| ~~BezelBase~~		\|title=Rolex neanderthal-daytona — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| Rolexopedia
	\|description=The Neanderthal Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 6240 — the Phillips Daytona Ultimatum 2018 lot presented as the earliest Paul Newman prototype, sold for CHF 3,012,500. Perezcope's 2022 forensic dossier disputes the prototype framing using contemporaneous evidence from the April 1998 Orologi & Market magazine, arguing the dial is a late-1990s construction on a 6238 donor. Both positions remain on record.		\|description=The Neanderthal Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 6240 — the Phillips Daytona Ultimatum 2018 lot presented as the earliest Paul Newman prototype, sold for CHF 3,012,500. Perezcope's 2022 forensic dossier disputes the prototype framing using contemporaneous evidence from the April 1998 Orologi & Market magazine, arguing the dial is a late-1990s construction on a 6238 donor. Both positions remain on record.
	\|keywords=Neanderthal Daytona, Neanderthal 6240, Rolex Neanderthal, Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Perezcope Neanderthal, Paul Newman prototype, 6240 disputed, Orologi Market 1998		\|keywords=Neanderthal Daytona, Neanderthal 6240, Rolex Neanderthal, Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Perezcope Neanderthal, Paul Newman prototype, 6240 disputed, Orologi Market 1998

Admin: Fix hard-rule-10: drop price from intro, already in Auction record

2026-08-11T18:31:04Z

Fix hard-rule-10: drop price from intro, already in Auction record

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 11 August 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	<small>[[Reference:daytona\|Daytona]] -> [[Reference:6240\|6240]] -> '''Neanderthal'''</small>		<small>[[Reference:daytona\|Daytona]] -> [[Reference:6240\|6240]] -> '''Neanderthal'''</small>

	The Neanderthal is a Paul Newman-configuration [[Reference:6240\|6240]] that Phillips sold in 2018 ~~for CHF 3,012,500 including premium~~ as the earliest known Paul Newman prototype. The nickname points to the dial's crude, proto-Paul-Newman look. Perezcope's 2022 dossier disputes the prototype story and argues for a later construction using a [[Reference:6238\|6238]] donor dial. Both readings remain on the public record.		The Neanderthal is a Paul Newman-configuration [[Reference:6240\|6240]] that Phillips sold in 2018 as the earliest known Paul Newman prototype. The nickname points to the dial's crude, proto-Paul-Newman look. Perezcope's 2022 dossier disputes the prototype story and argues for a later construction using a [[Reference:6238\|6238]] donor dial. Both readings remain on the public record.

	[[File:Ref 6240 hero.webp\|thumb\|right\|250px\|alt=The Neanderthal 6240 at Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Geneva, 12 May 2018\|The Neanderthal 6240 at Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Geneva, 12 May 2018]]		[[File:Ref 6240 hero.webp\|thumb\|right\|250px\|alt=The Neanderthal 6240 at Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Geneva, 12 May 2018\|The Neanderthal 6240 at Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Geneva, 12 May 2018]]

Admin: Text audit: voice, clarity, source links

2026-08-09T21:13:47Z

Text audit: voice, clarity, source links

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:13, 9 August 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:
	}}		}}

	<small>[[Reference:daytona\|Daytona]] -> [[Reference:6240\|6240]] → '''Neanderthal'''</small>		<small>[[Reference:daytona\|Daytona]] -> [[Reference:6240\|6240]] -> '''Neanderthal'''</small>

	~~= The Neanderthal (Daytona 6240) =~~

	The Neanderthal is a Paul Newman-configuration [[Reference:6240\|6240]] that Phillips sold in 2018 for CHF 3,012,500 including premium as the earliest known Paul Newman prototype. The nickname points to the dial's crude, proto-Paul-Newman look. Perezcope's 2022 dossier disputes the prototype story and argues for a later construction using a [[Reference:6238\|6238]] donor dial. Both readings remain on the public record.		The Neanderthal is a Paul Newman-configuration [[Reference:6240\|6240]] that Phillips sold in 2018 for CHF 3,012,500 including premium as the earliest known Paul Newman prototype. The nickname points to the dial's crude, proto-Paul-Newman look. Perezcope's 2022 dossier disputes the prototype story and argues for a later construction using a [[Reference:6238\|6238]] donor dial. Both readings remain on the public record.
Line 23:		Line 21:
	== What the Neanderthal is ==		== What the Neanderthal is ==

	~~The Neanderthal, as~~ it appeared at Phillips, ~~had five identifying~~ features that ~~distinguished~~ it from the documented Paul Newman ~~Mk1-Mk4~~ progression:		As it appeared at Phillips, the Neanderthal carried a set of features that set it apart from the documented Paul Newman Mk1–Mk4 progression. The typeface sits between the known Mk1 and Mk2 forms, which is where the working label Mk1.75 comes from, and the block markers lack the outline seen on Mk2 dials. The dial sits in a 6240 host case with screw-down pushers and a pre-1970 serial. Sub-dial geometry is the contested part: Perezcope reads it as closer to 6238 than to 6239 production.

	The ~~Neanderthal has five practical tells.~~

	* Mk1.75 typeface ~~sitting~~ between the known Mk1 and Mk2 ~~Paul Newman~~ forms.
	* A 6240 host case with screw-down pushers.
	* Block markers without the outline seen on Mk2 dials.
	* Sub-dial geometry ~~that~~ Perezcope reads as closer to 6238 than 6239 production.
	* A pre-1970 case serial.

	== The Phillips sale (12 May 2018) ==		== The Phillips sale (12 May 2018) ==
Line 60:		Line 50:
	== The Perezcope dispute (November 2022) ==		== The Perezcope dispute (November 2022) ==

	Jose Pereztroika~~'s November 2022 dossier —~~ "Rolex Daytona 6240 Paul Newman Neanderthal: A myth goes extinct" — disputes the prototype framing. ~~The dossier's central evidence falls into four categories:~~		Jose Pereztroika, writing as Perezcope, published "Rolex Daytona 6240 Paul Newman Neanderthal: A myth goes extinct" in November 2022. The dossier disputes the prototype framing on four strands of evidence.

	=== ''Orologi & Market'' April 1998 ===		=== ''Orologi & Market'' April 1998 ===
Line 68:		Line 58:
	=== Mk1.75 typeface analysis ===		=== Mk1.75 typeface analysis ===

	Perezcope~~'s typeface argument is simple:~~ the printing ~~does not look like~~ a missing pre-Mk1 step~~, it looks like a later attempt to imagine one~~. Font weight, spacing, and stroke endings all ~~read~~ wrong against period Singer dials.		Perezcope reads the printing as a modern attempt to imagine a missing pre-Mk1 step. Font weight, spacing, and stroke endings all sit wrong against period Singer dials.

	=== Sub-dial geometry from 6238 donor ===		=== Sub-dial geometry from 6238 donor ===

	~~Perezcope's geometry argument is that the~~ dial reads ~~more~~ like a [[Reference:6238\|6238]] donor than a true 6239-era Paul Newman dial. On that reading, the Neanderthal is a reworked 6238 dial~~, not a lost prototype~~.		The sub-dial layout reads to Perezcope like a [[Reference:6238\|6238]] donor rather than a true 6239-era Paul Newman dial. On that reading the Neanderthal is a reworked 6238 dial.

	=== Singer stamp comparison ===		=== Singer stamp comparison ===
Line 80:		Line 70:
	== Phillips's position and the Neanderthal's case ==		== Phillips's position and the Neanderthal's case ==

	Phillips ~~did not claim~~ an archive-backed Rolex prototype. The house argued from the dial itself~~: if it did~~ not fit Mk1 production~~, it~~ might belong to a ~~pre-Mk1~~ phase. That is ~~the exact reading~~ Perezcope rejects.		Phillips never claimed an archive-backed Rolex prototype. The house argued from the dial itself, on the logic that a dial which does not fit Mk1 production might belong to a phase before it. That inference is what Perezcope rejects.

	The ~~case itself — the~~ 6240 stainless-steel case with screw-down pushers, acrylic crystal, and acrylic bezel insert — is ~~not disputed. The~~ 6240 production years (1965–1969~~) are period-correct for~~ a pre-Mk1 Paul Newman framing, and the case ~~authentication passes through~~ the standard 6240 verification checkpoints. The ~~dispute~~ is dial~~-specific, not case-specific or movement-specific~~.		Nobody disputes the case. The 6240 stainless-steel case with screw-down pushers, acrylic crystal, and acrylic bezel insert is period-correct, the 6240 production years of 1965–1969 fit a pre-Mk1 Paul Newman framing, and the case clears the standard 6240 verification checkpoints. The argument is entirely about the dial.

	== Why the dispute matters ==		== Why the dispute matters ==
Line 88:		Line 78:
	The disagreement matters because the two readings imply completely different objects. If Phillips was right, the watch rewrites early Paul Newman chronology. If Perezcope was right, the market paid prototype money for a later construction.		The disagreement matters because the two readings imply completely different objects. If Phillips was right, the watch rewrites early Paul Newman chronology. If Perezcope was right, the market paid prototype money for a later construction.

	~~Both positions stay on~~ the ~~record per BezelBase's never-pick-one-truth rule. The~~ market~~'s read~~ on the Perezcope dossier will ~~emerge~~ at the next public sale of the Neanderthal, should it surface ~~— the lot~~ has not been re-catalogued publicly since ~~the~~ 2018 ~~sale~~.		Where the market lands on the Perezcope dossier will only show at the next public sale of the Neanderthal, should it surface. The watch has not been re-catalogued publicly since 2018.

	== Relation to other disputed Daytona variants ==		== Relation to other disputed Daytona variants ==
Line 109:		Line 99:
	== Host reference ==		== Host reference ==

	The Neanderthal is documented as a single example on a single [[Reference:6240\|6240]] case. No other 6240 Paul Newman examples ~~are documented~~ in the published literature ~~— per Rolex's standard production record, Paul Newman dials on 6240 are extremely rare~~, and the Neanderthal is the ~~sole~~ cited ~~example~~ at auction.		The Neanderthal is documented as a single example on a single [[Reference:6240\|6240]] case. No other 6240 Paul Newman examples appear in the published literature, and the Neanderthal is the only one cited at auction.

	~~== Where to go next ==~~

	* [[Reference:6240\|Reference 6240]] — host reference
	* [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman Daytona]] — the disputed dial family context
	* [[Reference:albino-daytona\|Albino Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant
	* [[Reference:unicorn-daytona\|Unicorn Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant
	* [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]] — quick definitions

	== Related references ==		== Related references ==

	* [[Reference:daytona\|Daytona family index]]		* [[Reference:daytona\|Daytona family index]]
			* [[Reference:6240\|Daytona 6240]] — the host reference
	* [[Reference:6239\|Daytona 6239]] — the first Cosmograph		* [[Reference:6239\|Daytona 6239]] — the first Cosmograph
	* [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman dials]]		* [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman dials]] — the disputed dial family context
			* [[Reference:albino-daytona\|Albino Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant
			* [[Reference:unicorn-daytona\|Unicorn Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant
			* [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]]

Admin: Fix markdown residue: 5 '-' bullets never converted to wikitext '*' (rendered as run-on paragraph, not a list)

2026-08-08T21:47:26Z

Fix markdown residue: 5 '-' bullets never converted to wikitext '*' (rendered as run-on paragraph, not a list)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 8 August 2026
Line 113:		Line 113:
	== Where to go next ==		== Where to go next ==

	- [[Reference:6240\|Reference 6240]] — host reference		* [[Reference:6240\|Reference 6240]] — host reference
	- [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman Daytona]] — the disputed dial family context		* [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman Daytona]] — the disputed dial family context
	- [[Reference:albino-daytona\|Albino Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant		* [[Reference:albino-daytona\|Albino Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant
	- [[Reference:unicorn-daytona\|Unicorn Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant		* [[Reference:unicorn-daytona\|Unicorn Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant
	- [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]] — quick definitions		* [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]] — quick definitions

	== Related references ==		== Related references ==

Admin: Move Sources below Related references so the article ends on its Sources footer, matching the sibling reference pages (AGENTS.md).

2026-08-08T17:30:58Z

Move Sources below Related references so the article ends on its Sources footer, matching the sibling reference pages (AGENTS.md).

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 8 August 2026
Line 118:		Line 118:
	- [[Reference:unicorn-daytona\|Unicorn Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant		- [[Reference:unicorn-daytona\|Unicorn Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant
	- [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]] — quick definitions		- [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]] — quick definitions

			== Related references ==

			* [[Reference:daytona\|Daytona family index]]
			* [[Reference:6239\|Daytona 6239]] — the first Cosmograph
			* [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman dials]]


	== Sources ==		== Sources ==
Line 128:		Line 135:
	* [https://monochrome-watches.com/history-rolex-daytona-chronograph-1963-in-depth-review/ In-Depth: The History of the Rolex Daytona] — Erik Slaven, Monochrome, 2024		* [https://monochrome-watches.com/history-rolex-daytona-chronograph-1963-in-depth-review/ In-Depth: The History of the Rolex Daytona] — Erik Slaven, Monochrome, 2024


	~~== Related references ==~~

	* [[Reference:daytona\|Daytona family index]]
	* [[Reference:6239\|Daytona 6239]] — the first Cosmograph
	* [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman dials]]

	[[Category:Daytona]]		[[Category:Daytona]]

Admin: Correct two auction comparison figures: Paul Newman's 6239 realised USD 17,752,500 (Phillips Winning Icons, 26 Oct 2017), not "17.52M"; the Bao Dai 6062 realised CHF 5,066,000, not USD (per deliverables/references/8171). Also: Source list heading -> Sources, and DISPLAYTITLE no longer prints the raw page slug.

2026-08-08T17:29:51Z

Correct two auction comparison figures: Paul Newman's 6239 realised USD 17,752,500 (Phillips Winning Icons, 26 Oct 2017), not "17.52M"; the Bao Dai 6062 realised CHF 5,066,000, not USD (per deliverables/references/8171). Also: Source list heading -> Sources, and DISPLAYTITLE no longer prints the raw page slug.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 8 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex ~~neanderthal-daytona~~}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 'Neanderthal' Daytona 6240}}
	{{#seo:		{{#seo:
	\|title=Rolex neanderthal-daytona — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| BezelBase		\|title=Rolex neanderthal-daytona — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| BezelBase
Line 56:		Line 56:
	\|}		\|}

	The sale placed the Neanderthal at the fourth position on the all-time Rolex auction list at the time, behind Newman's own 6239 (USD 17~~.52M~~ at Phillips Winning Icons, 2017), the Unicorn 6265 (CHF 5~~.94M~~ at the same Ultimatum sale), and the Bao Dai 6062 (~~USD~~ 5~~.06M~~).		The sale placed the Neanderthal at the fourth position on the all-time Rolex auction list at the time, behind Newman's own 6239 (USD 17,752,500 at Phillips Winning Icons, New York, 26 October 2017), the Unicorn 6265 (CHF 5,937,500 at the same Ultimatum sale), and the Bao Dai 6062 (CHF 5,066,000 at Phillips Geneva, May 2017).

	== The Perezcope dispute (November 2022) ==		== The Perezcope dispute (November 2022) ==
Line 119:		Line 119:
	- [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]] — quick definitions		- [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]] — quick definitions

	== ~~Source list~~ ==		== Sources ==

	* [https://www.phillips.com/article/42015509/made-for-racing-rolex-and-the-daytona Made for Racing: Rolex and the Daytona] — Phillips, 2018		* [https://www.phillips.com/article/42015509/made-for-racing-rolex-and-the-daytona Made for Racing: Rolex and the Daytona] — Phillips, 2018

Admin: SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

2026-08-04T00:24:16Z

SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 4 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex neanderthal-daytona}}		{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex neanderthal-daytona}}
	{{#seo:		{{#seo:
	\|title=Rolex neanderthal-daytona — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| BezelBase		\|title=Rolex neanderthal-daytona — Production, Dial Variants, Serial Ranges \| BezelBase
	\|description=The Neanderthal Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 6240 — the Phillips Daytona Ultimatum 2018 lot presented as the earliest Paul Newman prototype, sold for CHF 3,012,500. Perezcope's 2022 forensic dossier disputes the prototype framing using contemporaneous evidence from the April 1998 Orologi & Market magazine, arguing the dial is a late-1990s construction on a 6238 donor. Both positions remain on record.		\|description=The Neanderthal Rolex Cosmograph Daytona 6240 — the Phillips Daytona Ultimatum 2018 lot presented as the earliest Paul Newman prototype, sold for CHF 3,012,500. Perezcope's 2022 forensic dossier disputes the prototype framing using contemporaneous evidence from the April 1998 Orologi & Market magazine, arguing the dial is a late-1990s construction on a 6238 donor. Both positions remain on record.
	\|keywords=Neanderthal Daytona, Neanderthal 6240, Rolex Neanderthal, Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Perezcope Neanderthal, Paul Newman prototype, 6240 disputed, Orologi Market 1998		\|keywords=Neanderthal Daytona, Neanderthal 6240, Rolex Neanderthal, Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Perezcope Neanderthal, Paul Newman prototype, 6240 disputed, Orologi Market 1998
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-19T15:01:32Z		\|published_time=2026-04-19T15:01:32Z
	\|modified_time=2026-06-~~29T01~~:23:~~05Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-07-18T14:18:39Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

Klaudiusz: Internal linking: related references (thematic hub)

2026-07-18T14:18:39Z

Internal linking: related references (thematic hub)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 18 July 2026
Line 127:		Line 127:
	* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/the-first-rolex-daytona-by-benjamin-clymer Historical Perspectives: The Very First Rolex Daytona] — Benjamin Clymer, Hodinkee, 2013		* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/the-first-rolex-daytona-by-benjamin-clymer Historical Perspectives: The Very First Rolex Daytona] — Benjamin Clymer, Hodinkee, 2013
	* [https://monochrome-watches.com/history-rolex-daytona-chronograph-1963-in-depth-review/ In-Depth: The History of the Rolex Daytona] — Erik Slaven, Monochrome, 2024		* [https://monochrome-watches.com/history-rolex-daytona-chronograph-1963-in-depth-review/ In-Depth: The History of the Rolex Daytona] — Erik Slaven, Monochrome, 2024


			== Related references ==

			* [[Reference:daytona\|Daytona family index]]
			* [[Reference:6239\|Daytona 6239]] — the first Cosmograph
			* [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman dials]]

	[[Category:Daytona]]		[[Category:Daytona]]

Admin: SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

2026-06-29T01:24:27Z

SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:24, 29 June 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-19T15:01:32Z		\|published_time=2026-04-19T15:01:32Z
	\|modified_time=2026-06-~~04T04~~:42:~~50Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-06-29T01:23:05Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

Admin: SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

2026-06-29T01:23:05Z

SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:23, 29 June 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|og_type=article		\|og_type=article
	\|published_time=2026-04-19T15:01:32Z		\|published_time=2026-04-19T15:01:32Z
	\|modified_time=2026-04-~~29T02~~:51:~~40Z~~		\|modified_time=2026-06-04T04:42:50Z
	\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large		\|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large
	}}		}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 11 August 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	<small>[[Reference:daytona\|Daytona]] -> [[Reference:6240\|6240]] -> '''Neanderthal'''</small>		<small>[[Reference:daytona\|Daytona]] -> [[Reference:6240\|6240]] -> '''Neanderthal'''</small>

	The Neanderthal is a Paul Newman-configuration [[Reference:6240\|6240]] that Phillips sold in 2018 ~~for CHF 3,012,500 including premium~~ as the earliest known Paul Newman prototype. The nickname points to the dial's crude, proto-Paul-Newman look. Perezcope's 2022 dossier disputes the prototype story and argues for a later construction using a [[Reference:6238\|6238]] donor dial. Both readings remain on the public record.		The Neanderthal is a Paul Newman-configuration [[Reference:6240\|6240]] that Phillips sold in 2018 as the earliest known Paul Newman prototype. The nickname points to the dial's crude, proto-Paul-Newman look. Perezcope's 2022 dossier disputes the prototype story and argues for a later construction using a [[Reference:6238\|6238]] donor dial. Both readings remain on the public record.

	[[File:Ref 6240 hero.webp\|thumb\|right\|250px\|alt=The Neanderthal 6240 at Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Geneva, 12 May 2018\|The Neanderthal 6240 at Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Geneva, 12 May 2018]]		[[File:Ref 6240 hero.webp\|thumb\|right\|250px\|alt=The Neanderthal 6240 at Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Geneva, 12 May 2018\|The Neanderthal 6240 at Phillips Daytona Ultimatum, Geneva, 12 May 2018]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 8 August 2026
Line 113:		Line 113:
	== Where to go next ==		== Where to go next ==

	- [[Reference:6240\|Reference 6240]] — host reference		* [[Reference:6240\|Reference 6240]] — host reference
	- [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman Daytona]] — the disputed dial family context		* [[Reference:paul-newman-daytona\|Paul Newman Daytona]] — the disputed dial family context
	- [[Reference:albino-daytona\|Albino Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant		* [[Reference:albino-daytona\|Albino Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant
	- [[Reference:unicorn-daytona\|Unicorn Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant		* [[Reference:unicorn-daytona\|Unicorn Daytona]] — parallel disputed variant
	- [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]] — quick definitions		* [[Reference:daytona-glossary\|Daytona glossary]] — quick definitions

	== Related references ==		== Related references ==