<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reference%3Apadellone</id>
	<title>Reference:padellone - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Reference%3Apadellone"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:padellone&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-09-17T06:43:13Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.9</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:padellone&amp;diff=10320&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: Self-audit: trim em-dash overuse per paragraph (Slop Cop)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:padellone&amp;diff=10320&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-09-17T04:06:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Self-audit: trim em-dash overuse per paragraph (Slop Cop)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122;&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 04:06, 17 September 2026&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l26&quot;&gt;Line 26:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 26:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;By the late 1940s Rolex had assembled the pieces of the modern Oyster Perpetual — a waterproof case, automatic winding, chronometer certification, a date window — without yet combining them into a genuine high complication. The 8171 and 6062 were the answer, introduced within a year of each other and produced concurrently through 1953. Both share the same complication layout: day and month in twin apertures at 12, moonphase at 6 on a blue champlevé enamel disc, and date on a peripheral chapter ring read by a central pointer. Both were produced in 18K yellow gold, 18K pink gold, and stainless steel. Neither founded a lasting line — Rolex replaced both with the simpler Day-Date in 1956, dropping the month display and moonphase entirely, and did not put a moonphase back into a production wristwatch until the Cellini Moonphase in 2017.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;By the late 1940s Rolex had assembled the pieces of the modern Oyster Perpetual — a waterproof case, automatic winding, chronometer certification, a date window — without yet combining them into a genuine high complication. The 8171 and 6062 were the answer, introduced within a year of each other and produced concurrently through 1953. Both share the same complication layout: day and month in twin apertures at 12, moonphase at 6 on a blue champlevé enamel disc, and date on a peripheral chapter ring read by a central pointer. Both were produced in 18K yellow gold, 18K pink gold, and stainless steel. Neither founded a lasting line — Rolex replaced both with the simpler Day-Date in 1956, dropping the month display and moonphase entirely, and did not put a moonphase back into a production wristwatch until the Cellini Moonphase in 2017.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The two references are not, however, mechanically identical. The 8171 is the dress watch: 38mm, snap-on caseback, no water resistance, running caliber A.295 CPL &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;— &lt;/del&gt;the same movement platform used in the 4467 Big Bubbleback (&quot;Ovettone&quot;)&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, &lt;/del&gt;fitted with a complete-calendar-and-moonphase module. The 6062 is the Oyster: 36mm, screw-down caseback and crown, waterproof, running caliber 655, a &quot;Super-Balance&quot; movement Rolex built specifically for the model. &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Auction-house lot cataloguing for the 6062 — &lt;/del&gt;Christie&#039;s and Sotheby&#039;s lot descriptions and Hodinkee&#039;s dedicated in-depth piece all independently name caliber 655 &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;— is &lt;/del&gt;the better-evidenced reading against a Phillips collectors&#039; guide that describes the pair as sharing &quot;the same self-winding caliber.&quot; Case, water resistance, and movement are what separate them; the complication and the era are what unite them.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The two references are not, however, mechanically identical. The 8171 is the dress watch: 38mm, snap-on caseback, no water resistance, running caliber A.295 CPL&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, &lt;/ins&gt;the same movement platform used in the 4467 Big Bubbleback (&quot;Ovettone&quot;) fitted with a complete-calendar-and-moonphase module. The 6062 is the Oyster: 36mm, screw-down caseback and crown, waterproof, running caliber 655, a &quot;Super-Balance&quot; movement Rolex built specifically for the model. Christie&#039;s and Sotheby&#039;s lot descriptions and Hodinkee&#039;s dedicated in-depth piece all independently name caliber 655 &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;for the 6062, &lt;/ins&gt;the better-evidenced reading against a Phillips collectors&#039; guide that describes the pair as sharing &quot;the same self-winding caliber.&quot; Case, water resistance, and movement are what separate them; the complication and the era are what unite them.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Why the names differ ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Why the names differ ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l34&quot;&gt;Line 34:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 34:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Auction standing ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Auction standing ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;−&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The 6062 is, by a wide margin, the more valuable of the two at auction. A black-dial, diamond-marker 6062 known as the &quot;Bao Dai&quot; &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;— &lt;/del&gt;commissioned in 1954 by Vietnam&#039;s last emperor during a visit to Rolex in Geneva &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;— &lt;/del&gt;has twice held the record for the most expensive Rolex ever sold: CHF 370,000 in 2002, then CHF 5,066,000 in May 2017. In October 2025, a second black-diamond-dial 6062 broke the reference&#039;s own record, selling for USD 6.2 million at Monaco Legend Group&#039;s Exclusive Timepieces auction in Monte Carlo &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;— &lt;/del&gt;the third-highest price ever paid for a Rolex at auction&lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, per Forbes&lt;/del&gt;, and independently previewed ahead of the sale &lt;del style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;by Hodinkee&lt;/del&gt;. The 8171&#039;s own record sits far below that tier: Christie&#039;s December 2013 &quot;Sleeping Beauty,&quot; a stainless steel example with diamond-set numerals, sold for USD 1,145,000, and Phillips&#039; 2019 Geneva pair set the reference&#039;s yellow gold (CHF 980,000) and steel (CHF 1,028,000) benchmarks. Both references reward condition and dial originality over any specific configuration; see each reference&#039;s own Auction record section for the fuller picture.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; data-marker=&quot;+&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;The 6062 is, by a wide margin, the more valuable of the two at auction. A black-dial, diamond-marker 6062 known as the &quot;Bao Dai&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;,&lt;/ins&gt;&quot; commissioned in 1954 by Vietnam&#039;s last emperor during a visit to Rolex in Geneva&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;, &lt;/ins&gt;has twice held the record for the most expensive Rolex ever sold: CHF 370,000 in 2002, then CHF 5,066,000 in May 2017. In October 2025, a second black-diamond-dial 6062 broke the reference&#039;s own record, selling for USD 6.2 million at Monaco Legend Group&#039;s Exclusive Timepieces auction in Monte Carlo&lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;. Per Forbes, that is &lt;/ins&gt;the third-highest price ever paid for a Rolex at auction, and &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;Hodinkee &lt;/ins&gt;independently previewed &lt;ins style=&quot;font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;the lot &lt;/ins&gt;ahead of the sale. The 8171&#039;s own record sits far below that tier: Christie&#039;s December 2013 &quot;Sleeping Beauty,&quot; a stainless steel example with diamond-set numerals, sold for USD 1,145,000, and Phillips&#039; 2019 Geneva pair set the reference&#039;s yellow gold (CHF 980,000) and steel (CHF 1,028,000) benchmarks. Both references reward condition and dial originality over any specific configuration; see each reference&#039;s own Auction record section for the fuller picture.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Renewed attention: the 2026 Perpetual Padellone ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;diff-marker&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Renewed attention: the 2026 Perpetual Padellone ==&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;

&lt;!-- diff cache key mediawiki:diff:1.41:old-10314:rev-10320:php=table --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:padellone&amp;diff=10314&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin: New family hub: Padellone (8171 + 6062 triple-calendar moonphase pair)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:padellone&amp;diff=10314&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-09-17T03:56:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New family hub: Padellone (8171 + 6062 triple-calendar moonphase pair)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex Padellone}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{#seo:&lt;br /&gt;
|title=Rolex Padellone — 8171 and 6062 Triple-Calendar Moonphase &amp;amp;#124; Rolexopedia&lt;br /&gt;
|description=The 8171 and 6062: the only two Rolex wristwatches ever put into series production with a full calendar and moonphase, and the reason Rolex revived the &amp;quot;Padellone&amp;quot; name in 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
|keywords=Rolex Padellone, 8171, 6062, Stelline, triple calendar, moonphase, Bao Dai, vintage Rolex, collector guide&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Ref padellone vintage-ad.webp&lt;br /&gt;
|image_alt=Period Rolex print advertisement for the 6062 &amp;quot;Cosmograph,&amp;quot; showing the triple-calendar moonphase complication&lt;br /&gt;
|type=Article&lt;br /&gt;
|og_type=article&lt;br /&gt;
|robots=index,follow,max-image-preview:large&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Padellone names a pair, not a single watch. The 8171 and the 6062 are the only two references Rolex ever put into series production with a full calendar and a moonphase — day, date, month, and lunar phase, built around the same complication architecture, sold alongside each other from 1949 to 1953 and never revived as a production line again until 2026. &amp;quot;Padellone&amp;quot; itself, Italian for &amp;quot;big pan,&amp;quot; is properly the 8171&amp;#039;s own nickname, earned by its oversized 38mm dress case; the 6062 answers to &amp;quot;Stelline,&amp;quot; after its star-marker dial. Collectors and auction houses treat the two as a single family, and this page does the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ref padellone vintage-ad.webp|thumb|center|400px|alt=Period Rolex print advertisement for the 6062 &amp;quot;Cosmograph,&amp;quot; showing the triple-calendar moonphase complication|Period Rolex advertisement for the 6062, marketed at launch as the &amp;quot;Cosmograph&amp;quot; — a name Rolex would not attach to the Daytona for another decade]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common entry points ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-grid&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card-body&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card-meta&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Holding a non-Oyster dress watch with a snap-on caseback?&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card-title&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Reference:8171|8171]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card-text&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The &amp;quot;Padellone&amp;quot; proper. 38mm, snap-on caseback, non-waterproof, caliber A.295 CPL. The reference the nickname was coined for.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card-body&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card-meta&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Holding a waterproof Oyster with the same complication?&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card-title&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Reference:6062|6062]]&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;rp-card-text&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The &amp;quot;Stelline.&amp;quot; 36mm Oyster case, screw-down caseback and crown, caliber 655. Twice the record holder for the most expensive Rolex ever sold at auction.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What the pair is ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the late 1940s Rolex had assembled the pieces of the modern Oyster Perpetual — a waterproof case, automatic winding, chronometer certification, a date window — without yet combining them into a genuine high complication. The 8171 and 6062 were the answer, introduced within a year of each other and produced concurrently through 1953. Both share the same complication layout: day and month in twin apertures at 12, moonphase at 6 on a blue champlevé enamel disc, and date on a peripheral chapter ring read by a central pointer. Both were produced in 18K yellow gold, 18K pink gold, and stainless steel. Neither founded a lasting line — Rolex replaced both with the simpler Day-Date in 1956, dropping the month display and moonphase entirely, and did not put a moonphase back into a production wristwatch until the Cellini Moonphase in 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two references are not, however, mechanically identical. The 8171 is the dress watch: 38mm, snap-on caseback, no water resistance, running caliber A.295 CPL — the same movement platform used in the 4467 Big Bubbleback (&amp;quot;Ovettone&amp;quot;), fitted with a complete-calendar-and-moonphase module. The 6062 is the Oyster: 36mm, screw-down caseback and crown, waterproof, running caliber 655, a &amp;quot;Super-Balance&amp;quot; movement Rolex built specifically for the model. Auction-house lot cataloguing for the 6062 — Christie&amp;#039;s and Sotheby&amp;#039;s lot descriptions and Hodinkee&amp;#039;s dedicated in-depth piece all independently name caliber 655 — is the better-evidenced reading against a Phillips collectors&amp;#039; guide that describes the pair as sharing &amp;quot;the same self-winding caliber.&amp;quot; Case, water resistance, and movement are what separate them; the complication and the era are what unite them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why the names differ ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Padellone&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is Italian for &amp;quot;big pan&amp;quot; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;padella&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (pan) plus the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;-one&amp;#039;&amp;#039; augmentative suffix, the same diminutive-augmentative pattern that gives the Bubbleback family its &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ovetto&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ovettone&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (little egg/big egg) split. Italian collectors coined it for the 8171 specifically, registering how far its 38mm case stood out against 1950s dress watches running 32–34mm. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Stelline&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;quot;little stars,&amp;quot; names the 6062&amp;#039;s most recognized dial rather than its case — applied five-pointed star hour markers, more common in the surviving population than any of the reference&amp;#039;s other dial types (dagger, Explorer, pyramid, spade, and a rare black lacquer dial). The two nicknames describe different things about different watches; collectors nonetheless use &amp;quot;Padellone&amp;quot; loosely to mean the pair, and auction catalogs for either reference routinely cross-reference the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Auction standing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 6062 is, by a wide margin, the more valuable of the two at auction. A black-dial, diamond-marker 6062 known as the &amp;quot;Bao Dai&amp;quot; — commissioned in 1954 by Vietnam&amp;#039;s last emperor during a visit to Rolex in Geneva — has twice held the record for the most expensive Rolex ever sold: CHF 370,000 in 2002, then CHF 5,066,000 in May 2017. In October 2025, a second black-diamond-dial 6062 broke the reference&amp;#039;s own record, selling for USD 6.2 million at Monaco Legend Group&amp;#039;s Exclusive Timepieces auction in Monte Carlo — the third-highest price ever paid for a Rolex at auction, per Forbes, and independently previewed ahead of the sale by Hodinkee. The 8171&amp;#039;s own record sits far below that tier: Christie&amp;#039;s December 2013 &amp;quot;Sleeping Beauty,&amp;quot; a stainless steel example with diamond-set numerals, sold for USD 1,145,000, and Phillips&amp;#039; 2019 Geneva pair set the reference&amp;#039;s yellow gold (CHF 980,000) and steel (CHF 1,028,000) benchmarks. Both references reward condition and dial originality over any specific configuration; see each reference&amp;#039;s own Auction record section for the fuller picture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Renewed attention: the 2026 Perpetual Padellone ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2026, Rolex released the Perpetual Padellone (refs. 53505 and 53506) — a modern annual-calendar moonphase dress watch in 18K Everose gold or 950 platinum, part of the Perpetual 1908 family. Rolex named it &amp;quot;Padellone&amp;quot; officially, adopting the collector nickname outright, and both Monochrome and Revolution&amp;#039;s launch coverage credit the 8171 and 6062 directly as its ancestors: the new watch pairs a day/month display at 12 and a moonphase at 6 — the same layout the 8171 and 6062 established in 1949 — with a new in-house movement, caliber 7190, built on the Land-Dweller&amp;#039;s caliber 7135 architecture and Dynapulse escapement, plus a new &amp;quot;Haplos&amp;quot; annual-calendar system. It is Rolex&amp;#039;s first return to a genuine calendar complication in more than seventy years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Perpetual Padellone is current production and sits outside this wiki&amp;#039;s pre-2020 vintage scope; it does not have its own reference page here. It is noted on this hub because it is the reason the 8171 and 6062 pairing is, once again, current news rather than a closed chapter of Rolex history — and because Rolex&amp;#039;s own choice of name confirms the collector nickname this hub is built around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Related families ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:pre-daytona-chronographs|Pre-Daytona chronographs]] — the Datocompax chronograph-plus-calendar references (4767, 5036, 6036, 6236) occupy the same complication-flagship ambition of the same era, built on a Valjoux 72C ébauche rather than an in-house automatic caliber.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:bubbleback|Oyster &amp;amp; Bubbleback]] — the 8171 shares its A.295 movement platform with the 4467 Big Bubbleback (&amp;quot;Ovettone&amp;quot;), and the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Padellone&amp;#039;&amp;#039;/&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ovettone&amp;#039;&amp;#039; names follow the same Italian augmentative pattern.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:precision|Precision]] — a different admitted vintage/historical bucket, the non-chronometer Oyster Precision tier running alongside the Padellone pair&amp;#039;s own chronometer-certified production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shared references ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:Serial-numbers|Serial numbers by year]] — date a Padellone-family watch from its case serial&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:Movements|Movement reference]] — caliber A.295 CPL and caliber 655 alongside the rest of the in-house catalog&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reference:Bracelets|Bracelet &amp;amp; clasp guide]] — the 8171&amp;#039;s leather-strap dress fitment versus the 6062&amp;#039;s period bracelets&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6446730 Christie&amp;#039;s — ref. 6062 &amp;quot;Stelline,&amp;quot; 18K pink gold, case 788&amp;#039;629 (ex-Gordon Bethune)]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/the-rolex-6062-triple-calendar-moonphase-and-why-it-remains-the-biggest-star-in-all-of-vintage-rolex In-Depth: The Rolex 6062 Triple Calendar Moonphase] — Hodinkee, 2023-10-27&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://phillips.com/article/132514269/rolex-6062-guide-triple-calendar-moonphase-stelline-black-steel The Fine Print: A Complete History Of The Legendary Rolex Triple Calendar Moonphase Ref. 6062] — Logan Baker, Phillips, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomaswojtowicz/2025/10/20/super-rare-rolex-6062-sells-for-record-7-figure-price/ Rare Rolex 6062 Sells For Record $6.2 Million] — Thomas Wójtowicz, Forbes, 2025-10-20&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://monochrome-watches.com/2026-rolex-perpetual-padellone-annual-calendar-moonphase-dynapulse-53505-53506-review-video-price/ The new Rolex Perpetual Padellone, The Return of an Icon] — Brice Goulard, Monochrome Watches, 2026-09-15&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://revolutionwatch.com/rolexs-future-is-complicated-the-new-perpetual-padellone-family/ Rolex&amp;#039;s Future Is Complicated: The New Perpetual Padellone Family] — Revolution, 2026-09-15&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.fratellowatches.com/what-makes-the-rolex-padellone-ref-8171-so-special/ What Makes The Rolex Padellone Ref. 8171 So Special?] — Robert-Jan Broer, Fratello, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Padellone]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Family Index]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>