Jump to content

Information for "Reference:4925"

Basic information

Display titleRolex 4925 Air-King
Default sort key4925
Page length (in bytes)18,894
Namespace ID3000
NamespaceReference
Page ID1067
Page content languageen - English
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes
Number of subpages of this page0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects)

Page protection

EditAllow all users (infinite)
MoveAllow all users (infinite)
View the protection log for this page.

Edit history

Page creatorAdmin (talk | contribs)
Date of page creation14:39, 1 May 2026
Latest editorKlaudiusz (talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit05:14, 29 September 2026
Total number of edits30
Total number of distinct authors2
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days)20
Recent number of distinct authors2

SEO properties

Description

Content

Page title: (title)
This attribute controls the content of the <title> element.
Rolex 4925 Air-King, c.1945–1950s — Hand-wound Oyster reference | Rolexopedia
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements.
Reference guide to the hand-wound Rolex Air-King 4925, commonly dated from around 1945, with a 34mm Oyster case, Hunter-family movement, central seconds and documented early Air-King dial forms.
Article image: (image)
This attribute controls the content of the og:image element. This image is mostly displayed as a thumbnail on social media.
Ref 4925 hero.webp
Image alternative text: (image_alt)Rolex 4925 Air-King eggshell dial
Keywords: (keywords)
This attribute controls the content of the keywords and article:tag elements.
  • Rolex
  • 4925
  • Air-King
  • Battle of Britain
  • Hunter caliber
  • Air-Lion
  • Air-Tiger
  • Air-Giant
Article published date: (published_time)2026-05-01T14:39:01Z
Crawler mode (robots): (robots)index,follow,max-image-preview:large
Article type: (type)Article
Information from Extension:WikiSEO

Page properties

Transcluded pages waiting for reviewNone