Jump to content

Reference:2240: Difference between revisions

From Rolexopedia
[checked revision][checked revision]
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Add DISPLAYTITLE
Clarify documented case diameter and normalize facts heading
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex 2240 Bubbleback}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Rolex Oyster Perpetual 2240}}
The 2240 is a self-winding Oyster Perpetual in a 32mm stainless steel tonneau case, and it is
the one reference in its cohort that still has a claim to the Bubbleback name once the
evidence is checked. The collector list that put the 2240 into circulation also lists the 1873
and the 2765, and both of those turn out to be hand-wound flat-back Oysters wearing the
Bubbleback's case but none of its mechanics. The 2240 is different: both Antiquorum examples
are described as centre-second and self-winding, on a 9¾-ligne movement, which is the size
Rolex used for its automatic Perpetual calibers and not the 10 to 10½ lignes of the manual
flatbacks.


The thing the nickname actually refers to went undocumented for thirty years. Neither 1995
{{#seo:
catalogue says whether the caseback is domed, and neither of their photographs shows it. A third
|title=Rolex Oyster Perpetual 2240: documented examples and family attribution | Rolexopedia
example surfaced in March 2026 at a general auctioneer in Nottingham, catalogued as a ref.
|description=Two 1995 Antiquorum lots identify self-winding 2240 watches. Their casebacks are undocumented; a later domed-back attribution lacks a visible reference number.
2240 and photographed from the back, and that back is domed. It is the first image of a 2240
|image=Ref 2240 hero.webp
caseback in the public record. It is also one non-specialist house's attribution on a watch
|type=article
whose dial reads only Rolex Oyster, without the Perpetual signature both Antiquorum examples
}}
carry, which strengthens the Bubbleback reading without closing it.


It is still, by some distance, the least seen watch in the group. Three lots exist in the
<small>[[Reference:bubbleback|Bubbleback]] → '''2240'''</small>
public record: two Antiquorum sales in 1995 and one English provincial sale in 2026.
 
<div class="rp-lead">
[[File:Ref 2240 hero.webp|thumb|center|640px|alt=Mat silver dial with applied gold indexes, Antiquorum Geneva 1995|Mat silver dial with applied gold indexes, Antiquorum Geneva 1995]]
</div>
 
Antiquorum catalogued two 32 mm steel Oyster Perpetuals as ref. 2240 in 1995. Both have centre seconds and a self-winding, 19-jewel movement. The entries support the reference’s place among early Oyster Perpetual automatics, but they do not show a reference engraving or caseback. The Bubbleback classification remains probable rather than confirmed.
 
Arthur Johnson & Sons attributed a domed-back Rolex Oyster to ref. 2240 in two March 2026 listings of the same watch. The photographs show the case profile and movement number 31706; they leave the case number and reference engraving out. The dial is signed “Rolex Oyster,” without “Perpetual.” Its case has Bubbleback form, while the reference attribution remains unverified.


[[File:Ref 2240 hero.webp|thumb|right|250px|alt=Rolex 2240 Oyster Perpetual with mat silver dial and applied gold indexes|Mat silver dial with applied gold indexes, the Geneva lot]]


==Core facts==
==Core facts==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable rp-facts"
|-
|-
! detail
! detail
Line 33: Line 30:
|-
|-
| family
| family
| Bubbleback (Oyster Perpetual)
| Oyster Perpetual; Bubbleback classification probable, not fully documented
|-
|-
| production
| production
| 1930s or 1940s; catalogues disagree, no firm years documented
| no documented range; Antiquorum dates individual examples to the 1930s and 1940s
|-
|-
| case diameter
| case diameter
| 32mm
| 32 mm in both Antiquorum records; Arthur Johnson gives no diameter
|-
|-
| case shape
| case shape
Line 45: Line 42:
|-
|-
| case
| case
| polished and satined, screwed back and crown, waterproof
| steel tonneau, polished and satin-finished on the two Antiquorum examples; screw-down back and crown
|-
|-
| caseback profile
| caseback profile
| domed, coin-edged screw-down back on the 2026 Arthur Johnson example; neither 1995 catalogue states it and neither 1995 photograph shows it
| not shown on the Antiquorum watches; domed on the Arthur Johnson watch attributed to ref. 2240
|-
|-
| bezel
| bezel
Line 54: Line 51:
|-
|-
| crystal
| crystal
| acrylic
| material not stated in the catalogues
|-
|-
| crown
| crown
Line 69: Line 66:
|-
|-
| case materials
| case materials
| stainless steel (all three documented examples)
| stainless steel on all three attributed watches
|-
|-
| dials documented
| dials documented
| mat silver with applied gold indexes; mat silver with painted Arabic numerals, bâton radium hands on both; silvered sector dial with applied Roman numerals and gilt leaf hands
| two Antiquorum watches wear different mat-silver layouts; the Arthur Johnson attribution has a silvered Roman sector dial; original fitment unproved
|-
|-
| dial designations
| dial designations
Line 78: Line 75:
|}
|}


==Where it sits in the line==
== Where it sits in the line ==
 
Two details separate the 2240 from the Bubblebacks that get written about. It has centre
seconds rather than the sub-seconds register at six o'clock that the earliest Perpetuals
carried, and it has nineteen jewels against the seventeen of the Cal. 520 and Cal. 620
families that powered the reference's better-known neighbours.
 
That combination places it later in the Bubbleback story than the 1933-era three-piece watches
and squarely among the mature automatics — the generation running on the two-piece Oyster case
that arrived in 1936 with the 3131 and 3132. Centre-seconds Perpetuals of this era are well
attested elsewhere in the family; catalogued 2940 examples carry "luminous filled sword hands,
center seconds", so the layout is not anomalous for the period. It is simply not the layout
most people picture when they hear Bubbleback.
 
Where exactly the 2240 falls inside that window is the problem, and the two surviving lots
make it worse rather than better. Antiquorum dated its Geneva example to the 1940s and its
Hong Kong example to the 1930s, two months apart, in the same year. Both readings stand in the
record. The 1936 start year that circulates for the reference comes from the same unverified
collector list that mis-assigns its neighbours, and has no independent support behind it.
 
==Production outline==
 
The public record for the 2240 consists of three lots. Two are Antiquorum sales from 1995:
Geneva at the Hôtel des Bergues on 22 April, lot 304, and Hong Kong at the Hotel Furama
Kempinski on 14 June, lot 29. A full sweep of the house's archive, which reaches back to 1974,
returns nothing else, and no lot surfaced at Phillips, Sotheby's, Christie's, Bonhams or
Heritage. The third is later and a great deal humbler: Arthur Johnson & Sons, a general
auctioneer in Nottingham, sold one as lot 7287 in a mixed Saturday sale on 14 March 2026,
catalogued in a single line as an Oyster Bubbleback, ref. 2240, with an automatic movement.
 
No lot page published a case number, so no serial anchor exists and no production window can
be constructed from observed examples. No production figures appear in any documented source.
All three documented watches are stainless steel; whether Rolex built the 2240 in gold, gold
shell or two-tone, as it did across much of the contemporary range, is unknown.


There is a plausible reason the reference is so scarce in the record, offered here as
Both Antiquorum entries describe a 9¾-ligne, 19-jewel automatic movement with centre seconds, and list screw-down backs and crowns. The catalogues do not name a caliber or describe the case as two-piece.
speculation rather than fact. Both Antiquorum sales predate the internet-era auction archives
that most collector research now runs on. The 2026 lot shows the other half of the problem: it
passed through a provincial general auctioneer, described in one line, indexed nowhere that
vintage Rolex collectors habitually look. A reference can stay invisible by selling in the
wrong century or in the wrong room.


==Movement notes==
The [[Reference:1873|1873]] and [[Reference:2765|2765]] are manual-wind Oysters with flat backs in their cited records. Their tonneau outlines resemble the 2240 examples, but the catalogue descriptions distinguish their movements and casebacks.


Nine and three-quarter lignes, rhodium-plated, nineteen jewels, lever escapement,
== Production outline ==
monometallic balance, self-compensating Breguet balance-spring, self-winding, centre seconds.
Both Antiquorum catalogues give that specification word for word, independently, on opposite
sides of the world and two months apart.


The ligne size is the most useful number in the description, because it is the one that
The auction record consists of two Antiquorum lots in 1995 and two Arthur Johnson listings of one watch in March 2026. Antiquorum dated its Hong Kong example to the 1930s and its Geneva example to the 1940s. The catalogues do not publish case numbers. Arthur Johnson recorded a £800 hammer on 7 March and reoffered the same watch on 14 March, when the hammer was £680; the reason for the reoffer is not stated.
places the watch. Nine and three-quarter lignes is the size of Rolex's automatic Perpetual
movements — the lineage running from the Cal. 520 of 1933 through the 620 and its
sweep-seconds successors. The manual-wind flat-back Oysters Rolex was building alongside them
run larger, at 10 to 10½ lignes; all three documented examples of the neighbouring ref 2765
measure in that range. The 2240's movement therefore sits inside the automatic family on its
dimensions alone, which is independent corroboration of the self-winding descriptions rather
than a restatement of them.


Neither catalogue names a caliber, and this article does not supply one. The 19-jewel
These are catalogue dates for individual watches, not a production range. All three attributed watches are steel. None of the cited lots gives a case number that could test its date against [[Reference:Serial-numbers|serial-number guidance]].
centre-seconds configuration is architecturally distinct from the 17-jewel sub-seconds Cal.
520 and Cal. 620 that powered the earlier Bubblebacks, and it would be easy to reason from
that to a specific sweep-seconds caliber. No documented source makes that attribution for the
# The ligne size, the jewel count, the escapement, the balance and the seconds layout are
what the record supports.


==Dial map==
== Movement notes ==


[[File:Ref 2240 dial-variant-painted-arabic.webp|thumb|right|250px|alt=Rolex 2240 mat silver dial with painted Arabic numerals at every hour|Painted Arabic numerals and outer minute track, the Hong Kong lot]]
Antiquorum describes the 9¾-ligne movement as rhodium-plated, with 19 jewels, lever escapement, monometallic balance, self-compensating Breguet balance-spring and centre seconds. Both entries call it self-winding. The catalogues do not supply a caliber number.


Three dials are documented, one per lot, and the sale photographs confirm all three.
A centre-seconds 600-series Perpetual, such as Cal. 630, is a possible identification, not a confirmed one. Arthur Johnson’s photographs show movement number 31706 but no caliber marking. The watch’s reference engraving is also outside the published views.


The Geneva example carries a mat silver dial with applied gold indexes and radium-filled
== Dial map ==
bâton hands, reading Oyster Perpetual below the coronet and carrying its chronometer
designation above six o'clock. The Hong Kong example is the more obviously pre-war of the
two: mat silver again, but with painted Arabic numerals at every hour, an outer minute track
with five-minute markers, Chronomètre above six, and the same radium-filled bâton hands.


[[File:Ref 2240 dial-variant-roman.webp|thumb|right|250px|alt=Rolex 2240 silvered sector dial with applied Roman numerals and gilt leaf hands|Applied Roman numerals on a sector-style dial signed Rolex Oyster, the Nottingham lot]]
The three attributed watches have different dials. The auction photographs document each watch as catalogued; they do not establish original delivery configuration.


The Nottingham watch is the outlier, and the way it differs matters more than the way it
The Geneva example has a mat-silver dial with applied gold indexes and radium-filled bâton hands. “Oyster Perpetual” appears below the coronet, with “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” above six o’clock. The Hong Kong example is also mat silver, with painted Arabic numerals at every hour, an outer minute track with five-minute markers, “Chronomètre” above six, and bâton hands described by Antiquorum as radium-filled.
looks. Its dial is silvered with a faint sector pattern, applied Roman numerals at the even
hours and applied batons at the odd ones, a printed outer minute track, gilt leaf hands and a
centre seconds hand. The surface is heavily crazed and plainly unrestored. What it does not
carry is the word Perpetual: the signature reads Rolex Oyster and nothing else, where both
Antiquorum dials name the watch an Oyster Perpetual and give a chronometer designation.
Rolex's self-winding watches of this period almost always say so on the dial, so an original
Rolex Oyster dial on a watch sold as an automatic 2240 is a genuine discrepancy and is
recorded here as one.


Applied indexes against painted Arabics is a real stylistic split and not a cataloguing quirk,
The Nottingham watch has a silvered dial with a faint sector pattern, applied Roman numerals at even hours and batons at odd hours, a printed outer minute track, gilt leaf hands and centre seconds. Its dial surface is heavily crazed. The signature reads “Rolex Oyster.”
and it maps onto the two dating readings the catalogues give: the painted-Arabic Hong Kong
watch reads as the earlier of the pair. Three examples is not enough to call that a production
sequence, but it is enough to say the reference was built with more than one dial treatment.


One detail on the Geneva dial deserves a flag rather than a conclusion. Its lot title gives
Rolex’s 2021 brochure dates the phrase “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” to the late 1950s, when it first appeared on Datejust and Day-Date dials. Antiquorum dates the Geneva watch to the 1940s, so its dial inscription and catalogue date conflict. The available lot images do not resolve whether the dial was replaced or refinished, or whether the watch was misdated.
the designation as Superlative Chronometer, Officially Certified, wording generally associated
with a later period than the 1940s that the same lot assigns the watch. That could point to a
later example, a replacement dial, or simply Antiquorum paraphrasing in the title. The
chronology of Rolex's shift between the two chronometer designations has not been checked
against independent sources here, so nothing is concluded from it.


==Case, bezel, crystal, and crown==
<gallery mode="packed" heights="180">
File:Ref 2240 dial-variant-painted-arabic.webp|alt=Mat-silver Rolex dial with painted Arabic numerals at every hour and outer minute track, Antiquorum Hong Kong lot 29|Hong Kong lot: painted Arabic numerals
File:Ref 2240 dial-variant-roman.webp|alt=Silvered Rolex dial with applied Roman numerals and batons, sector track and gilt leaf hands, Arthur Johnson lot 7287|Arthur Johnson listing: Roman sector dial
</gallery>


Stainless steel, tonneau-shaped, 32mm, polished and satin-finished, with screwed back and
== Case, bezel, crystal, and crown ==
screw-down crown. Smooth polished bezel and an acrylic crystal, as the era requires. The Hong
Kong catalogue adds one word the Geneva one does not: it calls the case massive, Antiquorum's
term for a case with real substance to it.


The caseback was the open question for thirty years, and it is the one that matters most.
Antiquorum describes both watches as 32 mm steel tonneau cases with polished and satin finishes, screwed backs and crowns. Its catalogue calls them waterproof. The listings do not specify the crystal material or internal case construction.
Neither 1995 catalogue states whether it is domed. Both give the case description in full and
both stop at "screwed back and crown". The two Antiquorum photographs are front three-quarter
views on leather straps, and neither shows the back at all.


[[File:Ref 2240 caseback.webp|thumb|right|300px|alt=Domed coin-edged screw-down caseback of a Rolex 2240 on a black leather strap|The domed, coin-edged screw-down back of the Nottingham example, the first 2240 caseback photographed in the public record]]
[[File:Ref 2240 caseback.webp|thumb|right|300px|alt=Domed coin-edged screw-down caseback of a Rolex attributed to reference 2240|Domed, coin-edged screw-down back on the Arthur Johnson watch attributed to ref. 2240; no reference engraving was shown]]


The Nottingham sale turned the watch over. Its fifth photograph is a caseback view, and the
The Arthur Johnson photographs show a pronounced domed back in a coin-edged screw ring. The auctioneer reports that its crown does not screw down. The case number and reference engraving are not visible, so these features cannot be assigned securely to ref. 2240.
back is a pronounced dome seated inside a coin-edged screw ring, the profile the nickname
describes. The crown stands proud of the case in the same frame, which fits the one condition
note the lot carried: the crown would not screw down and wanted attention.


That earlier silence was never as damning as it looked, because the catalogues of the period
Christie’s technical catalogue for a ref. 2764 calls it a Bubbleback without describing the back profile. That wording is a useful comparison for auction descriptions; it does not establish the 2240’s case construction or caliber.
do not describe caseback doming even when the watch is unambiguously a Bubbleback. Christie's
catalogued a ref 2764 as an Oyster Perpetual Bubble Back in the lot title and then described
it in body text as a 9¾-ligne, 19-jewel, sweep-seconds movement in a two-part 32mm case with a
domed crystal and a screw-down back and crown. The only thing domed in that description is the
crystal. Strip the title away and it reads exactly like the two Antiquorum 2240 lots. The formula does
not discriminate, which means the 2240's description is consistent with a Bubbleback and
simply fails to settle the question.


Everything else points the same way. That Christie's 2764 specification — 9¾ lignes, nineteen
== Bracelets, end links, and clasps ==
jewels, sweep seconds, 32mm, screw-down back — is the 2240's specification line for line. And
the flat-backed automatics that make self-winding an insufficient test are a later development
in the 6000-series references, arriving once Rolex had slimmed the calibers enough to drop the
bulge. A 32mm self-winding tonneau Oyster running a 9¾-ligne movement in the late 1930s or
1940s sits before that change.


So the reasonable reading is that the 2240 is a Bubbleback, and there is now a photograph of a
The cited photographs show all three attributed watches on leather straps. They do not document a factory bracelet or end-link fitment for ref. 2240.
domed back on a watch catalogued as one. The reading is better supported than it was and still
short of settled. That photograph comes from a general auctioneer running a mixed Saturday
sale, not from a watch specialist; no case number was published to anchor the attribution
independently; and the same watch wears a Rolex Oyster dial without the Perpetual signature
both Antiquorum examples carry. A specialist cataloguing of that watch, or a case number,
would close the question.


==Bracelets, end links, and clasps==
== Auction record ==
 
Nothing is documented. Neither lot was sold on a Rolex bracelet, and no period fitment for the
reference appears anywhere in the surfaced record.
 
==Auction record==


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 254: Line 149:
| HKD 15,000–18,000 (USD 2,000–2,200)
| HKD 15,000–18,000 (USD 2,000–2,200)
| Not published
| Not published
|-
| Arthur Johnson & Sons, Nottingham
| 2026-03-07
| 7353
| Not dated
| Silvered sector, applied Roman numerals, gilt leaf hands
| Not published
| GBP 800 hammer recorded; reoffered one week later
|-
|-
| Arthur Johnson & Sons, Nottingham (The Saturday Auctions)
| Arthur Johnson & Sons, Nottingham (The Saturday Auctions)
Line 264: Line 167:
|}
|}


Neither Antiquorum lot page carries a realised price, so for thirty years the reference had no
Antiquorum publishes estimates but no realised prices for its two lots. Arthur Johnson’s photographs show the same watch in both March listings: lot 7353 on 7 March and lot 7287 one week later. The reported £800 and £680 hammers belong to successive listings of one object.
auction result on record at all. What it had instead was two estimates set within about ten
percent of each other by the same house in the same year, on two continents, roughly USD
2,000–2,400 either way. The single realised figure the reference now has is the GBP 680 hammer
at Nottingham in 2026, which prices a worn, unrestored watch with a crown fault in a sale that
was not looking for a Rolex collector. Three data points spread over thirty-one years, two of
them unrealised estimates, do not describe a market, and no attempt to read one is made here.


What the three lots do establish is narrower and more useful: that the reference exists, that
The two Antiquorum catalogues identify separate ref. 2240 watches with self-winding, 9¾-ligne, 19-jewel movements and centre seconds. Arthur Johnson’s lot records a domed-back watch attributed to ref. 2240; the published views do not verify that reference.
the two specialist-catalogued examples are self-winding on a 9¾-ligne movement with centre
seconds and nineteen jewels in a 32mm steel case, that it appeared with at least three dial
treatments, and that a watch catalogued as a 2240 has a domed back.


== Related references ==
== Related references ==


* [[Reference:2764|Bubbleback 2764]] — Cal. 620N "Super Precision"
* [[Reference:2764|Bubbleback 2764]]: Cal. 620N "Super Precision"
* [[Reference:2940|Bubbleback 2940]] — centre-seconds contemporary
* [[Reference:2940|Bubbleback 2940]]: centre-seconds contemporary
* [[Reference:3131|Bubbleback 3131]] — the 1936 two-piece case transition
* [[Reference:3131|Bubbleback 3131]]: the 1936 two-piece case transition
* [[Reference:2765|Oyster Chronometer 2765]] — the manual flat-back that shares the list but not the mechanics
* [[Reference:2765|Oyster Chronometer 2765]]: the manual flat-back that shares the list but not the mechanics
* [[Reference:1873|Oyster Royal 1873]] — manual flat-back Oyster
* [[Reference:1873|Oyster Royal 1873]]: manual flat-back Oyster


See also the [[Reference:bubbleback|Bubbleback family index]], [[Reference:Movements|movement reference]], [[Reference:Bracelets|bracelet & clasp guide]], and [[Reference:Serial-numbers|serial numbers by year]].
See also the [[Reference:bubbleback|Bubbleback family index]], [[Reference:Movements|movement reference]], [[Reference:Bracelets|bracelet & clasp guide]], and [[Reference:Serial-numbers|serial numbers by year]].
<gallery mode="packed" heights="180">
File:Ref 2240 hero.webp|alt=Rolex Oyster Perpetual with mat-silver dial and applied gold indexes, Antiquorum Geneva lot 304|Geneva lot 304
File:Ref 2240 dial-variant-painted-arabic.webp|alt=Mat-silver Rolex dial with painted Arabic numerals, Antiquorum Hong Kong lot 29|Hong Kong lot 29
File:Ref 2240 dial-variant-roman.webp|alt=Silvered sector-style Rolex dial with applied Roman numerals and batons, Arthur Johnson lot 7287|Arthur Johnson lot 7287
File:Ref 2240 caseback.webp|alt=Domed, coin-edged back on a Rolex attributed to 2240, Arthur Johnson lot 7287|Caseback on the attributed watch
</gallery>


== Sources ==
== Sources ==
Line 291: Line 193:
* [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-118-304 "Rolex Oyster Perpetual, Superlative Chronometer, Officially Certified, Ref. 2240", Antiquorum, 1995-04-22]
* [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-118-304 "Rolex Oyster Perpetual, Superlative Chronometer, Officially Certified, Ref. 2240", Antiquorum, 1995-04-22]
* [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-120-29 "Rolex Oyster Perpetual Chronometre, Ref. 2240", Antiquorum, 1995-06-14]
* [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-120-29 "Rolex Oyster Perpetual Chronometre, Ref. 2240", Antiquorum, 1995-06-14]
* [https://www.arthurjohnson.co.uk/catalogue/lot/350817b99cbeedece0cbed6103e2def4/1d509dfe86f02da2d7cbda445ef6ff1f/the-saturday-auctions-7th-march-2026-lot-7353/ "Arthur Johnson & Sons Lot 7353 — Rolex Oyster 'Bubbleback' attributed to ref. 2240", Arthur Johnson & Sons, 2026-03-07]
* [https://www.arthurjohnson.co.uk/catalogue/lot/666399e1d8d806483b36d5f21241ba50/1d509dfe86f02da2d7cbda445ef6ff1f/the-saturday-auctions-14th-march-2026/ "Rolex - an Oyster 'Bubbleback' wristwatch, ref. 2240, stainless steel case, automatic movement", Arthur Johnson & Sons, 2026-03-14]
* [https://www.arthurjohnson.co.uk/catalogue/lot/666399e1d8d806483b36d5f21241ba50/1d509dfe86f02da2d7cbda445ef6ff1f/the-saturday-auctions-14th-march-2026/ "Rolex - an Oyster 'Bubbleback' wristwatch, ref. 2240, stainless steel case, automatic movement", Arthur Johnson & Sons, 2026-03-14]
* [https://newsroom-content.rolex.com/-/media/project/rolex/newsroom/rolex/rolex-newsroom-int/brochures/en/02_rolex_superlative_chronometer_english.pdf Rolex, Superlative Chronometer Certification brochure, 2021]
* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/the-rolex-bubbleback-and-why-it-still-matters "Buying, Selling, & Collecting: The Rolex Bubbleback And Why It Still Matters", Hodinkee]
* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/the-rolex-bubbleback-and-why-it-still-matters "Buying, Selling, & Collecting: The Rolex Bubbleback And Why It Still Matters", Hodinkee]
* [https://robbreport.com/style/watch-collector/lists/rolex-bubbleback-watches-collector-guide-1931-1950s-1235893131/ "A Collector's Guide to Rolex Bubbleback Watches, From 1931 to the 1950s", Robb Report]
* [https://robbreport.com/style/watch-collector/lists/rolex-bubbleback-watches-collector-guide-1931-1950s-1235893131/ "A Collector's Guide to Rolex Bubbleback Watches, From 1931 to the 1950s", Robb Report]
Line 299: Line 203:


[[Category:Bubbleback]]
[[Category:Bubbleback]]
[[Category:References]]

Latest revision as of 16:51, 11 October 2026


Bubbleback → 2240

Mat silver dial with applied gold indexes, Antiquorum Geneva 1995
Mat silver dial with applied gold indexes, Antiquorum Geneva 1995

Antiquorum catalogued two 32 mm steel Oyster Perpetuals as ref. 2240 in 1995. Both have centre seconds and a self-winding, 19-jewel movement. The entries support the reference’s place among early Oyster Perpetual automatics, but they do not show a reference engraving or caseback. The Bubbleback classification remains probable rather than confirmed.

Arthur Johnson & Sons attributed a domed-back Rolex Oyster to ref. 2240 in two March 2026 listings of the same watch. The photographs show the case profile and movement number 31706; they leave the case number and reference engraving out. The dial is signed “Rolex Oyster,” without “Perpetual.” Its case has Bubbleback form, while the reference attribution remains unverified.


Core facts

detail value
reference 2240
family Oyster Perpetual; Bubbleback classification probable, not fully documented
production no documented range; Antiquorum dates individual examples to the 1930s and 1940s
case diameter 32 mm in both Antiquorum records; Arthur Johnson gives no diameter
case shape tonneau
case steel tonneau, polished and satin-finished on the two Antiquorum examples; screw-down back and crown
caseback profile not shown on the Antiquorum watches; domed on the Arthur Johnson watch attributed to ref. 2240
bezel smooth, polished
crystal material not stated in the catalogues
crown screw-down
winding self-winding
seconds centre seconds
movement 9¾ lignes, rhodium-plated, 19 jewels, lever escapement, monometallic balance, self-compensating Breguet balance-spring. No caliber number published
case materials stainless steel on all three attributed watches
dials documented two Antiquorum watches wear different mat-silver layouts; the Arthur Johnson attribution has a silvered Roman sector dial; original fitment unproved
dial designations "Oyster Perpetual, Superlative Chronometer, Officially Certified"; "Oyster Perpetual Chronomètre"; "Rolex Oyster"

Where it sits in the line

Both Antiquorum entries describe a 9¾-ligne, 19-jewel automatic movement with centre seconds, and list screw-down backs and crowns. The catalogues do not name a caliber or describe the case as two-piece.

The 1873 and 2765 are manual-wind Oysters with flat backs in their cited records. Their tonneau outlines resemble the 2240 examples, but the catalogue descriptions distinguish their movements and casebacks.

Production outline

The auction record consists of two Antiquorum lots in 1995 and two Arthur Johnson listings of one watch in March 2026. Antiquorum dated its Hong Kong example to the 1930s and its Geneva example to the 1940s. The catalogues do not publish case numbers. Arthur Johnson recorded a £800 hammer on 7 March and reoffered the same watch on 14 March, when the hammer was £680; the reason for the reoffer is not stated.

These are catalogue dates for individual watches, not a production range. All three attributed watches are steel. None of the cited lots gives a case number that could test its date against serial-number guidance.

Movement notes

Antiquorum describes the 9¾-ligne movement as rhodium-plated, with 19 jewels, lever escapement, monometallic balance, self-compensating Breguet balance-spring and centre seconds. Both entries call it self-winding. The catalogues do not supply a caliber number.

A centre-seconds 600-series Perpetual, such as Cal. 630, is a possible identification, not a confirmed one. Arthur Johnson’s photographs show movement number 31706 but no caliber marking. The watch’s reference engraving is also outside the published views.

Dial map

The three attributed watches have different dials. The auction photographs document each watch as catalogued; they do not establish original delivery configuration.

The Geneva example has a mat-silver dial with applied gold indexes and radium-filled bâton hands. “Oyster Perpetual” appears below the coronet, with “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” above six o’clock. The Hong Kong example is also mat silver, with painted Arabic numerals at every hour, an outer minute track with five-minute markers, “Chronomètre” above six, and bâton hands described by Antiquorum as radium-filled.

The Nottingham watch has a silvered dial with a faint sector pattern, applied Roman numerals at even hours and batons at odd hours, a printed outer minute track, gilt leaf hands and centre seconds. Its dial surface is heavily crazed. The signature reads “Rolex Oyster.”

Rolex’s 2021 brochure dates the phrase “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” to the late 1950s, when it first appeared on Datejust and Day-Date dials. Antiquorum dates the Geneva watch to the 1940s, so its dial inscription and catalogue date conflict. The available lot images do not resolve whether the dial was replaced or refinished, or whether the watch was misdated.

  • Mat-silver Rolex dial with painted Arabic numerals at every hour and outer minute track, Antiquorum Hong Kong lot 29
    Hong Kong lot: painted Arabic numerals
  • Silvered Rolex dial with applied Roman numerals and batons, sector track and gilt leaf hands, Arthur Johnson lot 7287
    Arthur Johnson listing: Roman sector dial

Case, bezel, crystal, and crown

Antiquorum describes both watches as 32 mm steel tonneau cases with polished and satin finishes, screwed backs and crowns. Its catalogue calls them waterproof. The listings do not specify the crystal material or internal case construction.

Domed coin-edged screw-down caseback of a Rolex attributed to reference 2240
Domed, coin-edged screw-down back on the Arthur Johnson watch attributed to ref. 2240; no reference engraving was shown

The Arthur Johnson photographs show a pronounced domed back in a coin-edged screw ring. The auctioneer reports that its crown does not screw down. The case number and reference engraving are not visible, so these features cannot be assigned securely to ref. 2240.

Christie’s technical catalogue for a ref. 2764 calls it a Bubbleback without describing the back profile. That wording is a useful comparison for auction descriptions; it does not establish the 2240’s case construction or caliber.

Bracelets, end links, and clasps

The cited photographs show all three attributed watches on leather straps. They do not document a factory bracelet or end-link fitment for ref. 2240.

Auction record

Venue Date Lot Dated by catalogue Dial Estimate Result
Antiquorum, Geneva (Hôtel des Bergues) 1995-04-22 304 1940s Mat silver, applied gold indexes, bâton radium hands CHF 2,600–2,800 (USD 2,200–2,400) Not published
Antiquorum, Hong Kong (Hotel Furama Kempinski) 1995-06-14 29 1930s Mat silver, painted Arabic numerals, bâton radium hands HKD 15,000–18,000 (USD 2,000–2,200) Not published
Arthur Johnson & Sons, Nottingham 2026-03-07 7353 Not dated Silvered sector, applied Roman numerals, gilt leaf hands Not published GBP 800 hammer recorded; reoffered one week later
Arthur Johnson & Sons, Nottingham (The Saturday Auctions) 2026-03-14 7287 Not dated Silvered sector, applied Roman numerals, gilt leaf hands Not published GBP 680 hammer

Antiquorum publishes estimates but no realised prices for its two lots. Arthur Johnson’s photographs show the same watch in both March listings: lot 7353 on 7 March and lot 7287 one week later. The reported £800 and £680 hammers belong to successive listings of one object.

The two Antiquorum catalogues identify separate ref. 2240 watches with self-winding, 9¾-ligne, 19-jewel movements and centre seconds. Arthur Johnson’s lot records a domed-back watch attributed to ref. 2240; the published views do not verify that reference.

Related references

See also the Bubbleback family index, movement reference, bracelet & clasp guide, and serial numbers by year.


  • Rolex Oyster Perpetual with mat-silver dial and applied gold indexes, Antiquorum Geneva lot 304
    Geneva lot 304
  • Mat-silver Rolex dial with painted Arabic numerals, Antiquorum Hong Kong lot 29
    Hong Kong lot 29
  • Silvered sector-style Rolex dial with applied Roman numerals and batons, Arthur Johnson lot 7287
    Arthur Johnson lot 7287
  • Domed, coin-edged back on a Rolex attributed to 2240, Arthur Johnson lot 7287
    Caseback on the attributed watch

Sources

Retrieved from "https://rolexopedia.net/index.php?title=Reference:2240&oldid=12246"