Reference:6694: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Prose review: remove research commentary, inflated claims and repetitive phrasing |
Correct 6426 comparison and production-date wording |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<div class="rp-lead"> | <div class="rp-lead"> | ||
[[File: | [[File:Ref_6694_hero.webp|thumb|center|640px|alt=Rolex 6694|Rolex 6694]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
The 6694 is the last of the four manual-wind Oysterdate references and | The 6694 is the last of the four manual-wind Oysterdate references and one of the longest-running manual-wind Oysterdate references. A 34 mm steel Oyster, a date at three under a cyclops, a hand-wound Rolex caliber from the 1200 family, and no rotor — that is the whole watch. Documented examples run from about 1959 to about 1986, and new old stock was still leaving authorised dealers in 1989. It was sold in several case and dial configurations, including steel, plated and capped examples. | ||
Auction catalogues sometimes misidentify the winding system on this reference. Several auction entries use “automatic” in a title or prose line while their movement fields identify manual calibers, including the Christie’s lot whose specification states manual caliber 1225. The reference has also acquired a distinction it cannot support — that it was the last manual-wind Rolex ever made — which Rolex's own product pages refute. These claims recur in auction and dealer descriptions. | |||
==Core facts== | ==Core facts== | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
The Oysterdate ran as a four-reference sequence — 6094, then 6294, then 6494, then 6694 — and the 6694 outlived the other three put together. The introduction is usually given as 1958, replacing the 6094 and 6494, but that date rests on dealer and marketplace copy with no primary citation behind it, and one collector-forum account offered explicitly as belief rather than documentation. The 1958 introduction has not been confirmed from a period Rolex catalogue. What can be shown is that the earliest example whose case number agrees with its catalogue date is a 1959 watch. | The Oysterdate ran as a four-reference sequence — 6094, then 6294, then 6494, then 6694 — and the 6694 outlived the other three put together. The introduction is usually given as 1958, replacing the 6094 and 6494, but that date rests on dealer and marketplace copy with no primary citation behind it, and one collector-forum account offered explicitly as belief rather than documentation. The 1958 introduction has not been confirmed from a period Rolex catalogue. What can be shown is that the earliest example whose case number agrees with its catalogue date is a 1959 watch. | ||
[[File:Ref 6694 with 6426.webp|thumb|right|280px|alt=A Rolex Oyster 6426 and an Oysterdate 6694 in stainless steel shown side by side on leather straps| | [[File:Ref 6694 with 6426.webp|thumb|right|280px|alt=A Rolex Oyster 6426 and an Oysterdate 6694 in stainless steel shown side by side on leather straps|A no-date Oyster Precision 6426 and date-equipped Oysterdate Precision 6694, catalogued together by Antiquorum.]] | ||
Two | Two related manual-wind Oysters sit beside the 6694. The 6426 has no date; the 6694 adds one. Auction catalogues identify overlapping calibres across these references, so the date alone does not identify the movement. Antiquorum has offered a 6426 and a 6694 together as a pair. The other useful comparison is the automatic Oyster Perpetual Date 1500, 1501 and 1503, a 34 mm steel Oyster with a date and cyclops. Its calibres are 1560, 1565 and 1570, and it is a more plausible source for auction-title confusion about winding. | ||
==Production outline== | ==Production outline== | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
Rolex sold manual-wind watches for roughly a quarter century after the 6694 left the catalogue. Its own product pages for the Cellini Rolex Prince, live through December 2014, carry a section headed "Wound by hand" and read: "The Prince features a manually-wound mechanical movement - the 7040 calibre - specially developed and manufactured by Rolex." The specification block on the same pages gives "Manually wound mechanical movement" and "Calibre 7040, Manufacture Rolex". That is the manufacturer describing current production, and it settles the point. | Rolex sold manual-wind watches for roughly a quarter century after the 6694 left the catalogue. Its own product pages for the Cellini Rolex Prince, live through December 2014, carry a section headed "Wound by hand" and read: "The Prince features a manually-wound mechanical movement - the 7040 calibre - specially developed and manufactured by Rolex." The specification block on the same pages gives "Manually wound mechanical movement" and "Calibre 7040, Manufacture Rolex". That is the manufacturer describing current production, and it settles the point. | ||
Phillips dates a 6426 case, R492,864, to circa 1987; the latest cited 6694 cases are dated circa 1986. These are dates assigned to individual watches, not factory production endpoints. The two references share an Oyster case family and manual 1200-series movements, though auction catalogues give overlapping caliber attributions. The evidence leaves open which manual-wind Oyster reference ended later. | |||
==Movement notes== | ==Movement notes== | ||
| Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
<gallery mode="packed" heights="180"> | <gallery mode="packed" heights="180"> | ||
File:Ref 6694 black dial.webp|alt=Black-dial Rolex Oysterdate 6694 on a steel Oyster bracelet|Case 2943776, sold with its dated guarantee and swing tag. The lot title calls it automatic; the movement field on the same page reads 17-jewel manual wind. | File:Ref 6694 black dial.webp|alt=Black-dial Rolex Oysterdate 6694 on a steel Oyster bracelet|Case 2943776, sold with its dated guarantee and swing tag. The lot title calls it automatic; the movement field on the same page reads 17-jewel manual wind. | ||
File:Ref 6694 caseback.webp|alt=Flat screw-down caseback of a Rolex 6694 on its Oyster bracelet and folding clasp|The back of case 2 083 433. A rotor needs a domed caseback to turn under; every 6694 back in the auction record is flat. | File:Ref 6694 caseback.webp|alt=Flat screw-down caseback of a Rolex 6694 on its Oyster bracelet and folding clasp|The back of case 2 083 433. A rotor needs a domed caseback to turn under; every 6694 back in the auction record is flat. | ||
| Line 220: | Line 219: | ||
<gallery mode="packed" heights="180"> | <gallery mode="packed" heights="180"> | ||
File:Ref 6694 blue dial.webp|alt=Rolex Oysterdate Precision 6694 with a blue dial on a folded-link steel bracelet|A blue dial on case 2730705, circa 1971, caliber 1225, on a folded 7835 bracelet with 357 end links. | File:Ref 6694 blue dial.webp|alt=Rolex Oysterdate Precision 6694 with a blue dial on a folded-link steel bracelet|A blue dial on case 2730705, circa 1971, caliber 1225, on a folded 7835 bracelet with 357 end links. | ||
File:Ref 6694 tropical dial.webp|alt=Rolex Oysterdate 6694 with a gilt dial that has aged to brown, on a riveted steel bracelet|A tropical gilt dial on case 828496: the printing has turned brown with age rather than leaving the factory that colour. On a riveted 7205 bracelet with 61 end links. | File:Ref 6694 tropical dial.webp|alt=Rolex Oysterdate 6694 with a gilt dial that has aged to brown, on a riveted steel bracelet|A tropical gilt dial on case 828496 (Antiquorum Hong Kong sale 343, lot 323): the printing has turned brown with age rather than leaving the factory that colour. On a riveted 7205 bracelet with 61 end links. | ||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Case 828496's identity remains unsettled. Antiquorum catalogues it as a 6694, and the pictured dial reads 'Oysterdate' and shows a date. Its caseback photograph reads 6426. The related references use the Oyster case design, so a caseback change is possible; a catalogue mismatch is also possible. The record does not distinguish between them, and the watch should not be used as a clean 6694 example without further authentication. | |||
Markers run from applied faceted gilt chevrons and arrowheads on the earliest watches to the applied polished batons that dominate the middle and late run. Hands follow: dauphine early, then pointed batons with luminous inserts as the standard, with gilt daggers, alpha and — on at least one catalogued example — Mercedes hands appearing across the range. | Markers run from applied faceted gilt chevrons and arrowheads on the earliest watches to the applied polished batons that dominate the middle and late run. Hands follow: dauphine early, then pointed batons with luminous inserts as the standard, with gilt daggers, alpha and — on at least one catalogued example — Mercedes hands appearing across the range. | ||
| Line 287: | Line 288: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Phillips does the most careful work on these. On the Yemen dial it notes that the arms shown are the coat of arms of North Yemen used from 1974 to 1990, "which is correct for the date of this watch" — the kind of internal check that separates a documented special order from a decorated dial. On the Kuwaiti example its research "suggests that this watch was made to commemorate the independence of Kuwait". One Sotheby's entry | Phillips does the most careful work on these. On the Yemen dial it notes that the arms shown are the coat of arms of North Yemen used from 1974 to 1990, "which is correct for the date of this watch" — the kind of internal check that separates a documented special order from a decorated dial. On the Kuwaiti example its research "suggests that this watch was made to commemorate the independence of Kuwait". One Sotheby's entry contains an inconsistency: it describes a "UAE enamel logo" on a watch it also identifies as a King Abdulaziz University gift, a Saudi institution. | ||
Retailer signing is thinner but real. Tiffany & Co. dials are documented at two houses — an Antiquorum example sold with its original Tiffany presentation box, and a run of five from a single collection at Sotheby's. | Retailer signing is thinner but real. Tiffany & Co. dials are documented at two houses — an Antiquorum example sold with its original Tiffany presentation box, and a run of five from a single collection at Sotheby's. | ||
| Line 303: | Line 304: | ||
==Case, bezel, crystal, and crown== | ==Case, bezel, crystal, and crown== | ||
The case is a three-piece Oyster, tonneau in profile, with a screw-down back and a screw-down crown. The crown is a single-seal design rather than a two-seal Twinlock, a detail that matters in service — an oversized replacement O-ring is a common reason a 6694 crown will not seat fully. The crystal is acrylic with a moulded cyclops. The bezel is smooth and polished on steel examples, and engine-turned or fluted on the gold-cased variants. | The case is a three-piece Oyster, tonneau in profile, with a screw-down back and a screw-down crown. The crown is a single-seal design rather than a two-seal Twinlock, a detail that matters in service — an oversized replacement O-ring is a common reason a 6694 crown will not seat fully. The crystal is acrylic with a moulded cyclops. The bezel is smooth and polished on steel examples, and engine-turned or fluted on the gold-cased variants. | ||
| Line 346: | Line 346: | ||
The folded-to-solid changeover falls around 1976, so either can be correct on a mid-1970s watch. Leather is common on surviving examples but is usually a later fitment rather than an original delivery — auction descriptions mark these as "associated" more often than not. | The folded-to-solid changeover falls around 1976, so either can be correct on a mid-1970s watch. Leather is common on surviving examples but is usually a later fitment rather than an original delivery — auction descriptions mark these as "associated" more often than not. | ||
Clasp stamps recorded across the Bonhams lots include 2 69, 4 68, 3 63, 2 71, 4 52, S1, S11, N4, M11, G, S U10 and 7835 J2. One of those is instructive: a clasp stamped 4 52 sits on a watch dated to around 1960. A clasp code dates the bracelet | Clasp stamps recorded across the Bonhams lots include 2 69, 4 68, 3 63, 2 71, 4 52, S1, S11, N4, M11, G, S U10 and 7835 J2. One of those is instructive: a clasp stamped 4 52 sits on a watch dated to around 1960. A clasp code dates the bracelet alone, and the 6694 — cheap, common, and worn hard — has had more bracelets swapped between cases than almost any other vintage Rolex. | ||
==Auction record== | ==Auction record== | ||
The | The results below are individual sales. They show how dial, provenance and condition affected those lots; they do not establish a general market range. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 391: | Line 391: | ||
|} | |} | ||
These results span two decades and five currencies | These results span two decades and five currencies. The sale descriptions identify the watches and their documented details; they should not be read as a price guide for every 6694. | ||
Two watches in the record appear twice each, re-offered at the same house within months, which is worth knowing before treating lot counts as population counts. | Two watches in the record appear twice each, re-offered at the same house within months, which is worth knowing before treating lot counts as population counts. | ||
| Line 401: | Line 401: | ||
Match the caliber to the era. A 1215 on an early-1960s serial and a 1225 on anything after the mid-1960s are both period-correct; the reverse combination needs explaining. Match the dial footer too: SWISS alone with radium on the earliest watches, T SWISS T after 1963. | Match the caliber to the era. A 1215 on an early-1960s serial and a 1225 on anything after the mid-1960s are both period-correct; the reverse combination needs explaining. Match the dial footer too: SWISS alone with radium on the earliest watches, T SWISS T after 1963. | ||
Treat any coloured dial as a question | Treat any coloured dial as a question until its finish and provenance are checked. Auction catalogues describe the Mickey Mouse examples cited here as later or refinished dials. Check a stated case diameter against an actual measurement. And read the word "automatic" in a lot title as a cataloguing error, then check the movement field, which will almost always say otherwise. | ||
== Related references == | == Related references == | ||
* Oyster Precision 6426 — | * [[Reference:6426|Oyster Precision 6426]] — no-date sibling | ||
* [[Reference:3003|Precision 3003]] — where the Precision line begins | * [[Reference:3003|Precision 3003]] — where the Precision line begins | ||
Latest revision as of 20:09, 17 October 2026
Precision › 6694
The 6694 is the last of the four manual-wind Oysterdate references and one of the longest-running manual-wind Oysterdate references. A 34 mm steel Oyster, a date at three under a cyclops, a hand-wound Rolex caliber from the 1200 family, and no rotor — that is the whole watch. Documented examples run from about 1959 to about 1986, and new old stock was still leaving authorised dealers in 1989. It was sold in several case and dial configurations, including steel, plated and capped examples.
Auction catalogues sometimes misidentify the winding system on this reference. Several auction entries use “automatic” in a title or prose line while their movement fields identify manual calibers, including the Christie’s lot whose specification states manual caliber 1225. The reference has also acquired a distinction it cannot support — that it was the last manual-wind Rolex ever made — which Rolex's own product pages refute. These claims recur in auction and dealer descriptions.
Core facts
| detail | value |
|---|---|
| reference | 6694 |
| model designations | Oysterdate Precision, Oysterdate, Oyster Date, Date |
| family | Precision (non-chronometer manual-wind Oyster) |
| documented production | about 1959 to about 1986; retail into 1989 |
| case diameter | 34 mm (auction catalogues state 33–36 mm; see below) |
| case shape | tonneau / round Oyster, three-piece |
| case materials | stainless steel; gold plated, gold shell, gold filled and two-tone on steel |
| lug width | 19 mm |
| bezel | smooth polished; engine-turned or fluted gold on gold-cased variants |
| crown | screw-down, single seal |
| crystal | acrylic with cyclops |
| movement | manual-wind Rolex cal. 1210, 1215 and 1225, all 17 jewels |
| date | non-quickset |
| chronometer | no |
| no-date sibling | 6426 |
| automatic counterpart | Oyster Perpetual Date 1500 / 1501 / 1503 |
Where it sits in the line
The Oysterdate ran as a four-reference sequence — 6094, then 6294, then 6494, then 6694 — and the 6694 outlived the other three put together. The introduction is usually given as 1958, replacing the 6094 and 6494, but that date rests on dealer and marketplace copy with no primary citation behind it, and one collector-forum account offered explicitly as belief rather than documentation. The 1958 introduction has not been confirmed from a period Rolex catalogue. What can be shown is that the earliest example whose case number agrees with its catalogue date is a 1959 watch.

Two related manual-wind Oysters sit beside the 6694. The 6426 has no date; the 6694 adds one. Auction catalogues identify overlapping calibres across these references, so the date alone does not identify the movement. Antiquorum has offered a 6426 and a 6694 together as a pair. The other useful comparison is the automatic Oyster Perpetual Date 1500, 1501 and 1503, a 34 mm steel Oyster with a date and cyclops. Its calibres are 1560, 1565 and 1570, and it is a more plausible source for auction-title confusion about winding.
Production outline

Documented examples begin around 1959. The anchor is a Bonhams lot catalogued "Circa 1959" carrying case number 476635 and caliber 1215, a serial that falls inside the 437255–530168 band the published Pergola chart assigns to 1959. Antiquorum's earliest specific year is 1960. The latest examples cluster in 1986: Antiquorum dates case 9305597 to that year, Christie's dates case 9'304'937 to it, and Bonhams catalogues a case in the 8.82 million range as "Circa 1985". All three sit inside the 8,000,000–9,900,000 band that reads as 1984 to 1987.
Catalogue dates earlier than 1959 are cataloguing errors rather than evidence of early production, and the auction record contains the proof of that inside its own pages. Three Bonhams lots carry case numbers within 4,613 of each other — 472027, 476522 and 476635 — and the same department dated them "Circa 1947", "Circa 1950" and "Circa 1959". The serial chart puts all three in 1959. Two of the three attributions are wrong and the third is right, from one cataloguing desk. Heritage shows the same pattern from the other direction: it dates case 172362 to "circa 1940" and case 5550967 to "circa 1949", while dating case 790816 to 1962 and case 1210912 to 1965, which is not a monotonic reading of its own serials. The mechanical argument closes it. The Rolex 1200 caliber family dates to 1954, so no 6694 can predate it.
Where a lot transcribes the quarter-and-year stamp from inside the caseback, that stamp and the serial chart agree: case 722333 with IV.61, case 1504914 with III.66, case 1840635 with II.68, case 2660571 with IV.70. That agreement across a dozen lots is what makes the handful of outliers diagnosable.

Production appears to stop around 1986, but the watch stayed on shelves. One owner records buying serial 882xxxx new from an authorised dealer in June 1989, noting it had been at the dealer "for quite a while" — which dates the sale rather than the manufacture, and explains the widely repeated but unsupported claim that the reference was built until 1989.
The "last manual-wind Rolex" claim
The 6694 is often described as the last manual-wind Rolex ever made. It was not, and the error is worth naming because it travels.
Rolex sold manual-wind watches for roughly a quarter century after the 6694 left the catalogue. Its own product pages for the Cellini Rolex Prince, live through December 2014, carry a section headed "Wound by hand" and read: "The Prince features a manually-wound mechanical movement - the 7040 calibre - specially developed and manufactured by Rolex." The specification block on the same pages gives "Manually wound mechanical movement" and "Calibre 7040, Manufacture Rolex". That is the manufacturer describing current production, and it settles the point.
Phillips dates a 6426 case, R492,864, to circa 1987; the latest cited 6694 cases are dated circa 1986. These are dates assigned to individual watches, not factory production endpoints. The two references share an Oyster case family and manual 1200-series movements, though auction catalogues give overlapping caliber attributions. The evidence leaves open which manual-wind Oyster reference ended later.
Movement notes
Three calibers are documented on 6694 lots, all manual-wind, all 17 jewels, all from the Rolex 1200 family. Caliber 1220 is never named on a 6694 at any of the six houses searched.
| caliber | beat | date | seen on 6694 lots at |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1210 | 18,000 A/h | per the caliber literature, no date | Antiquorum, Christie's, Sotheby's, Bonhams |
| 1215 | 18,000 A/h | date | Phillips, Sotheby's, Heritage, Bonhams |
| 1225 | 21,600 A/h | date | all six houses; the dominant attribution |
The family architecture is described consistently by two independent sources — the watch-wiki caliber pages and a working watchmaker's teardown review of the 1200 series. The 1200 is the sub-seconds base; the 1210 adds centre seconds; the 1215 is the 1210 with a date; the 1220 is the 1210 uprated from 18,000 to 21,600 A/h; the 1225 is the 1220 with a date. The move from 1215 to 1225 in the 6694 is therefore a beat-rate upgrade rather than a redesign, and it lands somewhere in the mid-1960s. Datapoints straddle 1964 and the exact year is not settled. Owners report the practical consequence: escapement parts for the slower 1215 are scarce and expensive, and Rolex's own service network treats a 1215 watch as vintage and a 1225 watch as ordinary.
Two points remain uncertain. The caliber literature makes the 1210 the no-date variant, yet Antiquorum, Christie's, Sotheby's and Bonhams all catalogue a 1210 inside a date-carrying 6694 — either those cataloguers are transcribing a base-caliber marking, or the date and no-date split is less clean than the reference pages state. And power reserve is given as 58 hours by both caliber sources and as about 40 hours across much of the market literature. Hacking is not established by the cited sources.
The date is non-quickset. Setting it means running the hands round.
A reader comparing catalogue entries will also meet caliber numbers that do not exist. Bonhams prints "Cal.210", "Cal.215", "Cal.160" and "Cal.619"; Heritage prints "Cal. 215"; Antiquorum prints "Cal. 1224" once, against 1225 on every sibling lot, and stores a 9½-ligne size as database mojibake in six older entries. Leading-digit truncation of 1210 and 1215 is the obvious reading, and it appears independently at two houses. One Phillips lot gives "manual caliber 726", which belongs to no part of the 1200 family and is corroborated nowhere else.
The automatic attributions
-
Case 2943776, sold with its dated guarantee and swing tag. The lot title calls it automatic; the movement field on the same page reads 17-jewel manual wind.
-
The back of case 2 083 433. A rotor needs a domed caseback to turn under; every 6694 back in the auction record is flat.
Four of the six houses have catalogued a 6694 as automatic or self-winding. Every instance contradicts itself inside its own entry, and the pattern is the same everywhere: the error sits in the title or the prose sentence, never in the movement specification.
Christie's supplies the cleanest case. Lot 6194009 is titled "AN EXTREMELY FINE AND RARE STAINLESS STEEL AUTOMATIC WRISTWATCH", and its own specification block on the same page reads "Movement: Manual, Cal. 1225, 17 jewels, signed". At Bonhams, five of the seven lots with "automatic" in the title give "manual wind" or "Manual Winding" in their own movement field, including both Gulf special-order dials. A sixth reads "17-jewel Cal.1215 automatic" — 1215 is manual in every other attestation. The seventh reads "17-jewel Cal.854 automatic, No.1215", which is two watches spliced together: caliber 854 is IWC's automatic, a Pellaton-wound movement of 21, 23 or 25 jewels, so the stated 17 jewels belongs to the Rolex, and a Rolex caliber number is sitting in the serial field. There is no Rolex caliber 854.
Sotheby's contributes the most instructive version. Two Dubai lots, offered eight months apart, both read "cal. 6694 automatic, 17 jewels" — the reference number entered in the caliber field. They share case number 5'106'160. It is one watch re-offered with the error copied forward, and the two entries disagree with each other on dial colour. Antiquorum's four self-winding lots all name a manual caliber in the movement line immediately below the word. Phillips and Heritage never call one automatic; a Phillips essay states the position plainly, noting that "the absence of 'PERPETUAL' on the dial is justified" by the manual caliber.
A service-replaced automatic movement would show up as an automatic caliber in the movement field, and never does. A genuine automatic variant would need a reference block, and Rolex already had one for the automatic 34 mm date Oyster. Across roughly 160 lots at six houses, none names an automatic Rolex caliber, describes a rotor, or describes the domed caseback a rotor requires. There is no automatic 6694.
Dial map
Dial variety is a large part of the 6694’s collector appeal. Rolex ran the 6694 for a quarter century across every market it served, and the dial is where that shows.
Factory colours and finishes
| dial | notes |
|---|---|
| sunburst silvered | the default, and by a wide margin the most common |
| silvered, thatched or linen-textured | period surface treatment on an otherwise standard dial |
| champagne | recurring across the run |
| black, gloss with gilt printing | earlier examples; gilt markers and gilt dagger or baton hands |
| black, matte | later examples |
| black, semi-gloss | catalogued at Heritage with the crown at 12 |
| grey sunburst | mid-1970s examples |
| blue | catalogued at Bonhams, Sotheby's and Heritage |
| lime green | Bonhams, on a 1964 example with Mercedes hands |
| yellow | Antiquorum and Christie's |
| burgundy | Antiquorum, 1962 |
| matte pink | Antiquorum, 1963 |
| cream | Bonhams, on the gold-plated case |
| two-tone silver, painted gold Roman numerals | Antiquorum |
| white gold radial Roman numerals | Antiquorum, 2013 sale |
| ivory | on the gold-filled 6694/5 |
| tropical gilt | aged rather than made; gilt printing turned brown |
-
A blue dial on case 2730705, circa 1971, caliber 1225, on a folded 7835 bracelet with 357 end links.
-
A tropical gilt dial on case 828496 (Antiquorum Hong Kong sale 343, lot 323): the printing has turned brown with age rather than leaving the factory that colour. On a riveted 7205 bracelet with 61 end links.
Case 828496's identity remains unsettled. Antiquorum catalogues it as a 6694, and the pictured dial reads 'Oysterdate' and shows a date. Its caseback photograph reads 6426. The related references use the Oyster case design, so a caseback change is possible; a catalogue mismatch is also possible. The record does not distinguish between them, and the watch should not be used as a clean 6694 example without further authentication.
Markers run from applied faceted gilt chevrons and arrowheads on the earliest watches to the applied polished batons that dominate the middle and late run. Hands follow: dauphine early, then pointed batons with luminous inserts as the standard, with gilt daggers, alpha and — on at least one catalogued example — Mercedes hands appearing across the range.
The dial footer dates the watch as usefully as the serial. Earliest examples are radium and read SWISS alone. Tritium arrives after 1963 and brings the T SWISS T footer, written with flanking dashes on 1970s dials. A watch with a 1.02 million serial and a SWISS-only footer is a mismatch, and forum specialists treat it as one.
Special-order dials
-
The black lacquer dial with gilt Arabic graphics made for Sheikh Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, 1965, caliber 1215 — the strongest result the reference has recorded.
-
The Yemen Arab Republic coat of arms, 1975, caliber 1225. Phillips checked the arms against the period, noting the version shown was used from 1974 to 1990.
-
The State of Qatar emblem on a champagne dial, case 3787963, 1974, caliber 1225.
-
The Saudi Fund for Development logo, case 1029790, 1964, caliber 1225, here on a Jubilee bracelet.
-
A Tiffany & Co. signature under the coronet, sold with its original Tiffany box.
The 6694's most valuable branch is the special-order emblem dial, concentrated heavily in the Gulf states. Rolex supplied these to governments, armed forces, ministries, universities and companies, and they are where the reference's strongest results sit.
| emblem | example |
|---|---|
| UAE Coat of Arms / Crest / Eagle | at least seven lots across Antiquorum and Sotheby's, 1971 to 1986 |
| UAE Air Force | Antiquorum, 1985, offered with its original warranty |
| UAE Quraysh Hawk | Sotheby's, cal. 1210, circa 1974; a Christie's example carries Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum's signature |
| Abu Dhabi Ministry of Defence | Christie's, case 4'449'821, circa 1976 |
| Abu Dhabi Defense Force | Sotheby's, cal. 1225, case 2'048'392, circa 1969 |
| Kuwaiti Army | Christie's, case 5'265'110, circa 1977 |
| made for Sheikh Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah | Phillips, 1965, black lacquer with gilt graphics, cal. 1215 |
| Yemen Arab Republic coat of arms | Phillips, 1975, cal. 1225 |
| State of Qatar emblem | Bonhams, champagne dial |
| The Saudi Fund for Development | Bonhams, champagne dial |
| King Abdulaziz University | Sotheby's, case 5'106'160 |
| Arab crest / Arabic logo | Antiquorum, three lots, 1966 to 1974 |
| Coca-Cola | Antiquorum, case 7019721, made 1981 |
| San Miguel brewery | Heritage, cal. 1225, case 8299388, with a C.R.S. mark in the caseback |
Phillips does the most careful work on these. On the Yemen dial it notes that the arms shown are the coat of arms of North Yemen used from 1974 to 1990, "which is correct for the date of this watch" — the kind of internal check that separates a documented special order from a decorated dial. On the Kuwaiti example its research "suggests that this watch was made to commemorate the independence of Kuwait". One Sotheby's entry contains an inconsistency: it describes a "UAE enamel logo" on a watch it also identifies as a King Abdulaziz University gift, a Saudi institution.
Retailer signing is thinner but real. Tiffany & Co. dials are documented at two houses — an Antiquorum example sold with its original Tiffany presentation box, and a run of five from a single collection at Sotheby's.
Mickey Mouse and the aftermarket dials

The 6694 is the canonical base watch for aftermarket Mickey Mouse dials, and they are aftermarket. Bonhams catalogues them precisely, describing the dial as "Silvered, later applied Mickey and Minnie Mouse"; Antiquorum grades one "Reprinted" in its own dial grading and calls it a refinished Topolino dial. Christie's and Sotheby's both sell them without claiming factory origin. Forum specialists are blunter — the long-standing position among vintage Rolex moderators is that no genuine factory example exists, and that Rolex never offered a Mickey Mouse dial. They are still being manufactured today: a current parts supplier sells a new Mickey dial cut for the cal. 1225 with feet at 23 and 52 for well under two hundred dollars.
One editorial voice dissents. Writing in 2011, Ariel Adams argued that "it looks very likely that Rolex did have an actual relationship with Disney in mostly the 1960s and 1970s up to the early 1980s". No primary source is offered for it, and the attribution is to his own research. The proposed Rolex–Disney relationship remains unconfirmed.
The same caution extends further. Salmon, tuxedo and bright primary-colour dials circulate on 6694 cases and are treated as refinishes by the specialists who see the most of them — one moderator states flatly that no red 6694 exists, and describes a UK operation that spent the late 1990s swapping tired original dials for fake coloured ones in imitation of Stella dials. Bonhams has nonetheless catalogued a "Red, signed" dial on a 1978 example without qualification, and Antiquorum labels its own red and green examples as aftermarket. The houses do not agree with each other. How much of the surviving dial population is original is itself disputed: one experienced contributor estimates nine in ten currently for sale are aftermarket, another says there is not much fake material on 6694 cases because values never justified the effort. Both are worth weighing before buying a coloured dial.
Case, bezel, crystal, and crown
The case is a three-piece Oyster, tonneau in profile, with a screw-down back and a screw-down crown. The crown is a single-seal design rather than a two-seal Twinlock, a detail that matters in service — an oversized replacement O-ring is a common reason a 6694 crown will not seat fully. The crystal is acrylic with a moulded cyclops. The bezel is smooth and polished on steel examples, and engine-turned or fluted on the gold-cased variants.
Case diameter needs care, because the auction record does not agree with itself. Bonhams alone states 33 mm on one lot, 34 mm on nine, 35 mm on twenty-one and 36 mm on one, for the same reference; Sotheby's spans 33 to 36 mm, Christie's 33 to 35, Heritage 34 and 35, Phillips 34 and 35. 34 mm is the figure the collector literature uses and the figure quoted above. The reason for the measurement spread is undocumented; a catalogue figure needs checking against the watch.
-
Case 476522 in steel with a gold fluted bezel, and one of the few 6694s catalogued with a roulette date wheel.
-
A pink gold capped case with a black galvanic dial, 1962, caliber 1225. The caseback on these stays steel.
Beyond plain steel, the 6694 was cased several ways. Gold-plated examples pair a plated case with a stainless steel back and carry a "KB 40" stamp between the lugs at six o'clock; the marking is read by forum specialists as Kessi Frères of Bienne, the case maker, at 40 microns of plating. Matching plated bracelets of the era carry a large P on the end link. No auction house records the KB stamp, so this identification rests on community research rather than catalogue evidence. Gold shell and gold-capped constructions appear in both yellow and pink, described variously as "gold shell top and sides on steel", "pink gold capped" and "pink gold topped and steel" with a steel caseback in each case. A gold-filled variant carries its own sub-reference, 6694/5, with a yellow gold engine-turned bezel. Antiquorum has catalogued one two-tone example as "yellow gold plated and stainless steel Rolésor".
Solid gold is not confirmed. The single candidate is a title-only Sotheby's lot from 2001 that went unsold and whose description has not survived, which is an attribution rather than a description. Nothing here should be read as establishing that a solid gold 6694 exists.
Bracelets, end links, and clasps
Lug width is 19 mm, and the bracelet fitted depends on where in the run the watch falls.
| bracelet | type | period |
|---|---|---|
| 7205 | riveted | earlier examples; end links 60 and 61 recorded |
| 6635 | riveted, European stretch | alternative riveted fitment |
| 7835 (also 7835/19, 7835,19B) | folded link | middle of the run; end links 357, 361, 361B |
| 78350 | solid link | later; end links 557 and 557B |
The folded-to-solid changeover falls around 1976, so either can be correct on a mid-1970s watch. Leather is common on surviving examples but is usually a later fitment rather than an original delivery — auction descriptions mark these as "associated" more often than not.
Clasp stamps recorded across the Bonhams lots include 2 69, 4 68, 3 63, 2 71, 4 52, S1, S11, N4, M11, G, S U10 and 7835 J2. One of those is instructive: a clasp stamped 4 52 sits on a watch dated to around 1960. A clasp code dates the bracelet alone, and the 6694 — cheap, common, and worn hard — has had more bracelets swapped between cases than almost any other vintage Rolex.
Auction record
The results below are individual sales. They show how dial, provenance and condition affected those lots; they do not establish a general market range.
| sale | lot | result |
|---|---|---|
| Phillips, Hong Kong Watch Auction: TWO, 31 May 2016 | lot 215, black lacquer gilt dial made for Sheikh Abdullah Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, 1965, cal. 1215 | HK$106,250 against HK$60,000–90,000 |
| Phillips, Hong Kong Watch Auction: TWO, 31 May 2016 | lot 31, Yemen Arab Republic coat of arms, 1975, cal. 1225 | HK$75,000 |
| Antiquorum, Geneva, 11 November 2007 | lot 106, Coca-Cola logo dial, made 1981 | CHF 14,160 against CHF 4,000–6,000 |
| Sotheby's, Hong Kong | lot 8651, Abu Dhabi Defense Force, circa 1969 | HK$48,640 |
| Bonhams, Hong Kong, 2018 | lots 866 and 867, State of Qatar emblem and Saudi Fund for Development | HK$37,500 each |
| Antiquorum, Forte dei Marmi, 26 June 2021 | lot 87, Tiffany & Co. signed with original box, circa 1974 | EUR 6,125 |
| Sotheby's, Mellon Jewelry, 20–21 November 2014 | lots 133–137, five Tiffany-signed examples from one collection | USD 6,250 to 8,125 each, against USD 1,500–2,000 estimates |
| Antiquorum, Milan, 17 April 2025 | lot 136, refinished Topolino dial, circa 1985 | EUR 3,528 against EUR 1,000–2,000 |
These results span two decades and five currencies. The sale descriptions identify the watches and their documented details; they should not be read as a price guide for every 6694.
Two watches in the record appear twice each, re-offered at the same house within months, which is worth knowing before treating lot counts as population counts.
What to look for
The caseback interior is the primary document. It carries the reference stamp and, on many examples, a Roman-numeral quarter and year that dates the case directly — I.64, III.66, IV.70 — and that stamp has proved more reliable than the catalogue date printed above it.
Match the caliber to the era. A 1215 on an early-1960s serial and a 1225 on anything after the mid-1960s are both period-correct; the reverse combination needs explaining. Match the dial footer too: SWISS alone with radium on the earliest watches, T SWISS T after 1963.
Treat any coloured dial as a question until its finish and provenance are checked. Auction catalogues describe the Mickey Mouse examples cited here as later or refinished dials. Check a stated case diameter against an actual measurement. And read the word "automatic" in a lot title as a cataloguing error, then check the movement field, which will almost always say otherwise.
Related references
- Oyster Precision 6426 — no-date sibling
- Precision 3003 — where the Precision line begins
See also the movement reference, bracelet & clasp guide, and serial numbers by year.
Sources
- "Bonhams past-lot archive: Rolex reference 6694", Bonhams
- "Antiquorum catalogue archive: Rolex reference 6694", Antiquorum
- "Phillips Hong Kong Watch Auction: TWO, 31 May 2016, lots 215 and 31; and XV, 29 November 2022, lot 1004", Phillips
- "Christie's live and online sale archive: Rolex reference 6694", Christie's
- "Sotheby's lot archive: Rolex reference 6694", Sotheby's
- "Heritage Auctions timepieces archive: Rolex reference 6694", Heritage Auctions
- "Rolex.com: Cellini Rolex Prince, calibre 7040", Rolex, 2014
- "watch-wiki: Rolex calibre 1210, 1215, 1220, 1225", watch-wiki.net
- mitka88, "Rolex calibre 1200 / 1210 / 1215 / 2020 / 2025 review", mitka.co.uk, 2021-11-10
- RolexHaven (anonymous specialist), "RolexHaven — Serial Numbers (Pergola + Dowling charts photographed)", rolexhaven.com
- "VintageRolexForum: 6694 dial authenticity and case marking threads", VintageRolexForum
- "RolexForums: 6694 ownership, service and bracelet threads", RolexForums
- Ariel Adams, "Rolex Oyster Date Mickey Mouse Watch Available On James List", aBlogtoWatch, 2011-04-24











