Reference:Movements: Difference between revisions

[checked revision][checked revision]
Add reference 5002 coverage and cross-page documentation
Add attributed ref. 2057 movement note
 
(29 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
<div class="rp-index">
<div class="rp-index">
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Prince (shaped)</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-300|300]] [[#cal-300-ts|7½ T.S. 300]] [[#cal-310|310]] [[#cal-360-hw|360 HW]] [[#cal-350-ts|350 T.S.]] [[#cal-1759|1759]]</div></div>
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Prince (shaped)</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-300|300]] [[#cal-300-ts|7½ T.S. 300]] [[#cal-310|310]] [[#cal-360-hw|360 HW]] [[#cal-350-ts|350 T.S.]] [[#cal-1759|1759]]</div></div>
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Oyster Perpetual automatic</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-1130-rolex-automatic|1130 OP]] [[#cal-1160|1160]] [[#cal-1161|1161]]</div></div>
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Oyster Perpetual automatic</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-1130-rolex-automatic|1130 OP]] [[#cal-1160|1160]] [[#cal-1161|1161]] [[#cal-2030|2030]]</div></div>
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Bubbleback / early automatic</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-520|520]] [[#cal-420|420]] [[#cal-50|50]] [[#cal-620|620]] [[#cal-630|630]] [[#cal-635|635]] [[#cal-105-hunter|700/710]] [[#cal-600|600]] [[#cal-59|59]] [[#cal-a260|A260]] [[#cal-a296|A296]] [[#cal-a295|A.295]] [[#cal-645|645]] [[#cal-740|740]] [[#cal-745|745]]</div></div>
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Bubbleback / early automatic</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-520|520]] [[#cal-420|420]] [[#cal-50|50]] [[#cal-620|620]] [[#cal-630|630]] [[#cal-635|635]] [[#cal-105-hunter|700/710]] [[#cal-600|600]] [[#cal-59|59]] [[#cal-a260|A260]] [[#cal-a296|A296]] [[#cal-a295|A.295]] [[#cal-645|645]] [[#cal-720-auto|720 automatic (lot attribution)]] [[#cal-740|740]] [[#cal-745|745]]</div></div>
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Calendar / moonphase</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-a295-cpl|A.295 CPL]]</div></div>
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Calendar / moonphase</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-a295-cpl|A.295 CPL]]</div></div>
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Early Oyster (lot attribution)</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-2849-note|2849 (Cal. 500 attribution)]]</div></div>
<div class="rp-era"><div class="rp-era-name">Early Oyster (lot attribution)</div><div class="rp-chips">[[#cal-2849-note|2849 (Cal. 500 attribution)]]</div></div>
Line 44: Line 44:


The early Oyster chronograph references use Valjoux ébauches, with Rolex caliber designations that should be kept distinct from the maker’s base number. Available auction records support a limited Cal. 13 / Valjoux 23-family entry. Ebauches S.A.'s 1951 technical guide labels a two-pusher, 13-ligne movement “VZ 23” ([https://myretrowatches.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Valjoux-VZ-23-Technical-Guide.pdf technical guide, 2nd edition March 1953]). That nomenclature does not establish Rolex fitment. The Cal. 13 evidence discussed here concerns the 3525 and does not identify every early Rolex chronograph movement.
The early Oyster chronograph references use Valjoux ébauches, with Rolex caliber designations that should be kept distinct from the maker’s base number. Available auction records support a limited Cal. 13 / Valjoux 23-family entry. Ebauches S.A.'s 1951 technical guide labels a two-pusher, 13-ligne movement “VZ 23” ([https://myretrowatches.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Valjoux-VZ-23-Technical-Guide.pdf technical guide, 2nd edition March 1953]). That nomenclature does not establish Rolex fitment. The Cal. 13 evidence discussed here concerns the 3525 and does not identify every early Rolex chronograph movement.
For ref. [[Reference:2057|2057]], Phillips describes a manual movement. The 2026 FutureGrail catalogue transcription attributes a 13-ligne Valjoux base by Reymond Frères and 17 jewels; its photograph shows the Rolex signature and jewel count, while the caliber and maker remain unreadable. Treat this as a lot attribution, not a confirmed caliber assignment.


Ref. [[Reference:2021|2021]] is a pre-Oyster monopusher. Published descriptions give movement sizes from 13 to 16½ lignes; Uhrenkosmos names a Valjoux VZ in one early monopusher, while auction catalogues describe different executions. The available records do not support a reference-wide caliber assignment. Keep these descriptions separate from the Cal. 13 entry below. [https://www.uhrenkosmos.com/rolex-daytona-seine-technik-und-geschichte/ Uhrenkosmos, early monopusher movement] [https://www.phillips.com/detail/rolex/115419 Phillips, case 12'010] [https://www.cambiaste.com/it/asta-0795/rolex---rarissimo-cronografo-due-contatori-da-polso-monopulsante-in-ac-270066 Cambi, steel case 14xxx]
Ref. [[Reference:2021|2021]] is a pre-Oyster monopusher. Published descriptions give movement sizes from 13 to 16½ lignes; Uhrenkosmos names a Valjoux VZ in one early monopusher, while auction catalogues describe different executions. The available records do not support a reference-wide caliber assignment. Keep these descriptions separate from the Cal. 13 entry below. [https://www.uhrenkosmos.com/rolex-daytona-seine-technik-und-geschichte/ Uhrenkosmos, early monopusher movement] [https://www.phillips.com/detail/rolex/115419 Phillips, case 12'010] [https://www.cambiaste.com/it/asta-0795/rolex---rarissimo-cronografo-due-contatori-da-polso-monopulsante-in-ac-270066 Cambi, steel case 14xxx]


Auction records describe ref. [[Reference:2303|2303]] with 17-jewel lever movements; several Antiquorum lots measure them at 10½ lignes. Christie’s records a case-band pusher on one example, while other catalogues describe crown-operated monopushers. The lot descriptions leave caliber and maker unnamed, so a Valjoux 23 / Cal. 13 assignment would go beyond them. [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-108-137 Antiquorum, case 17890] [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-4796029 Christie’s, case 022310]
Auction records describe ref. [[Reference:2303|2303]] with 17-jewel lever movements; several Antiquorum lots measure them at 10½ lignes. Christie’s records a case-band pusher on one example, while other catalogues describe crown-operated monopushers. The lot descriptions leave caliber and maker unnamed, so a Valjoux 23 / Cal. 13 assignment would go beyond them. [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-108-137 Antiquorum, case 17890] [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-4796029 Christie’s, case 022310]
For [[Reference:3346|ref. 3346]], the Field Manual lists a 10-ligne Hunter movement; Christie’s, Phillips and Sotheby’s describe 10½-ligne manual movements in individual watches, with jewel counts of 17 or 18 in the catalogues. The book and Phillips call the movement in-house or patented, but the auction image sets reviewed here do not show a movement. No numbered caliber is established, and the size and jewel-count descriptions remain attached to their sources. [https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/0b5fdf83/files/uploaded/1.0%20RolexBook-23Mar.pdf The Vintage Rolex Field Manual, p. 71] [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-2070687 Christie’s, 2002, 18-jewel description] [https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-5674673 Christie’s, 2013] [https://www.phillips.com/detail/rolex/CH080016/36 Phillips, 2016] [https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2024/important-watches/reference-3346-zerograph-an-extremely-rare-and?locale=en Sotheby’s, 2024] [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-144-365 Antiquorum, 2006, 18 jewels]
For [[Reference:3462|ref. 3462]], auction catalogues also describe a manual 10½-ligne movement, with 17 or 18 jewels. White’s Field Manual gives 10 lignes for the 3346/3462 pair and calls the movement a Hunter. The catalogues identify movement size and jewel count, not a numeric caliber for the 3462. [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5091717 Christie’s, case 161’501] [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6079995 Christie’s, case 161’489] [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-66-71 Antiquorum, lot 71]


<span id="cal-13"></span>
<span id="cal-13"></span>
Line 115: Line 121:
The Cal. 300 examples described here have no identified shock-protection system. Incabloc dates the start of its production to 1933 and the later lyre-spring design to 1938. Those dates alone cannot establish the fittings in a particular Prince.
The Cal. 300 examples described here have no identified shock-protection system. Incabloc dates the start of its production to 1933 and the later lyre-spring design to 1938. Those dates alone cannot establish the fittings in a particular Prince.


Several UK auction catalogues treat the three- and four-digit numbers found on movements in refs 1862, 1490, and 1855 as calibers. The documented numbers are 510, 579, 841, 1004, 1130, and 1439, with weaker evidence for 701 and a single record of 1759. They are almost certainly movement serials read from the plate. Continental catalogues identify the same movement class by grade and the T.S. size code instead. Cal. 414 and Cal. 527 have no documented connection to the Rolex Prince. The number 971A is a Prince case reference, not an established caliber designation; Antiquorum catalogued that reference in 1989 with a T.S./300-family movement. Fabsuisse labels the movement in its separate ref. 3937 dealer listing “Cal. 971A,” but the auction records reviewed here do not confirm that designation. Treat it as an unverified dealer attribution unless a readable movement marking supports it.
Several UK auction catalogues treat the three- and four-digit numbers found on movements in refs 1862, 1490, and 1855 as calibers. The documented numbers are 510, 579, 841, 1004, 1130, and 1439, with weaker evidence for 701 and a single record of 1759. They are almost certainly movement serials read from the plate. A 2024 Alexandre Landre listing of ref. 1855 calls another movement “Rolex 318”; its lot photographs do not show a readable marking, so this remains an unverified catalogue label. Continental catalogues identify the same movement class by grade and the T.S. size code instead. Cal. 414 and Cal. 527 have no documented connection to the Rolex Prince. The number 971A is a Prince case reference, not an established caliber designation; Antiquorum catalogued that reference in 1989 with a T.S./300-family movement. Fabsuisse labels the movement in its separate ref. 3937 dealer listing “Cal. 971A,” but the auction records reviewed here do not confirm that designation. Treat it as an unverified dealer attribution unless a readable movement marking supports it.


<span id="cal-300-ts"></span>
<span id="cal-300-ts"></span>
Line 221: Line 227:
|-
|-
| 510
| 510
| Prince Brancard ref. 1855, serial 143**, circa 1930
| Prince Brancard ref. 1855, case 14368 (Bonhams photograph); Christie’s separately identifies case 14382, circa 1930
| "17-jewel Cal.510 manual wind movement tested to 8 positions"
| "17-jewel Cal.510 manual wind movement tested to 8 positions"
| 8-position adjustment, against the more typical 6
| Bonhams photograph shows 510 and 17 Rubies on case 14368; a separate Alexandre Landre listing calls another ref. 1855 movement Rolex 318, without a readable mark. [https://www.alexandrelandre.com/lot/148418/25180425-rolex-prince-ref-1855-montre-bracelet-en-acier-et-deux Alexandre Landre, lot 30]
|-
|-
| 579
| 579
Line 341: Line 347:
| 7040-3 || [[Reference:5441/9|5441/9]] || 18 ct white gold; silver Godron Circulaire or diamond-pavé Godron dial
| 7040-3 || [[Reference:5441/9|5441/9]] || 18 ct white gold; silver Godron Circulaire or diamond-pavé Godron dial
|-
|-
| 7040-2 || 5442/5 || Everose gold; Rayon Flammé de la Gloire dial
| 7040-2 || [[Reference:5442/5|5442/5]] || Everose gold; Rayon Flammé de la Gloire dial
|-
|-
| 7040-4 || 5443/9 || 18 ct white gold; double Rayon Flammé de la Gloire dial
| 7040-4 || 5443/9 || 18 ct white gold; double Rayon Flammé de la Gloire dial
Line 347: Line 353:


Rolex's model-specific text assigns Cal. 7040-3 to both 5441/9 dial versions. Antiquorum's 2008 catalogue calls case D758994 Cal. 7040-1; Christie's and Sotheby's identify other 5441/9 examples as 7040-3. Keep Antiquorum's label with that lot; the available record does not resolve it. [https://web.archive.org/web/20141220000635/http://www.rolex.com/watches/cellini-rolex-prince/m5441_9-0012.html Rolex archived Cellini Prince product page, 2014]; [https://www.rolexforum.nl/prijslijst-rolex-NL2015.pdf Rolex Netherlands price list, 2015]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-205-78 Antiquorum, Geneva, 2008]; [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5493261 Christie's, case D774253]; [https://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2010/important-watches-ge1001/lot.132.html Sotheby's, Geneva, 2010, lot 132].
Rolex's model-specific text assigns Cal. 7040-3 to both 5441/9 dial versions. Antiquorum's 2008 catalogue calls case D758994 Cal. 7040-1; Christie's and Sotheby's identify other 5441/9 examples as 7040-3. Keep Antiquorum's label with that lot; the available record does not resolve it. [https://web.archive.org/web/20141220000635/http://www.rolex.com/watches/cellini-rolex-prince/m5441_9-0012.html Rolex archived Cellini Prince product page, 2014]; [https://www.rolexforum.nl/prijslijst-rolex-NL2015.pdf Rolex Netherlands price list, 2015]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-205-78 Antiquorum, Geneva, 2008]; [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5493261 Christie's, case D774253]; [https://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/ecatalogue/2010/important-watches-ge1001/lot.132.html Sotheby's, Geneva, 2010, lot 132].
Rolex's archived 5442/5 page assigns Cal. 7040-2, as do Christie's, Kaplans and Sotheby's examples. Antiquorum's 2008 and 2022 catalogues call two 5442/5 movements 7040-1. Retain those labels with their lots; the available images do not establish a separate reference-wide movement version. [https://web.archive.org/web/20141017054035/http://www.rolex.com/watches/cellini-rolex-prince/m5442_5-0001.html Rolex archived 5442/5 product page, 2014]; [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5196177 Christie's Geneva 2009, lot 315]; [https://www.kaplans.se/sv/auktioner/2592/vara/999631 Kaplans, Stockholm, 2013, lot 469]; [https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2021/fine-watches-6/cellini-ref-5442-montre-bracelet-en-or-rose-pink Sotheby's, 2021]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-205-231 Antiquorum, Geneva, 2008, lot 231]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-ref-5442-5-prince-cellini-lot-353-198 Antiquorum, Monaco, 2022, lot 198].


<span id="bubbleback-family"></span>
<span id="bubbleback-family"></span>
Line 380: Line 388:


The Field Manual lists Cal. 1161 on base 1100, with automatic winding, 26 jewels and 19,800 vph; its table gives 1970. Sotheby's attributes Cal. 1161 to a ref. [[Reference:6548|6548]] dated circa 1964. Bonhams assigns it to a circa-1968 watch catalogued jointly as refs. 6548/6549. These catalogue dates precede the manual's entry; the sources do not establish the 6548 fitment interval or resolve the conflict. [https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/0b5fdf83/files/uploaded/1.0%20RolexBook-23Mar.pdf The Vintage Rolex Field Manual]; [https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2020/watches-5/rolex-reference-6548-oyster-perpetual-mickey-mouse-2 Sotheby's]; [https://images1.bonhams.com/original?src=Images%2Flive%2F2020-01%2F30%2FS-25954-0-1.pdf Bonhams, lot 161]
The Field Manual lists Cal. 1161 on base 1100, with automatic winding, 26 jewels and 19,800 vph; its table gives 1970. Sotheby's attributes Cal. 1161 to a ref. [[Reference:6548|6548]] dated circa 1964. Bonhams assigns it to a circa-1968 watch catalogued jointly as refs. 6548/6549. These catalogue dates precede the manual's entry; the sources do not establish the 6548 fitment interval or resolve the conflict. [https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/0b5fdf83/files/uploaded/1.0%20RolexBook-23Mar.pdf The Vintage Rolex Field Manual]; [https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2020/watches-5/rolex-reference-6548-oyster-perpetual-mickey-mouse-2 Sotheby's]; [https://images1.bonhams.com/original?src=Images%2Flive%2F2020-01%2F30%2FS-25954-0-1.pdf Bonhams, lot 161]
<span id="cal-2030"></span>
=== Cal. 2030 ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:280px; font-size:90%;"
! detail
! value
|-
| type
| Automatic, sweep seconds
|-
| jewels
| 28
|-
| hacking
| Yes
|-
| fitment documented here
| [[Reference:6718|6718]]; [[Reference:6719|6719]]; exact-reference catalogues list Cal. 2030 in individual watches
|}
Rolex's 1978 Technical and Service Information describes Cal. 2030 as automatic, with sweep seconds, 28 jewels and hacking. It distinguishes the calendar-equipped Cal. 2035. Sotheby's and Antiquorum catalogue Cal. 2030 in individual 6718 watches. The exact-reference catalogues document those individual fitments; broader 6718 fitment and production dates remain unresolved. [https://www.vrfm.io/Scans/TECHNICAL-SERVICE-INFO-3RD-EDITION-1978.pdf Rolex, Technical and Service Information, 3rd ed. (1978)]; [https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2021/fine-watches-11/oyster-perpetual-reference-6718-a-yellow-gold Sotheby's, lot 8136]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-253-252 Antiquorum, lot 252]
Christie's, Antiquorum, and Hindman also catalogue Cal. 2030 in individual 6719 watches; only Antiquorum and Hindman list 28 jewels. These lots document examples, not the full fitment span. [https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/christies-watches-online-keystone-collection/rolex-ladies-18k-oyster-perpetual-ref-6719-162/73481 Christie's]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-ref-6719-oyster-perpetual-lot-342-154 Antiquorum, lot 154]; [https://www.bidsquare.com/online-auctions/hindman-auctions/a-14-karat-yellow-gold-ref-6719-oyster-perpetual-wristwatch-rolex-circa-1973-28537 Hindman, lot 3061]


== Bubbleback and early automatic ==
== Bubbleback and early automatic ==
Line 410: Line 442:
|-
|-
| jewels
| jewels
| 17 in Aste Bolaffi lot 34; 19 in Antiquorum lots 229 and 233
| 17 in Aste Bolaffi lot 34 and Antiquorum’s 6006 lot 253; 19 in Antiquorum lots 229 and 233
|-
|-
| movement size
| movement size
Line 419: Line 451:
|}
|}


The Field Manual lists Cal. 520 for ref. 1858; Aste Bolaffi identifies movement 1143 as Hunter 8¾ (520), and Vintage & Prestige and WatchNet list Cal. 520 for their ref. 1858 examples. Hodinkee's 2024 family guide instead assigns Cal. 620 to the first series beginning with ref. 1858. Phillips and Antiquorum's 2006 and 2013 lots list 8¾-line movements; Antiquorum's 2021 Hong Kong entry gives 9¾ line without naming a caliber. The lots report 17 jewels for Bolaffi movement 1143 and 19 for the two Antiquorum movements.
The Field Manual lists Cal. 520 for ref. 1858; Antiquorum attributes it to the 1952 ref. 6006, case 927300, and reports 17 jewels. Aste Bolaffi identifies movement 1143 as Hunter 8¾ (520), and Vintage & Prestige and WatchNet list Cal. 520 for their ref. 1858 examples. Hodinkee's 2024 family guide instead assigns Cal. 620 to the first series beginning with ref. 1858. Phillips and Antiquorum's 2006 and 2013 lots list 8¾-line movements; Antiquorum's 2021 Hong Kong entry gives 9¾ line without naming a caliber. The lots report 17 jewels for Bolaffi movement 1143 and 19 for the two Antiquorum movements.


Aste Bolaffi identifies movement 1143 as Cal. 520 in its lot description; the caliber stamp is not legible in its photograph. WatchNet's image of product A-6378 shows English service labels, including “CONNECTING CASE SCREWS.”
Aste Bolaffi identifies movement 1143 as Cal. 520 in its lot description; the caliber stamp is not legible in its photograph. WatchNet's image of product A-6378 shows English service labels, including “CONNECTING CASE SCREWS.”
Line 494: Line 526:


Launched in 1937, Cal. 630 was chronometer-certified under the period Swiss testing system, adjusted to seven positions, and fitted with a Breguet hairspring. One secondary source gives 18 jewels rather than the table's 17. The movement developed directly from Cal. 620 and shares its "Vis Tirette *** Patented *** Trigger Screw" cover-plate marking. Its rotor and bridge also carry the same "Rolex Perpetual Chronometer, Swiss Made, Patented, Super-Balance" signature. The caliber number stamped in the small box on the bridge distinguishes the two.
Launched in 1937, Cal. 630 was chronometer-certified under the period Swiss testing system, adjusted to seven positions, and fitted with a Breguet hairspring. One secondary source gives 18 jewels rather than the table's 17. The movement developed directly from Cal. 620 and shares its "Vis Tirette *** Patented *** Trigger Screw" cover-plate marking. Its rotor and bridge also carry the same "Rolex Perpetual Chronometer, Swiss Made, Patented, Super-Balance" signature. The caliber number stamped in the small box on the bridge distinguishes the two.
Antiquorum catalogues ref. [[Reference:4392|4392]], case 607544, with Cal. 630 and a small-seconds dial. The same lot says the dial is probably reprinted, and its photographs do not show the movement. Keep the caliber and dial layout as a conflicting catalogue description, not a verified Cal. 630 small-seconds variant. [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-ref-4392-bubble-back-stainless-steel-lot-383-105 Antiquorum, lot 105]


The Field Manual also lists Cal. 630 against the 3372 suffix variants. Antiquorum explicitly names Cal. 630 in a 3372 with centre seconds ([New York lot 436](https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-23-436)). The same manual lists subsidiary seconds for one 3372/3 entry, while Christie's catalogue describes a 3372 with small seconds and a 9¾-ligne, 17-jewel movement but gives no caliber number ([case 474309](https://www.christies.com/lot/rolex-oyster-perpetual-chronometre-bubble-back-ref-5091692/?intObjectID=5091692&lid=1)). Keep those statements tied to their sources; they do not establish a Cal. 630 small-seconds variant.
The Field Manual also lists Cal. 630 against the 3372 suffix variants. Antiquorum explicitly names Cal. 630 in a 3372 with centre seconds ([New York lot 436](https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-23-436)). The same manual lists subsidiary seconds for one 3372/3 entry, while Christie's catalogue describes a 3372 with small seconds and a 9¾-ligne, 17-jewel movement but gives no caliber number ([case 474309](https://www.christies.com/lot/rolex-oyster-perpetual-chronometre-bubble-back-ref-5091692/?intObjectID=5091692&lid=1)). Keep those statements tied to their sources; they do not establish a Cal. 630 small-seconds variant.
Line 502: Line 537:
=== Cal. 635 ===
=== Cal. 635 ===


Cal. 635 belongs to the early automatic family related to Cal. 620. General movement references describe a subsidiary-seconds layout, 17 jewels and a larger movement than the 9¾-ligne measurements in two 3130 auction entries. Antiquorum catalogued 3130 cases 54932 and 474617 with Cal. 635, 19 jewels, 9¾ lignes and subsidiary seconds ([lot 256](https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-108-256); [lot 169](https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-108-169)). Christie's identified case 443093 as Cal. 635 with 19 jewels but centre seconds ([2007 lot 2858](https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5008631)). The latter catalogue description conflicts with the usual seconds layout. Without a visible caliber stamp, keep the centre-seconds attribution attached to that lot; do not treat it as a confirmed Cal. 635 variant.
Cal. 635 belongs to the early automatic family related to Cal. 620. General movement references describe a subsidiary-seconds layout, 17 jewels and a larger movement than the 9¾-ligne measurements in two 3130 auction entries. Antiquorum catalogued 3130 cases 54932 and 474617 with Cal. 635, 19 jewels, 9¾ lignes and subsidiary seconds ([lot 256](https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-108-256); [lot 169](https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-108-169)). Christie's identified case 443093 as Cal. 635 with 19 jewels but centre seconds ([2007 lot 2858](https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5008631)). The latter catalogue description conflicts with the usual seconds layout. Without a visible caliber stamp, keep the centre-seconds attribution attached to that lot; do not treat it as a confirmed Cal. 635 variant. Anderson & Garland also attributes manual-wind Cal. 635 to a 5052 with an incomplete 663xxx case serial and movement no. 319xx. Stockholms Auktionsverk's case 663654 photographs show an automatic rotor and list movement no. 31883/F37.519. The similar serial prefix may refer to the same case, but the different movement number and winding descriptions leave the relationship unresolved. [https://www.andersonandgarland.com/auction/lot/lot-421---a-rolex-oyster-perpetual-stainless-steel-wristwatch/?lot=371857&sd=1 Anderson & Garland, lot 421] [https://auctionet.com/fi/2105792-rolex-bubleback-rannekello-teras-automaatti-1950-luku Stockholms Auktionsverk, lot 2105792]


Antiquorum's 2008 catalogue assigns Cal. 635 to ref. [[Reference:3716|3716]], case 156649, and describes a 9¾-ligne, 19-jewel movement. That listing conflicts with the Cal. 620 attribution in Marcus Siems's Empire study; the movement-size description does not by itself establish a numeric caliber. [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-209-284 Antiquorum, lot 284].
Antiquorum's 2008 catalogue assigns Cal. 635 to ref. [[Reference:3716|3716]], case 156649, and describes a 9¾-ligne, 19-jewel movement. That listing conflicts with the Cal. 620 attribution in Marcus Siems's Empire study; the movement-size description does not by itself establish a numeric caliber. [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-209-284 Antiquorum, lot 284].
Line 558: Line 593:


Watches of Knightsbridge catalogues a circa-1952 [[Reference:6056|ref. 6056]] with a 17-jewel manual-wind Cal. 710. Eguchi Vintage lists a separate seller-identified 6056 with partial serial 863*** and also names manual Cal. 710. Neither source provides a movement photograph; Eguchi says its movement was checked only. These are individual catalogue attributions, not verified reference-wide fitment. [https://watchesofknightsbridge.com/auctions/wp-content/uploads/19th-November-2016-SaleResults.pdf Watches of Knightsbridge, 19 November 2016, lot 328]; [https://eguchi-store.jp/stocklist/e21080102/ Eguchi Vintage, ref. 6056 listing]
Watches of Knightsbridge catalogues a circa-1952 [[Reference:6056|ref. 6056]] with a 17-jewel manual-wind Cal. 710. Eguchi Vintage lists a separate seller-identified 6056 with partial serial 863*** and also names manual Cal. 710. Neither source provides a movement photograph; Eguchi says its movement was checked only. These are individual catalogue attributions, not verified reference-wide fitment. [https://watchesofknightsbridge.com/auctions/wp-content/uploads/19th-November-2016-SaleResults.pdf Watches of Knightsbridge, 19 November 2016, lot 328]; [https://eguchi-store.jp/stocklist/e21080102/ Eguchi Vintage, ref. 6056 listing]
Two auction catalogues also assign manual Cal. 710 to ref. [[Reference:4364|4364]]: Dorotheum names it for movement 19229 in a circa-1950 watch, and Meeting Art names it for movement E66008 in case 554633. The second listing is mirrored by Gazette Drouot. These are catalogue attributions to two watches; neither provides a readable movement photograph, so keep the caliber assignment lot-specific. [https://www.dorotheum.com/en/l/10078639/ Dorotheum, 30 April 2026]; [https://www.gazette-drouot.com/ventes-aux-encheres/165819-asta-976-prima-sessione-orologi-moderni-e-d-epoca Meeting Art, 17 May 2025, lot 30]


<span id="cal-600"></span>
<span id="cal-600"></span>
Line 669: Line 706:
|}
|}


A260 powered the first Submariner references, 6204 and 6205, from 1953 to 1955. "A.260" is Rolex's size-family code for this movement class, comparable to the Prince family's "T.S." code. Its non-butterfly rotor distinguishes it from the butterfly-rotor Cal. 1030. Hodinkee traces A260 to a movement used in earlier Oyster Perpetuals and later Bubblebacks, predating its Submariner fitment. The registry uses 17 jewels; some auction descriptions give 19, so the count should be checked against the individual movement.
A260 powered the first Submariner references, 6204 and 6205, from 1953 to 1955. "A.260" is Rolex's size-family code for this movement class, comparable to the Prince family's "T.S." code. Its non-butterfly rotor distinguishes it from the butterfly-rotor Cal. 1030. Hodinkee traces A260 to a movement used in earlier Oyster Perpetuals and later Bubblebacks, predating its Submariner fitment. The registry uses 17 jewels; some auction descriptions give 19, so the count should be checked against the individual movement. Auction catalogues use both labels on ref. [[Reference:6106|6106]] examples: Monaco Legend identifies case 803400 as A260, while Antiquorum names Cal. 645 in a separate 6106. These are specimen-level attributions, consistent with A.260 as a size-family code rather than a unique commercial caliber name.


<span id="cal-a296"></span>
<span id="cal-a296"></span>
Line 758: Line 795:


Jewel counts also vary according to whether a catalogue includes the automatic module. Bonhams describes the related [[#cal-745|Cal. 745]] as "18 jewels plus 7 rotor jewels." Its 20-jewel description of a Cal. 645 in a 6085 should remain attached to that example; it does not establish a universal jewel count.
Jewel counts also vary according to whether a catalogue includes the automatic module. Bonhams describes the related [[#cal-745|Cal. 745]] as "18 jewels plus 7 rotor jewels." Its 20-jewel description of a Cal. 645 in a 6085 should remain attached to that example; it does not establish a universal jewel count.
<span id="cal-720-auto"></span>
=== Cal. 720 (automatic lot attribution) ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:280px; font-size:90%;"
! detail
! value
|-
| type
| Automatic, as catalogued in one ref. 5026
|-
| jewels
| 18, according to Aste Bolaffi lot 4
|-
| other specifications
| Not recorded in the source
|-
| evidence
| Case 443371; no movement photograph
|}
Aste Bolaffi identifies an automatic Cal. 720 with 18 jewels in ref. [[Reference:5026|5026]], case 443371, dated circa 1958. This is one catalogue attribution; the lot has no movement photograph, and the other exact-reference records located do not name a caliber. Keep this use separate from the hand-wound Kew A reports that also use “Cal. 720” for a Cal. 700-based movement or components. [https://www.astebolaffi.it/en/lot/257/4/detail Aste Bolaffi, lot 4] [https://www.bonhams.com/auction/24632/lot/21/ Bonhams, ref. 5056] [https://www.vetroplastica.it/rolex-kew-a-18.html Vetroplastica]


<span id="cal-740"></span>
<span id="cal-740"></span>
Line 812: Line 870:


Keep this A.295 attribution separate from [[#cal-a295-cpl|A.295 CPL]], the complete calendar and moonphase movement catalogued in ref. 8171.
Keep this A.295 attribution separate from [[#cal-a295-cpl|A.295 CPL]], the complete calendar and moonphase movement catalogued in ref. 8171.
Ref. 5029 catalogue descriptions also differ: Hodinkee calls case 610727 A.295, while Phillips calls case 651'517 “Automatic, Super Balance, 730.” Antiquorum describes 9¾-line, 18-jewel movements in cases 673206 and 660596 without a caliber number. The lots do not include movement photographs for those cases, so these labels remain example-specific; the evidence does not support a new caliber entry or a 5029-wide assignment. [https://shop.hodinkee.com/products/1947-rolex-ref-5029-two-tone-oyster-perpetual-big-bubble Hodinkee] [https://www.phillips.com/detail/rolex/87265 Phillips] [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-262-295 Antiquorum, lot 295] [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-242-433 Antiquorum, lot 433]


<span id="cal-745"></span>
<span id="cal-745"></span>
Line 926: Line 986:
The pallet fork runs in jewels, while the escape wheel has shock-mounted settings and cap jewels on both pivots, matching the treatment of the balance. Indirect centre seconds, driven from the fourth wheel through a friction-sprung pinion, can produce seconds-hand flutter even in a healthy movement. The earliest examples may lack shock protection; Antiquorum's 1946 ref. 4560 description names none.
The pallet fork runs in jewels, while the escape wheel has shock-mounted settings and cap jewels on both pivots, matching the treatment of the balance. Indirect centre seconds, driven from the fourth wheel through a friction-sprung pinion, can produce seconds-hand flutter even in a healthy movement. The earliest examples may lack shock protection; Antiquorum's 1946 ref. 4560 description names none.


Documented fitments include refs. 3745, 4560, 6420, 6422, 6426/6427, 6466, 6480, 6482, 6494, 9083 and 9659. Bonhams also records a ref. 6694 with a III.60 caseback date on Cal. 1210.
Documented fitments include refs. 3745, 4560, 6420, 6422, [[Reference:6426|6426]]/6427, 6466, 6480, 6482, 6494, 9083 and 9659. Bonhams also records a ref. 6694 with a III.60 caseback date on Cal. 1210. Vintage Watch Centre also assigns Cal. 1210 to its ref. 4219, case 056827, but no caliber engraving is visible in the movement photo. The dealer dates the case circa 1948; White's Field Manual lists Cal. 1210 as 1954–1964 on PDF page 91. These conflicting attributions remain tied to that one watch. [[Reference:4219|The 4219 article]] records the discrepancy. [https://www.vintagewatchcentre.com/product/rolex-precision-ref-4219-c1948/ Vintage Watch Centre]; [https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/0b5fdf83/files/uploaded/1.0%20RolexBook-23Mar.pdf The Vintage Rolex Field Manual, PDF p. 91].
 
Auction catalogues identify Cal. 1210 in ref. 8952 examples dated circa 1955 and 1956. Phillips also assigns Cal. 1210 to a ref. 8952 dated circa 1945, earlier than the Field Manual’s 1954–1964 range. Keep that date/caliber pair as an unresolved lot attribution. [[Reference:8952|The 8952 article]] records the examples and date conflict. [https://www.sothebys.com/zh/auctions/ecatalogue/2018/important-watches-ge1801/lot.263.html Sotheby’s, lot 263]; [https://www.monacolegendauctions.com/auction/exclusive-timepieces-31/lot-57 Monaco Legend, lot 57]; [https://www.phillips.com/detail/rolex/101135 Phillips, lot 1037]; [https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/0b5fdf83/files/uploaded/1.0%20RolexBook-23Mar.pdf The Vintage Rolex Field Manual, p. 91].


<span id="cal-1215"></span>
<span id="cal-1215"></span>
Line 1,038: Line 1,100:
The higher-beat generation replaces the 1210's screwed Glucydur balance and Breguet overcoil with a smooth-rimmed balance and flat hairspring. Gilt and nickel-plated inertia blocks provide about ten seconds per day of fine adjustment across their range; the index handles larger corrections. Separate regulator, stud-support and regulating-stud parts confirm that this is an index-regulated movement, not a free-sprung one.
The higher-beat generation replaces the 1210's screwed Glucydur balance and Breguet overcoil with a smooth-rimmed balance and flat hairspring. Gilt and nickel-plated inertia blocks provide about ten seconds per day of fine adjustment across their range; the index handles larger corrections. Separate regulator, stud-support and regulating-stud parts confirm that this is an index-regulated movement, not a free-sprung one.


Cal. 1220 appears mainly in the oversize ref. 8029, but its dates conflict. Phillips gives 1950, Antiquorum dates case 714105 to about 1951, and Sotheby's dates that same case to about 1961 without naming its caliber. The earlier dates sit awkwardly beside the later-1960s siblings and remain unresolved. Claims that 1220 movements were commonly signed 1225, including those in later ref. 6426 production, are unverified.
Cal. 1220 appears mainly in the oversize ref. 8029, but its dates conflict. Phillips gives 1950, Antiquorum dates case 714105 to about 1951, and Sotheby's dates that same case to about 1961 without naming its caliber. The earlier dates sit awkwardly beside the later-1960s siblings and remain unresolved. Phillips identifies a late [[Reference:6426|ref. 6426]] movement as RB 1225. That catalogue supports the marking on this watch; whether it began as a Cal. 1220 and was re-marked has not been established.


<span id="cal-1225"></span>
<span id="cal-1225"></span>
Line 1,086: Line 1,148:
For an Oysterdate Precision with Cal. 1225, service requirements depend on the condition of the individual watch. Rolex’s published procedure begins with a watchmaker’s examination and an estimate. It does not promise routine acceptance of every vintage caliber or a particular rate and power reserve after service.
For an Oysterdate Precision with Cal. 1225, service requirements depend on the condition of the individual watch. Rolex’s published procedure begins with a watchmaker’s examination and an estimate. It does not promise routine acceptance of every vintage caliber or a particular rate and power reserve after service.


Documented fitments include refs. 6426, 6466 and, most often, 6694 from the late 1960s through at least 1979. Comparison of a 1966 ref. 6694 with Cal. 1215 and a 1973 example with 1225 places the changeover around 1967.
Documented fitments include [[Reference:6426|ref. 6426]], 6466 and, most often, 6694 from the late 1960s through at least 1979. Comparison of a 1966 ref. 6694 with Cal. 1215 and a 1973 example with 1225 places the changeover around 1967.


<span id="cal-1200"></span>
<span id="cal-1200"></span>
Line 1,168: Line 1,230:
|}
|}


Cal. 1030 is a bidirectionally wound automatic used in 1950s Oyster references. Its 5.85mm profile ended the domed Bubbleback caseback, while the cutaway "butterfly" rotor stamped ROLEX PERPETUAL PATENTED is the usual visual identifier. Finishing includes perlage on the rhodium-plated main plate, brushed bridges, polished screw heads and red anodized-aluminium reversing wheels. A conventional index regulates the movement; the visible regulator arm distinguishes it from the later free-sprung 1560 and 1570. Documented fitments include ref. 6098 from 1952, Oyster Perpetual 6502 and 6567, Submariners 6536, 6536-1 and 6538, Explorer 6610 and Air-King 6552. Artcurial, Antiquorum and Sotheby’s catalogue 6502 examples with Cal. 1030; Watch-Wiki independently lists the association. The case 36701 records conflict: the Invaluable archive of Monaco Legend labels it 6502, while Phillips identifies that case as 6603. The competing catalogue attributions leave its reference unresolved. [https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/rolex-oyster-perpetual-ref-6502-honeycomb-dial-166-c-8e042b2aae Invaluable archive of Monaco Legend, lot 166]; [https://www.phillips.com/detail/rolex/134192 Phillips, lot 254] The Field Manual and several auction catalogues identify Cal. 1030 in Oyster Perpetual 6567 examples; Ineichen lists Cal. 1050 for one 6567. Other catalogues assign Cal. 1050 to refs. 6564, 6569 and Submariner 6536/1. These are descriptions of individual watches; the Cal. 1050 entry records the competing attributions.
Cal. 1030 is a bidirectionally wound automatic used in 1950s Oyster references. Its 5.85mm profile ended the domed Bubbleback caseback, while the cutaway "butterfly" rotor stamped ROLEX PERPETUAL PATENTED is the usual visual identifier. Finishing includes perlage on the rhodium-plated main plate, brushed bridges, polished screw heads and red anodized-aluminium reversing wheels. A conventional index regulates the movement; the visible regulator arm distinguishes it from the later free-sprung 1560 and 1570. Documented fitments include ref. 6098 from 1952, Oyster Perpetual 6502, 6567 and 6584, Submariners 6536, 6536-1 and 6538, Explorer 6610 and Air-King 6552. Artcurial, Antiquorum and Sotheby’s catalogue 6502 examples with Cal. 1030; Watch-Wiki independently lists the association. The case 36701 records conflict: the Invaluable archive of Monaco Legend labels it 6502, while Phillips identifies that case as 6603. The competing catalogue attributions leave its reference unresolved. [https://www.invaluable.com/auction-lot/rolex-oyster-perpetual-ref-6502-honeycomb-dial-166-c-8e042b2aae Invaluable archive of Monaco Legend, lot 166]; [https://www.phillips.com/detail/rolex/134192 Phillips, lot 254] Freeman’s and EBTH catalogue Cal. 1030 in gold [[Reference:6584|ref. 6584]] watches ([https://freemansauction.com/auction/2017-Summer-Edit-Watches-and-Luxury-Accessories/lot/2 Freeman’s, lot 2]; [https://www.ebth.com/items/11312569-vintage-rolex-oyster-perpetual-6584-14k-gold-automatic-wristwatch EBTH, item ITMG535812]). Artcurial’s archived catalogue assigns it to a steel 6584, and Antiquorum to a jointly listed 6080/6584 ([https://www.collectorsquare.com/en/watches/rolex/oyster-perpetual/ref-rolex-6584/lpi Artcurial archive, lot 870]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-242-133 Antiquorum, lot 133]). These are lot-level attributions. The Field Manual and several auction catalogues identify Cal. 1030 in Oyster Perpetual 6567 examples; Ineichen lists Cal. 1050 for one 6567. Other catalogues assign Cal. 1050 to refs. 6564, 6569 and Submariner 6536/1. These are descriptions of individual watches; the Cal. 1050 entry records the competing attributions.


<span id="cal-1035"></span>
<span id="cal-1035"></span>
Line 1,484: Line 1,546:


Gardiner Houlgate catalogues Cal. 1560 in one ref. 1023, serial 1136xxx, dated circa 1964. Time Connection II’s replacement-parts table lists both Cal. 1560 and 1570 under the reference, without dates or a sequence. The auction record documents one Cal. 1560 example; it does not establish when either caliber entered production.
Gardiner Houlgate catalogues Cal. 1560 in one ref. 1023, serial 1136xxx, dated circa 1964. Time Connection II’s replacement-parts table lists both Cal. 1560 and 1570 under the reference, without dates or a sequence. The auction record documents one Cal. 1560 example; it does not establish when either caliber entered production.
Matthew Bain lists Cal. 1560 in its circa-1963 ref. 1026. Time Connection II lists 1560/1570 for 1026 in a replacement-parts table, while Bachmann & Scher gives no caliber. The 1560 identification is one dealer attribution; the parts table is compatibility data, not a documented Cal. 1570 installation or changeover. See [[Reference:1026|ref. 1026]]. [https://www.matthewbaininc.com/product-page/rare-rolex-oyster-perpetual-ref-1026 Matthew Bain Inc., item 28122]; [https://www.timeconnectioninc.com/pages/rolex-case-reference-list-1000-thru-1873 Time Connection II, 1026 row].


Auction catalogues also identify Cal. 1560 in ref. 1024 examples dated circa 1965/66 and circa 1970. Antiquorum lists Cal. 1560 in a ref. 1011 dated 1960, case 546423, and in two lots jointly catalogued as refs. 1010/1011, dated 1960 and 1962. Heritage also lists Cal. 1560 in an undated ref. 1011 sold in 2012. Heritage and Bonhams list Cal. 1560 in individual ref. 1010 lots dated circa 1962 and circa 1967; Antiquorum lists Cal. 1570 in an individual ref. 1010 circa 1968. The Field Manual lists Cal. 1560 for ref. 1010. A 1stDibs item text also names Cal. 1560 for its claimed 1010, though the page title says 1011; treat it as seller-level evidence. These records document both attributions for ref. 1010, and its changeover year remains open; see [[Reference:1010|ref. 1010]]. Antiquorum catalogues Cal. 1560 in ref. 1501 examples dated 1962 (case 761,220) and 1963 (case 953,774); see [[Reference:1501|ref. 1501]], [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-ref-1501-oyster-perpetual-date-lot-386-200 the 1962 lot], and [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-247-67 the 1963 lot].
Auction catalogues also identify Cal. 1560 in ref. 1024 examples dated circa 1965/66 and circa 1970. Antiquorum lists Cal. 1560 in a ref. 1011 dated 1960, case 546423, and in two lots jointly catalogued as refs. 1010/1011, dated 1960 and 1962. Heritage also lists Cal. 1560 in an undated ref. 1011 sold in 2012. Heritage and Bonhams list Cal. 1560 in individual ref. 1010 lots dated circa 1962 and circa 1967; Antiquorum lists Cal. 1570 in an individual ref. 1010 circa 1968. The Field Manual lists Cal. 1560 for ref. 1010. A 1stDibs item text also names Cal. 1560 for its claimed 1010, though the page title says 1011; treat it as seller-level evidence. These records document both attributions for ref. 1010, and its changeover year remains open; see [[Reference:1010|ref. 1010]]. Antiquorum catalogues Cal. 1560 in ref. 1501 examples dated 1962 (case 761,220) and 1963 (case 953,774); see [[Reference:1501|ref. 1501]], [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-ref-1501-oyster-perpetual-date-lot-386-200 the 1962 lot], and [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-247-67 the 1963 lot].
Line 1,522: Line 1,586:
|}
|}


Produced from 1959 to 1965, Cal. 1565 is the early ref. 1675's "caller" GMT movement: its 24-hour hand remains linked to the main hour hand rather than independently adjustable. Rolex kept that layout until Cal. 3085. The 1565 introduced a free-sprung Breguet overcoil with Microstella regulation to this lineage, replacing the index used by earlier sport calibers. Rolex's [https://www.emmywatch.com/wp-content/plugins/watchsearch/inc/documents/rolex--1565--movement_parts.pdf Cal. 1565 parts sheet] describes an automatic calendar movement, shows "1560" engraved on its self-winding bridge, and lists part 7956, the date-indicator seating, for refs. 1500, 1501 and 1503. The [https://www.clubderelojeria.com/comunicaciones/R/ROLEX/rolex1575/ROLEX%201575.pdf Cal. 1575 parts catalogue] lists date-indicator parts for those same case references. The Vintage Rolex Field Manual also lists [[Reference:1500|ref. 1500]] in its Cal. 1565 Date table ([https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/0b5fdf83/files/uploaded/1.0%20RolexBook-23Mar.pdf The Vintage Rolex Field Manual, caliber table]). These factory lists document service-parts applications; movement-level inspection determines the caliber fitted to a particular watch. Auction catalogues call ref. 1501 Cal. 1560 or 1570, matching the bridge numbers shown in the 1565 and 1575 parts sheets. The records leave watch-specific fitment and changeover years unresolved. See [[Reference:1500|ref. 1500]], [[Reference:1501|ref. 1501]] and [[Reference:1503|ref. 1503]].
Produced from 1959 to 1965, Cal. 1565 is the early ref. 1675's "caller" GMT movement: its 24-hour hand remains linked to the main hour hand rather than independently adjustable. Rolex kept that layout until Cal. 3085. The 1565 introduced a free-sprung Breguet overcoil with Microstella regulation to this lineage, replacing the index used by earlier sport calibers. Rolex's [https://www.emmywatch.com/wp-content/plugins/watchsearch/inc/documents/rolex--1565--movement_parts.pdf Cal. 1565 parts sheet] describes an automatic calendar movement, shows "1560" engraved on its self-winding bridge, and lists part 7956, the date-indicator seating, for refs. 1500, 1501 and 1503. The [https://www.clubderelojeria.com/comunicaciones/R/ROLEX/rolex1575/ROLEX%201575.pdf Cal. 1575 parts catalogue] lists date-indicator parts for those same case references. The Vintage Rolex Field Manual also lists [[Reference:1500|ref. 1500]] in its Cal. 1565 Date table ([https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/0b5fdf83/files/uploaded/1.0%20RolexBook-23Mar.pdf The Vintage Rolex Field Manual, caliber table]). These factory lists document service-parts applications; movement-level inspection determines the caliber fitted to a particular watch. Auction catalogues call refs. 1501 and 1507 Cal. 1560 or 1570, matching the bridge numbers shown in the 1565 and 1575 parts sheets. For the 1507, the auction examples include joint 1503/1507 attributions; no movement photograph confirms the exact caliber. The records leave watch-specific fitment and changeover years unresolved. See [[Reference:1500|ref. 1500]], [[Reference:1501|ref. 1501]], [[Reference:1503|ref. 1503]] and [[Reference:1507|ref. 1507]].


<span id="cal-1570"></span>
<span id="cal-1570"></span>
Line 1,556: Line 1,620:
|}
|}


Cal. 1570 is the 19,800-vph revision of the 1560, introduced in 1965. Christie’s identifies Cal. 1570 in ref. 1011 case 692498, dated circa 1962; its lot chronology overlaps the ref. 1011 Cal. 1560 examples and does not establish a changeover. See [[Reference:1011|ref. 1011]]. Monaco Legend lists Cal. 1570 in a 1966 pink-gold 1013, Gazette Drouot in a circa-1968 example and Rago in a 1978 example. The 1013 records document both calibers but leave their changeover unresolved. See [[Reference:1013|ref. 1013]]. One Artcurial ref. 1005 lot is catalogued with Cal. 1550, despite a chronometer-dial description; other 1005 catalogues list 1560 or 1570. This single lot does not establish a 1005 movement variant or resolve whether the movement is original. It retains the free-sprung Breguet overcoil and Microstella regulation, with adjustment to temperature and five positions. Family-wide bridge engraving causes date movements such as the 1575 in a ref. 1665 to appear marked 1570; the engraving alone does not identify the exact caliber. Phillips identifies Cal. 1570 in a circa-1985 ref. 1024, while Dorotheum lists it on a circa-1965/70 example; those ref. 1024 dates overlap its Cal. 1560 records. Christie’s, Antiquorum, Phillips, Dorotheum and Bonhams also catalogue Cal. 1570 in ref. 1501 examples; see [[Reference:1501|ref. 1501]]. These lot labels do not establish a 1501 changeover year.
Cal. 1570 is the 19,800-vph revision of the 1560, introduced in 1965. Christie’s identifies Cal. 1570 in ref. 1011 case 692498, dated circa 1962; its lot chronology overlaps the ref. 1011 Cal. 1560 examples and does not establish a changeover. See [[Reference:1011|ref. 1011]]. Monaco Legend lists Cal. 1570 in a 1966 pink-gold 1013, Gazette Drouot in a circa-1968 example and Rago in a 1978 example. The 1013 records document both calibers but leave their changeover unresolved. See [[Reference:1013|ref. 1013]]. One Artcurial ref. 1005 lot is catalogued with Cal. 1550, despite a chronometer-dial description; other 1005 catalogues list 1560 or 1570. This single lot does not establish a 1005 movement variant or resolve whether the movement is original. It retains the free-sprung Breguet overcoil and Microstella regulation, with adjustment to temperature and five positions. Family-wide bridge engraving causes date movements such as the 1575 in a ref. 1665 to appear marked 1570; the engraving alone does not identify the exact caliber. Phillips identifies Cal. 1570 in a circa-1985 ref. 1024, while Dorotheum lists it on a circa-1965/70 example; those ref. 1024 dates overlap its Cal. 1560 records. Christie’s, Antiquorum, Phillips, Dorotheum and Bonhams also catalogue Cal. 1570 in ref. 1501 examples; see [[Reference:1501|ref. 1501]]. These lot labels do not establish a 1501 changeover year. Heritage (circa 1960; its case serial conflicts with the chart date), Christie's (circa 1969 and 1977), Sotheby's (circa 1977 and 1978), and Cambi (circa 1971, with a disputed all-steel attribution) identify Cal. 1570 in individual ref. 1505 watches. These lot descriptions document reported fitment, not a reference-wide caliber rule or changeover. See [[Reference:1505|ref. 1505]]. [https://jewelry.ha.com/itm/timepieces/wristwatch/rolex-ref-1505-early-two-tone-oyster-perpetual-date-circa-1960/a/5563-54188.s Heritage]; [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-5257457 Christie's]; [https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/christies-watches-online/rolex-two-tone-date-ref-1505-227/67553 Christie's]; [https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2024/fine-watches/date-reference-1505-montre-bracelet-en-acier-et-or Sotheby's]; [https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2023/fine-watches-2/reference-1505-oyster-perpetual-date-a-yellow-gold Sotheby's]; [https://www.cambiaste.com/uploads/auctions/1081-cambi_orologi_999_2024_12_eb.pdf Cambi]. Phillips identifies Cal. 1570 in the white-gold ref. [[Reference:1504|1504]] sold in 2016; Eguchi lists the caliber, and the photographed W3674 example shows the same bridge marking in a yellow-gold watch. These records document individual watches, not a caliber changeover. [https://www.dist.phillips.com/content/web/auctions/HK080216/HK080216_zh_1.pdf Phillips, lot 1068] [https://eguchi-store.jp/stocklist/287626/ Eguchi, item 287626] [https://bulangandsons.de/products/rolex-oyster-perpetual-date-grey-brick-dial-moreau-finish-with-brick-bracelet-ref-1504-in-18-k-yellow-gold-w3674 W3674 item listing].


Waddington’s lists Cal. 1570 in ref. 1023/8B and dates it circa 1964. That estimate predates the 1965 start date used here for Cal. 1570; Pergola’s unofficial chart places serial 902827 in 1962. Hess and Watch.de identify Cal. 1570 on other 1023 listings, and a 2022 Rolex Forums photograph shows a rotor marked 1570 inside an outer case stamped 1023. Kaplans also lists Cal. 1570 for serial 2,186,841; Watch.de masks its serial as 2186xxx, and their other matching details suggest a repeat listing. These records document the caliber on individual watches, but they do not establish first fitment or a changeover; see [[Reference:1023|1023]].
Waddington’s lists Cal. 1570 in ref. 1023/8B and dates it circa 1964. That estimate predates the 1965 start date used here for Cal. 1570; Pergola’s unofficial chart places serial 902827 in 1962. Hess and Watch.de identify Cal. 1570 on other 1023 listings, and a 2022 Rolex Forums photograph shows a rotor marked 1570 inside an outer case stamped 1023. Kaplans also lists Cal. 1570 for serial 2,186,841; Watch.de masks its serial as 2186xxx, and their other matching details suggest a repeat listing. These records document the caliber on individual watches, but they do not establish first fitment or a changeover; see [[Reference:1023|1023]].
Line 1,599: Line 1,663:
Rolex engraved the 1575 bridge "1570," so that marking on a ref. 1680 or 1675 identifies the caliber family. Factory parts records distinguish 1565G, 1575, 1575G and 1575GMT. Date and GMT versions are separately catalogued builds, and the GMT parts also circulated as a conversion set for a standard 1560 or 1570.
Rolex engraved the 1575 bridge "1570," so that marking on a ref. 1680 or 1675 identifies the caliber family. Factory parts records distinguish 1565G, 1575, 1575G and 1575GMT. Date and GMT versions are separately catalogued builds, and the GMT parts also circulated as a conversion set for a standard 1560 or 1570.


The 1575 shares factory balance assembly 8106 with the 1570 and related family members. It has shock protection on the escape wheel on both dial and movement sides, as well as on the balance. The Vintage Rolex Field Manual lists [[Reference:1500|ref. 1500]] as a Date fitment in its Cal. 1575 table ([https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/0b5fdf83/files/uploaded/1.0%20RolexBook-23Mar.pdf The Vintage Rolex Field Manual, caliber table]); a [https://www.clubderelojeria.com/comunicaciones/R/ROLEX/rolex1575/ROLEX%201575.pdf Rolex Cal. 1575 parts catalogue] lists date-indicator parts for refs. 1500, 1501 and 1503. Auction catalogues more often describe 1500 examples as Cal. 1570. [https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/watch-review/vintage-week-rolex-oyster-perpetual-chronometer-date-ref-1500.html Bob’s Watches] explains the 1570 bridge engraving on date-equipped 1575-family movements; the engraving alone does not establish the caliber beneath it. The available records do not identify a watch-specific changeover. Other documented fitments include the Submariner 1680, GMT-Master 1675 from about the 1.4-million serial range, Explorer II 1655 and Sea-Dweller 1665.
The 1575 shares factory balance assembly 8106 with the 1570 and related family members. It has shock protection on the escape wheel on both dial and movement sides, as well as on the balance. The Vintage Rolex Field Manual lists [[Reference:1500|ref. 1500]] as a Date fitment in its Cal. 1575 table ([https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/0b5fdf83/files/uploaded/1.0%20RolexBook-23Mar.pdf The Vintage Rolex Field Manual, caliber table]); a [https://www.clubderelojeria.com/comunicaciones/R/ROLEX/rolex1575/ROLEX%201575.pdf Rolex Cal. 1575 parts catalogue] lists date-indicator parts for refs. 1500, 1501 and 1503. Auction catalogues more often describe 1500 examples as Cal. 1570. [https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/watch-review/vintage-week-rolex-oyster-perpetual-chronometer-date-ref-1500.html Bob’s Watches] explains the 1570 bridge engraving on date-equipped 1575-family movements; the engraving alone does not establish the caliber beneath it. The available records do not identify a watch-specific changeover. For ref. [[Reference:1506|1506]], two auction catalogues identify Cal. 1570; one seller lists 1575 although its movement photograph shows a 1570-marked bridge. The inner caseback in that photograph is stamped 1503. These are object-level records and do not establish a caliber sequence for the reference. Other documented fitments include the Submariner 1680, GMT-Master 1675 from about the 1.4-million serial range, Explorer II 1655 and Sea-Dweller 1665. Auction catalogues identify the date-equipped [[Reference:1510|ref. 1510]] as Cal. 1570, and Monaco Legend’s movement photo shows a 1570-marked bridge with 26 jewels. The cited parts lists contain no ref. 1510 entry. Cal. 1570 remains the auction-house attribution, and the photographed marking is object-level evidence; exact reference fitment is unconfirmed.


<span id="gmt-branch"></span>
<span id="gmt-branch"></span>
Line 1,888: Line 1,952:


Rolex introduced Cal. 3186 as a running change, leaving its start date unsettled. Steel 16710 examples begin among late Z- and M-series cases; the lowest documented example is Z 5786xx, but higher Z-series watches can still contain Cal. 3185. Gold references changed earlier. A D-series 116718 catalogued with Cal. 3186 was sold in August 2006, placing the movement in production before the commonly cited 2007 steel transition.
Rolex introduced Cal. 3186 as a running change, leaving its start date unsettled. Steel 16710 examples begin among late Z- and M-series cases; the lowest documented example is Z 5786xx, but higher Z-series watches can still contain Cal. 3185. Gold references changed earlier. A D-series 116718 catalogued with Cal. 3186 was sold in August 2006, placing the movement in production before the commonly cited 2007 steel transition.
Auction catalogues conflict on the 116758 SARU. Christie's assigns Cal. 3185 to examples dated circa 2006 and 2007 ([https://www.christies.com.cn/lot/lot-6042618 lot 6042618]; [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6248960 lot 6248960]); Sotheby's assigns Cal. 3186 to a circa-2007 watch ([https://sothebys-com.brightspotcdn.com/2c/4a/bc2f942e47408a9fdafa1930caff/ge2301-important-watches-part-i.pdf lot 45]). Phillips ([https://www.phillips.com/detail/rolex/CH080220/14 lot 14]) and a later Christie's lot ([https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6167024 lot 6167024]) also list 3186. Rolex's [https://www.minus4plus6.com/pdf/Rolex2008.pdf 2008 US catalogue] specifies a 31-jewel chronometer without a calibre number. These records leave the reference's movement transition undated.


Both Cal. 3185 and 3186 index the local-hour hand with a jumping-hour click. Cal. 3186 reworked the parts and reduced slack between the drive-train wheels. On Cal. 3185, the 24-hour hand twitches when the local hour jumps; on Cal. 3186, it remains still. Treat this as a screening clue and confirm the caliber by inspecting the movement.
Both Cal. 3185 and 3186 index the local-hour hand with a jumping-hour click. Cal. 3186 reworked the parts and reduced slack between the drive-train wheels. On Cal. 3185, the 24-hour hand twitches when the local hour jumps; on Cal. 3186, it remains still. Treat this as a screening clue and confirm the caliber by inspecting the movement.
Line 2,005: Line 2,071:


Cal. 3035 ran from 1977 to 1988 in the 16800, 168000, 16808, and 16803. It was the first quickset Submariner caliber, with 27 jewels, a 28,800 vph frequency, 48 hours of reserve, hacking, and chronometer certification. Compared with the Cal. 1570 generation, it increased frequency from 19,800 vph and added a crown position that advances the date wheel directly. Its free-sprung Nivarox Breguet overcoil is regulated by four Microstella screws and protected by KIF Elastor.
Cal. 3035 ran from 1977 to 1988 in the 16800, 168000, 16808, and 16803. It was the first quickset Submariner caliber, with 27 jewels, a 28,800 vph frequency, 48 hours of reserve, hacking, and chronometer certification. Compared with the Cal. 1570 generation, it increased frequency from 19,800 vph and added a crown position that advances the date wheel directly. Its free-sprung Nivarox Breguet overcoil is regulated by four Microstella screws and protected by KIF Elastor.
Exact-reference auction catalogues identify Cal. 3035 in Datejust ref. [[Reference:16003|16003]] and Oyster Perpetual Date ref. [[Reference:15003|15003]] examples. Christie's and Noonans name Cal. 3035 in their 15003 lots. The 1977–1988 dates above apply to the listed Submariner references, not to the caliber’s full use across Rolex models. [https://www.dorotheum.com/en/l/1075885/ Dorotheum, case 5,880,264]; [https://www.kaplans.se/en/auktioner/3664?p=20 Kaplans, serial 5,230,455]; [https://www.bidsquare.com/online-auctions/morton-subastas/rolex-oyster-perpetual-datejust-steel-and-14k-yellow-gold-ref-16003-ca-1978-1613056 Morton, lot 134]; [https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/christies-watches-online-keystone-collection/rolex-two-tone-date-chevron-ref-15003-187/73507 Christie's, 15003 lot 187]; [https://www.noonans.co.uk/archive/past-catalogues/681/catalogue/457378/?offset=440 Noonans, 15003 lot 441].


Two construction details separate it from Cal. 3135. Its balance sits on a cantilevered cock, and its hairspring is glued to the stud. Cal. 3135 uses a bridge anchored at both ends and a laser-welded hairspring stud.
Two construction details separate it from Cal. 3135. Its balance sits on a cantilevered cock, and its hairspring is glued to the stud. Cal. 3135 uses a bridge anchored at both ends and a laser-welded hairspring stud.
Line 2,813: Line 2,881:
|}
|}


Cal. 1556 succeeded the 1555 around 1965 and powered the mid- and late four-digit Day-Date until 1977 or 1978. A revised gear train raised the frequency, while a jewel at the top of the centre wheel brought the count to 26. Its rhodium-plated movement has perlage finishing, a full balance bridge and a screwed balance with two gold, star-shaped Microstella regulating screws. Hacking was added during production in 1972 without a new caliber designation; earlier examples do not hack.
Cal. 1556 succeeded the 1555 around 1965 and powered the mid- and late four-digit Day-Date until 1977 or 1978. A revised gear train raised the frequency, while a jewel at the top of the centre wheel brought the count to 26. Its rhodium-plated movement has perlage finishing, a full balance bridge and a screwed balance with two gold, star-shaped Microstella regulating screws. Hacking was added during production in 1972 without a new caliber designation; earlier examples do not hack. Sotheby’s 2024 listing for [[Reference:1601|ref. 1601]] assigns Cal. 1556 to a watch described and photographed with a date-only dial. Rolex’s 1978 [https://www.vrfm.io/Scans/TECHNICAL-SERVICE-INFO-3RD-EDITION-1978.pdf service manual] defines Cal. 1556 as day-and-date, so this remains a catalogue conflict until the movement is inspected. [https://www.sothebys.com/en/buy/auction/2024/important-watches-2/reference-1601-datejust-a-yellow-gold-automatic Sotheby’s, lot 130].


<span id="cal-1566"></span>
<span id="cal-1566"></span>
Line 3,104: Line 3,172:
* [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6185890 Christie’s: 6062 case 916321, caliber 655]
* [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6185890 Christie’s: 6062 case 916321, caliber 655]
* [https://www.astebolaffi.it/en/lot/261/34/detail Aste Bolaffi, ref. 1858 lot 34 — movement no. 1143 identified as Hunter 8¾ (520)]
* [https://www.astebolaffi.it/en/lot/261/34/detail Aste Bolaffi, ref. 1858 lot 34 — movement no. 1143 identified as Hunter 8¾ (520)]
* [https://www.watchnet.co.jp/en/item/view/5300 WatchNet Japan, product A-6378 — seller-attributed Cal. 520]
* [https://www.watchnet.co.jp/en/item/view/5300 WatchNet Japan, product A-6378 — seller-attributed Cal. 520] [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-108-253 Antiquorum, ref. 6006, lot 253]
* [https://www.vintageandprestige.com/product/rolex-oyster-perpetual-bubbleback-1858/ Vintage & Prestige, stock W2107 — seller-listed Cal. 520 / 8¾]
* [https://www.vintageandprestige.com/product/rolex-oyster-perpetual-bubbleback-1858/ Vintage & Prestige, stock W2107 — seller-listed Cal. 520 / 8¾]
* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/the-rolex-bubbleback-and-why-it-still-matters Anthony Traina, Hodinkee, “The Rolex Bubbleback and Why It Still Matters”, 7 October 2024 — movement-family account]
* [https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/the-rolex-bubbleback-and-why-it-still-matters Anthony Traina, Hodinkee, “The Rolex Bubbleback and Why It Still Matters”, 7 October 2024 — movement-family account]
Line 3,247: Line 3,315:
* [https://www.darlor-watch.com/rolex_watches_3.html Darlor, dealer-described 3351-F, serial 118,489, Cal. 59]
* [https://www.darlor-watch.com/rolex_watches_3.html Darlor, dealer-described 3351-F, serial 118,489, Cal. 59]
* [https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-3057585 Christie's, ref. 3351 Extra Precision, Extra Prima]
* [https://www.christies.com/lot/lot-3057585 Christie's, ref. 3351 Extra Precision, Extra Prima]
* [https://www.christies.com.cn/lot/lot-6042618 Christie's, ref. 116758 SARU, circa-2006, Cal. 3185 attributed]
* [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6248960 Christie's, ref. 116758 SARU, circa-2007, Cal. 3185 attributed]
* [https://sothebys-com.brightspotcdn.com/2c/4a/bc2f942e47408a9fdafa1930caff/ge2301-important-watches-part-i.pdf Sotheby's, ref. 116758 with SARU bezel, circa-2007, Cal. 3186 attributed]
* [https://www.phillips.com/detail/rolex/CH080220/14 Phillips, ref. 116758 SARU, circa-2009, Cal. 3186 attributed]
* [https://www.christies.com/en/lot/lot-6167024 Christie's, ref. 116758 SARU, circa-2010, Cal. 3186 attributed]
* [https://www.minus4plus6.com/pdf/Rolex2008.pdf Rolex USA, 2008 catalogue, 31-jewel chronometer specification without calibre number]