Reference:6105: Difference between revisions

[checked revision][checked revision]
Deep correctness and anti-slop audit: reduce repeated Datejust prose, soften movement/authentication claims, add direct auction sources and family link
Remove redlink and tighten Datejust authentication guidance
 
Line 12: Line 12:
}}
}}


<small>[[Reference:datejust|Datejust]] → '''6105'''</small>
<small>Datejust → '''6105'''</small>


<div class="rp-lead">
<div class="rp-lead">
Line 122: Line 122:


Dial feet position is the defining 6105-versus-4467 authentication check. A.295 and A.296 dial feet sit in different positions, and a 6105 dial on a 4467 movement (or vice versa) is not period-correct.  
Dial feet position is the defining 6105-versus-4467 authentication check. A.295 and A.296 dial feet sit in different positions, and a 6105 dial on a 4467 movement (or vice versa) is not period-correct.  
Dial text: "Datejust" above six is the reference-defining feature. Some dealers list Ovettone-era watches as 6105 when the dial lacks "Datejust" text, a catalog error rather than a rare variant. A 6105 without "Datejust" on the dial needs explanation.
Dial text: "Datejust" above six is the reference-defining feature. A 6105 listing without that text needs an explanation, such as a replacement dial, a case mismatch or a catalogue error.


Case material is 18K yellow, 18K pink, or documented two-tone. A steel-only 6105 needs scrutiny against period documentation; the Ovettone bias toward gold is consistent with the 4467 era and only genuinely breaks with the 6305 that follows.
Case material is 18K yellow, 18K pink, or documented two-tone. A steel-only 6105 needs scrutiny against period documentation; the Ovettone bias toward gold is consistent with the 4467 era and only genuinely breaks with the 6305 that follows.