Rolexopedia

Reference:6694: Difference between revisions

[checked revision][checked revision]
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Convert 1 legacy image(s) to WebP
Correct 6426 comparison and production-date wording
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
</div>
</div>


The 6694 is the last of the four manual-wind Oysterdate references and by a wide margin the most numerous. A 34 mm steel Oyster, a date at three under a cyclops, a hand-wound Rolex caliber from the 1200 family, and no rotor — that is the whole watch. Documented examples run from about 1959 to about 1986, and new old stock was still leaving authorised dealers in 1989. For thirty years it was the cheapest way into a waterproof Rolex on a bracelet, and Rolex sold it accordingly.
The 6694 is the last of the four manual-wind Oysterdate references and one of the longest-running manual-wind Oysterdate references. A 34 mm steel Oyster, a date at three under a cyclops, a hand-wound Rolex caliber from the 1200 family, and no rotor — that is the whole watch. Documented examples run from about 1959 to about 1986, and new old stock was still leaving authorised dealers in 1989. It was sold in several case and dial configurations, including steel, plated and capped examples.


The 6694 is the most frequently mis-catalogued vintage Rolex in the mid-market. Four of the six major auction houses have described 6694 lots as automatic, and every one of those attributions contradicts its own movement field; no lot at any house names an automatic Rolex caliber. The reference has also acquired a distinction it cannot support — that it was the last manual-wind Rolex ever made — which Rolex's own product pages refute. These claims recur in auction and dealer descriptions.
Auction catalogues sometimes misidentify the winding system on this reference. Several auction entries use “automatic” in a title or prose line while their movement fields identify manual calibers, including the Christie’s lot whose specification states manual caliber 1225. The reference has also acquired a distinction it cannot support — that it was the last manual-wind Rolex ever made — which Rolex's own product pages refute. These claims recur in auction and dealer descriptions.


==Core facts==
==Core facts==
Line 78: Line 78:
The Oysterdate ran as a four-reference sequence — 6094, then 6294, then 6494, then 6694 — and the 6694 outlived the other three put together. The introduction is usually given as 1958, replacing the 6094 and 6494, but that date rests on dealer and marketplace copy with no primary citation behind it, and one collector-forum account offered explicitly as belief rather than documentation. The 1958 introduction has not been confirmed from a period Rolex catalogue. What can be shown is that the earliest example whose case number agrees with its catalogue date is a 1959 watch.
The Oysterdate ran as a four-reference sequence — 6094, then 6294, then 6494, then 6694 — and the 6694 outlived the other three put together. The introduction is usually given as 1958, replacing the 6094 and 6494, but that date rests on dealer and marketplace copy with no primary citation behind it, and one collector-forum account offered explicitly as belief rather than documentation. The 1958 introduction has not been confirmed from a period Rolex catalogue. What can be shown is that the earliest example whose case number agrees with its catalogue date is a 1959 watch.


[[File:Ref 6694 with 6426.webp|thumb|right|280px|alt=A Rolex Oyster 6426 and an Oysterdate 6694 in stainless steel shown side by side on leather straps|The 6426 and the 6694 as Antiquorum offered them, together in one lot catalogued "ROLEX, REF. 6426/ 6694, OYSTER AND OYSTERDATE, STEEL". Same case, same base caliber; the date is the whole difference.]]
[[File:Ref 6694 with 6426.webp|thumb|right|280px|alt=A Rolex Oyster 6426 and an Oysterdate 6694 in stainless steel shown side by side on leather straps|A no-date Oyster Precision 6426 and date-equipped Oysterdate Precision 6694, catalogued together by Antiquorum.]]


Two neighbours matter for identification. The 6426 is the same watch without the date — same case, same base caliber, same bracelet — and Antiquorum has offered the pair together in a single lot, catalogued as "ROLEX, REF. 6426/ 6694, OYSTER AND OYSTERDATE, STEEL". The other is the Oyster Perpetual Date 1500, 1501 and 1503: a 34 mm steel Oyster with a date and a cyclops, visually near-identical across a display tray, and genuinely automatic on calibers 1560, 1565 and 1570. That second pairing is the likeliest source of the winding confusion that runs through the auction record.
Two related manual-wind Oysters sit beside the 6694. The 6426 has no date; the 6694 adds one. Auction catalogues identify overlapping calibres across these references, so the date alone does not identify the movement. Antiquorum has offered a 6426 and a 6694 together as a pair. The other useful comparison is the automatic Oyster Perpetual Date 1500, 1501 and 1503, a 34 mm steel Oyster with a date and cyclops. Its calibres are 1560, 1565 and 1570, and it is a more plausible source for auction-title confusion about winding.


==Production outline==
==Production outline==
Line 102: Line 102:
Rolex sold manual-wind watches for roughly a quarter century after the 6694 left the catalogue. Its own product pages for the Cellini Rolex Prince, live through December 2014, carry a section headed "Wound by hand" and read: "The Prince features a manually-wound mechanical movement - the 7040 calibre - specially developed and manufactured by Rolex." The specification block on the same pages gives "Manually wound mechanical movement" and "Calibre 7040, Manufacture Rolex". That is the manufacturer describing current production, and it settles the point.
Rolex sold manual-wind watches for roughly a quarter century after the 6694 left the catalogue. Its own product pages for the Cellini Rolex Prince, live through December 2014, carry a section headed "Wound by hand" and read: "The Prince features a manually-wound mechanical movement - the 7040 calibre - specially developed and manufactured by Rolex." The specification block on the same pages gives "Manually wound mechanical movement" and "Calibre 7040, Manufacture Rolex". That is the manufacturer describing current production, and it settles the point.


The narrower version — that the 6694 is the last manual-wind Rolex in the Oyster case — is not yet provable either. The 6426 shares the case, the caliber and the bracelet, and no source consulted dates the end of its production. Until the 6426 is dated, the 6694 cannot be called the last of anything.
Phillips dates a 6426 case, R492,864, to circa 1987; the latest cited 6694 cases are dated circa 1986. These are dates assigned to individual watches, not factory production endpoints. The two references share an Oyster case family and manual 1200-series movements, though auction catalogues give overlapping caliber attributions. The evidence leaves open which manual-wind Oyster reference ended later.


==Movement notes==
==Movement notes==
Line 222: Line 222:
</gallery>
</gallery>


Case 828496's own identity needs a caveat. Antiquorum's lot catalogues it as a 6694, and the dial in view reads "Oysterdate" and carries a date function, consistent with that. But the same lot's caseback photography reads 6426 — the no-date sibling — not 6694. Given the 6426 and 6694 share an identical case and bracelet, this is either a service-era caseback swap between the two closely related references or a cataloguing mismatch on Antiquorum's part; either way, this specific example should not be read as a clean, fully-confirmed 6694 without further authentication.
Case 828496's identity remains unsettled. Antiquorum catalogues it as a 6694, and the pictured dial reads 'Oysterdate' and shows a date. Its caseback photograph reads 6426. The related references use the Oyster case design, so a caseback change is possible; a catalogue mismatch is also possible. The record does not distinguish between them, and the watch should not be used as a clean 6694 example without further authentication.


Markers run from applied faceted gilt chevrons and arrowheads on the earliest watches to the applied polished batons that dominate the middle and late run. Hands follow: dauphine early, then pointed batons with luminous inserts as the standard, with gilt daggers, alpha and — on at least one catalogued example — Mercedes hands appearing across the range.
Markers run from applied faceted gilt chevrons and arrowheads on the earliest watches to the applied polished batons that dominate the middle and late run. Hands follow: dauphine early, then pointed batons with luminous inserts as the standard, with gilt daggers, alpha and — on at least one catalogued example — Mercedes hands appearing across the range.
Line 304: Line 304:
==Case, bezel, crystal, and crown==
==Case, bezel, crystal, and crown==


[[File:Ref 6694 hero.webp|thumb|right|340px|alt=Rolex Oysterdate Precision reference 6694 in stainless steel with a silvered baton dial on a riveted Oyster bracelet|The default configuration: 34 mm steel Oyster, silvered dial with polished baton markers, date at three under a cyclops. Case 1840635, caliber 1225, inside back coded II.68, on a riveted 7205 bracelet.]]
The case is a three-piece Oyster, tonneau in profile, with a screw-down back and a screw-down crown. The crown is a single-seal design rather than a two-seal Twinlock, a detail that matters in service — an oversized replacement O-ring is a common reason a 6694 crown will not seat fully. The crystal is acrylic with a moulded cyclops. The bezel is smooth and polished on steel examples, and engine-turned or fluted on the gold-cased variants.
The case is a three-piece Oyster, tonneau in profile, with a screw-down back and a screw-down crown. The crown is a single-seal design rather than a two-seal Twinlock, a detail that matters in service — an oversized replacement O-ring is a common reason a 6694 crown will not seat fully. The crystal is acrylic with a moulded cyclops. The bezel is smooth and polished on steel examples, and engine-turned or fluted on the gold-cased variants.


Line 351: Line 350:
==Auction record==
==Auction record==


The 6694 is a four-figure watch in plain configuration and a five-figure one when the dial carries an emblem. Special-order dials account for the largest premiums in the results below.
The results below are individual sales. They show how dial, provenance and condition affected those lots; they do not establish a general market range.


{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
Line 392: Line 391:
|}
|}


These results span two decades and five currencies, so no single figure is presented as the reference's record. Plain steel examples in the same sale rooms generally settle between the low four figures and about USD 3,000, and the Mellon results show what a provenance and a Tiffany signature do to that baseline — five watches estimated at USD 1,500 to 2,000 apiece all sold at three to five times the low estimate.
These results span two decades and five currencies. The sale descriptions identify the watches and their documented details; they should not be read as a price guide for every 6694.


Two watches in the record appear twice each, re-offered at the same house within months, which is worth knowing before treating lot counts as population counts.
Two watches in the record appear twice each, re-offered at the same house within months, which is worth knowing before treating lot counts as population counts.
Line 402: Line 401:
Match the caliber to the era. A 1215 on an early-1960s serial and a 1225 on anything after the mid-1960s are both period-correct; the reverse combination needs explaining. Match the dial footer too: SWISS alone with radium on the earliest watches, T SWISS T after 1963.
Match the caliber to the era. A 1215 on an early-1960s serial and a 1225 on anything after the mid-1960s are both period-correct; the reverse combination needs explaining. Match the dial footer too: SWISS alone with radium on the earliest watches, T SWISS T after 1963.


Treat any coloured dial as a question rather than a feature until it is verified, and treat a Mickey Mouse dial as a refinish, because that is what the houses selling them say it is. Check a stated case diameter against an actual measurement. And read the word "automatic" in a lot title as a cataloguing error, then check the movement field, which will almost always say otherwise.
Treat any coloured dial as a question until its finish and provenance are checked. Auction catalogues describe the Mickey Mouse examples cited here as later or refinished dials. Check a stated case diameter against an actual measurement. And read the word "automatic" in a lot title as a cataloguing error, then check the movement field, which will almost always say otherwise.


== Related references ==
== Related references ==


* Oyster Precision 6426 — the same watch without the date (article pending)
* [[Reference:6426|Oyster Precision 6426]] — no-date sibling
* [[Reference:3003|Precision 3003]] — where the Precision line begins
* [[Reference:3003|Precision 3003]] — where the Precision line begins


Retrieved from "https://rolexopedia.net/wiki/Reference:6694"