Reference:3458: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Clarify Italian nickname and condition wording in deep audit |
Remove unsupported ranking language from collecting notes |
||
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
Across a fifteen-year run and a dozen dial configurations the 3458's dial corpus is wide enough that period-plausible refinishes are common. Dial originality requires comparison of font, printing, luminous material, hands, and any available provenance. Matching lume can support an assessment but does not prove originality, and the checked sources do not establish what proportion of surviving 3458 dials were refinished. | Across a fifteen-year run and a dozen dial configurations the 3458's dial corpus is wide enough that period-plausible refinishes are common. Dial originality requires comparison of font, printing, luminous material, hands, and any available provenance. Matching lume can support an assessment but does not prove originality, and the checked sources do not establish what proportion of surviving 3458 dials were refinished. | ||
Solid pink-gold examples need case-metal and hallmark verification. The cited sample is too small to rank | Solid pink-gold examples need case-metal and hallmark verification. The cited sample is too small to rank their value or forgery frequency. A seller offering a pink-gold example should provide hallmark photography, caseback weight documentation, and, where possible, period provenance through an Italian or Swiss retailer. Some catalogues describe 19-jewel Chronometre-grade movements. If a watch is sold with that description, the movement markings, dial text, and any certificate should be checked rather than assumed from the reference. | ||
A Serpico y Laino signature should be assessed through its typography, dial printing, case, and provenance. The cited material does not establish how often the signature was forged, so it should be treated as one authentication question among several. | A Serpico y Laino signature should be assessed through its typography, dial printing, case, and provenance. The cited material does not establish how often the signature was forged, so it should be treated as one authentication question among several. | ||