Reference:14010M: Difference between revisions

Line 38:

|-

| production

| 2000/01–2006; Monochrome and Marcus Siems read 2000–2006, Watch-Wiki ~~and Gray & Sons~~ 2000–2007, Ross Povey puts the M cutover at 2001

| 2000/01–2006; Monochrome and Marcus Siems read 2000–2006, Watch-Wiki 2000–2007, Ross Povey puts the M cutover at 2001

|-

| case

Line 85:

==Where it sits in the line==

Rolex built the modern Air-King in matched pairs, one smooth bezel and one engine-turned, at the same price and on the same platform. Watch-Wiki tabulates the decorative-bezel column across three generations: the 14010 against the 14000, the 14010M against the 14000M, and the 114210 against the 114200. ~~Gray & Sons records~~ the ~~same pairing at~~ the ~~2000 launch of the 14000M and 14010M~~, ~~and adds~~ the 114234 ~~with~~ its white-gold fluted bezel as the ~~third bezel option once the 2007 generation arrives~~.

Rolex built the modern Air-King in matched pairs, one smooth bezel and one engine-turned, at the same price and on the same platform. Watch-Wiki tabulates the decorative-bezel column across three generations: the 14010 against the 14000, the 14010M against the 14000M, and the 114210 against the 114200. Erik Slaven adds the third bezel option that arrives with the 2007 generation, the 114234 and its white-gold fluted bezel, borrowed from the Datejust.

The 14010M is the least eventful reference in that sequence, and that is the point of it. Ross Povey, writing in Revolution, compresses the whole change into a sentence: Rolex updated the movement to Cal. 3130 and suffixed an M to the 14000 and the 14010. Nothing else in the watch moves. The case is the 14010's, the bezel pattern is the 14010's, the bracelet is the 14010's, and the dial catalogue is the 14010's. What a buyer gets for choosing the M over the 14010 is a newer movement in an otherwise identical watch.

Line 93:

==Production outline==

Erik Slaven at Monochrome and Marcus Siems both give the 14010M as 2000 to 2006, launching alongside the 14000M and retiring the year before the 114200 generation. Watch-Wiki ~~and Gray & Sons read~~ 2000 to 2007, which conflates the production end with the successor's launch rather than describing parallel shipping. Ross Povey puts the M cutover a year later still, at 2001.

Erik Slaven at Monochrome and Marcus Siems both give the 14010M as 2000 to 2006, launching alongside the 14000M and retiring the year before the 114200 generation. Watch-Wiki reads 2000 to 2007, which conflates the production end with the successor's launch rather than describing parallel shipping. Ross Povey puts the M cutover a year later still, at 2001.

Dated examples in the dealer market sit comfortably inside all three readings without resolving them: documented 14010Ms run from 2001 through 2002, and a 2001-dated 14010 without the suffix turns up in the same inventory. Two references on sale in the same year is what a catalogue handover looks like from the retail end, and it explains why the reference maps disagree by a season in both directions.

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 |-
 | production
-| 2000/01–2006; Monochrome and Marcus Siems read 2000–2006, Watch-Wiki and Gray & Sons 2000–2007, Ross Povey puts the M cutover at 2001
+| 2000/01–2006; Monochrome and Marcus Siems read 2000–2006, Watch-Wiki 2000–2007, Ross Povey puts the M cutover at 2001
 |-
 | case
@@ Line 85: / Line 85: @@
 ==Where it sits in the line==
-Rolex built the modern Air-King in matched pairs, one smooth bezel and one engine-turned, at the same price and on the same platform. Watch-Wiki tabulates the decorative-bezel column across three generations: the 14010 against the 14000, the 14010M against the 14000M, and the 114210 against the 114200. Gray & Sons records the same pairing at the 2000 launch of the 14000M and 14010M, and adds the 114234 with its white-gold fluted bezel as the third bezel option once the 2007 generation arrives.
+Rolex built the modern Air-King in matched pairs, one smooth bezel and one engine-turned, at the same price and on the same platform. Watch-Wiki tabulates the decorative-bezel column across three generations: the 14010 against the 14000, the 14010M against the 14000M, and the 114210 against the 114200. Erik Slaven adds the third bezel option that arrives with the 2007 generation, the 114234 and its white-gold fluted bezel, borrowed from the Datejust.
 The 14010M is the least eventful reference in that sequence, and that is the point of it. Ross Povey, writing in Revolution, compresses the whole change into a sentence: Rolex updated the movement to Cal. 3130 and suffixed an M to the 14000 and the 14010. Nothing else in the watch moves. The case is the 14010's, the bezel pattern is the 14010's, the bracelet is the 14010's, and the dial catalogue is the 14010's. What a buyer gets for choosing the M over the 14010 is a newer movement in an otherwise identical watch.
@@ Line 93: / Line 93: @@
 ==Production outline==
-Erik Slaven at Monochrome and Marcus Siems both give the 14010M as 2000 to 2006, launching alongside the 14000M and retiring the year before the 114200 generation. Watch-Wiki and Gray & Sons read 2000 to 2007, which conflates the production end with the successor's launch rather than describing parallel shipping. Ross Povey puts the M cutover a year later still, at 2001.
+Erik Slaven at Monochrome and Marcus Siems both give the 14010M as 2000 to 2006, launching alongside the 14000M and retiring the year before the 114200 generation. Watch-Wiki reads 2000 to 2007, which conflates the production end with the successor's launch rather than describing parallel shipping. Ross Povey puts the M cutover a year later still, at 2001.
 Dated examples in the dealer market sit comfortably inside all three readings without resolving them: documented 14010Ms run from 2001 through 2002, and a 2001-dated 14010 without the suffix turns up in the same inventory. Two references on sale in the same year is what a catalogue handover looks like from the retail end, and it explains why the reference maps disagree by a season in both directions.