Reference:Movements: Difference between revisions

[checked revision][checked revision]
Add object-level Cal. 59 and Extra Prima attributions for 3351
Clarify conflicting Cal. 740 attributions for refs. 6094 and 4467
Line 785: Line 785:
Antiquorum gives 26 jewels for its Cal. 740 example. That count should be kept with the source's description. A different count in a reference table may reflect a counting convention or a different execution; the number alone does not settle which.
Antiquorum gives 26 jewels for its Cal. 740 example. That count should be kept with the source's description. A different count in a reference table may reflect a counting convention or a different execution; the number alone does not settle which.


Antiquorum also assigns Cal. 740 to manual-wind [[Reference:6094|ref. 6094]], usually with 17 jewels. Its 2008 lot labels the case 6094/6294; the 2010 and 2012 lots identify ref. 6094 alone. The 2018 listing for case 882812 calls the watch self-winding in its headline while the specification field gives Cal. 740. Keep these as lot-level attributions: the records do not establish that the 6094 Cal. 740 is the automatic 26-jewel movement documented here for ref. 4467. [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-203-530 Antiquorum, lot 530]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-242-134 Antiquorum, lot 134]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-ref-6094-tropical-lot-262-291 Antiquorum, lot 291]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-ref-6094-oysterdate-precision-lot-313-138 Antiquorum, lot 138].
Antiquorum also assigns Cal. 740 to manual-wind [[Reference:6094|ref. 6094]], usually with 17 jewels. Its 2008 lot labels the case 6094/6294; the 2010 and 2012 lots identify ref. 6094 alone. The 2018 listing for case 882812 calls the watch self-winding in its headline while the specification field gives Cal. 740. Watch-Wiki lists Cal. 740 as an automatic 18-jewel Datejust movement; Antiquorum describes the ref. 4467 Cal. 740 documented here as automatic with 26 jewels. These records use Cal. 740 for different movement descriptions. A separate 6094 photograph shows Rolex and 17 jewels, but no legible caliber stamp; it cannot confirm the auction attribution. [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-203-530 Antiquorum, lot 530]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-lot-242-134 Antiquorum, lot 134]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-ref-6094-tropical-lot-262-291 Antiquorum, lot 291]; [https://catalog.antiquorum.swiss/en/lots/rolex-ref-6094-oysterdate-precision-lot-313-138 Antiquorum, lot 138]; [https://everywatch.com/rolex/oysterdate-precision/6094/watch-12440774 EveryWatch transcription of Bonhams, lot 85]; [https://www.hashtagwatchco.com/products/1953-rolex-oysterdate-precision-6094-white-red-date-stainless-steel-manual-wristwatch HASHTAGWATCHCO, ref. 6094 listing photographs]; [https://www.watch-wiki.net/doku.php?id=rolex_calibres Watch-Wiki, Rolex calibre index].


Surviving examples can have replacement movements or parts. A reference launch date should not be assigned automatically to the movement now inside a particular case.
Surviving examples can have replacement movements or parts. A reference launch date should not be assigned automatically to the movement now inside a particular case.