Reference:16760: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Strip auction prices/hammer wording from intros and prose body per CLAUDE.md hard rule #10 + user feedback. Auction record stays in dedicated section. Replace "hammered at"→"sold for" / "hammer"→"sale" in remaining prose. |
Slop Cop scrub: strip represents/serves as/stands as/constitutes/encompasses, establishes, reflects, fundamentally, completely different/distinct, pivotal, robust, essentially, AI section-title patterns + transitional connectives. Per CLAUDE.md WRITING_STYLE.md banlist + user feedback on AI cadence. |
||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
[[File:Ref 16760 coke-bobs.webp|thumb|right|280px|alt=Coke 16760|Coke 16760]] | [[File:Ref 16760 coke-bobs.webp|thumb|right|280px|alt=Coke 16760|Coke 16760]] | ||
Two consistent threads across the surveyed corpus. The 16760 was always fitted with a glossy lacquer dial with applied white-gold-surround indices from launch — Specialist registries are explicit, and no matte 16760 dial is recognized as factory. The rolexforums "Matte Dial on a 16760?" thread | Two consistent threads across the surveyed corpus. The 16760 was always fitted with a glossy lacquer dial with applied white-gold-surround indices from launch — Specialist registries are explicit, and no matte 16760 dial is recognized as factory. The rolexforums "Matte Dial on a 16760?" thread shows collector skepticism toward any matte example. Mark distinctions for the 16760 are weaker than for earlier GMT references; most sources collapse to "Mark 1 / spider" vs "later glossy intact." | ||
<span id="standard-glossy-dial"></span> | <span id="standard-glossy-dial"></span> | ||