Reference:971: Difference between revisions
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
SEO: clickable title + og:image + timestamps |
Rule 5: strip dealer names from the Brancard-nickname paragraph (Beckertime, Everest Bands) — contradiction preserved, re-attributed to the dealer trade; dealer links retained in Sources |
||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
==The Brancard nickname — 971 versus 1490== | ==The Brancard nickname — 971 versus 1490== | ||
Auction houses today apply "Brancard" to both the 971 and the 1490. Friedberg's 2001 TimeZone article assigns the nickname specifically to the 971: ''"the especially famous Prince Brancard (ref. 971)."'' Coronet Magazine's 2021 doctor's-watch piece follows Friedberg. Rolex Magazine | Auction houses today apply "Brancard" to both the 971 and the 1490. Friedberg's 2001 TimeZone article assigns the nickname specifically to the 971: ''"the especially famous Prince Brancard (ref. 971)."'' Coronet Magazine's 2021 doctor's-watch piece follows Friedberg. Rolex Magazine treats the 971 as the canonical Brancard, and so does part of the dealer trade. A 2023 dealer guide reverses the assignment, applying "Brancard" to the 1490 and omitting the 971 entirely. | ||
The reconciliation most consistent with published evidence: 971 is the original Brancard — the 1928 launch reference of the flared stretcher case shape — and the 1490 is the larger evolution of the same case form from the early 1930s onward. Both qualify as Brancard cases. The nickname attaches most strongly to the 971 in early-2000s collector writing — Friedberg's TimeZone piece is the load-bearing source — and to the 1490 in modern auction-catalog convention, because the 1490 has more surfaced examples and dominates current market activity. | The reconciliation most consistent with published evidence: 971 is the original Brancard — the 1928 launch reference of the flared stretcher case shape — and the 1490 is the larger evolution of the same case form from the early 1930s onward. Both qualify as Brancard cases. The nickname attaches most strongly to the 971 in early-2000s collector writing — Friedberg's TimeZone piece is the load-bearing source — and to the 1490 in modern auction-catalog convention, because the 1490 has more surfaced examples and dominates current market activity. | ||