Reference:1862: Difference between revisions

[checked revision][checked revision]
Text audit: voice, clarity — cut four negation-pivot constructions in narrative prose (no fact changes)
Fix T.S. 300 ligne error (7¾→7½) and rework caliber-number claims per Reference:Movements factory-table cross-check: 527/579/841/1004/1759 are almost certainly plate serials not calibers, and Cal. 414/701 have no documented Prince connection
Line 2: Line 2:
{{#seo:
{{#seo:
|title=Rolex Prince 1862 (1928–1942) — Production & Dial Guide | Rolexopedia
|title=Rolex Prince 1862 (1928–1942) — Production & Dial Guide | Rolexopedia
|description=The Rolex Prince Classic 1862 is the straight-sided rectangular Prince that runs concurrent with the flared Brancards 971 and 1490. Aegler shaped chronometer movements (Cal. 300 family plus 414, 527, 579, 701, 841, 1004, 1759 commercial designations) in Prima, Extra Prima, and Ultra Prima grades. Documented in stainless steel, 9K/18K gold, two-tone, bicolor, and platinum + 9K composite. Production approximately 1928–1942.
|description=The Rolex Prince Classic 1862 is the straight-sided rectangular Prince that runs concurrent with the flared Brancards 971 and 1490. Aegler shaped chronometer movement, Cal. 300 / T.S. 300 family (7½ ligne), with several catalogue-printed movement numbers (527, 579, 841, 1004, 1759) that are most likely plate serials rather than distinct calibers, in Prima, Extra Prima, and Ultra Prima grades. Documented in stainless steel, 9K/18K gold, two-tone, bicolor, and platinum + 9K composite. Production approximately 1928–1942.
|keywords=Rolex, Prince, 1862, 1862A, Classic, Doctor's Watch, Aegler, Cal. 300, Cal. 527, Cal. 1004, Cal. 1759, Ultra Prima, Extra Prima, Glasgow hallmark, vintage, Art Deco, reference guide
|keywords=Rolex, Prince, 1862, 1862A, Classic, Doctor's Watch, Aegler, Cal. 300, T.S. 300, Ultra Prima, Extra Prima, Glasgow hallmark, vintage, Art Deco, reference guide
|image=Ref 1862 hero.webp
|image=Ref 1862 hero.webp
|image_alt=Rolex Prince Classic 1862 9K gold Glasgow 1934 Cal. 527
|image_alt=Rolex Prince Classic 1862 9K gold Glasgow 1934 Cal. 527
Line 60: Line 60:
|-
|-
| movement family
| movement family
| Aegler shaped: Cal. 300 / Cal. 350 / Cal. 7¾′′′ T.S. 300 / Cal. 360 HW (rectangular plates 1928–1935; tonneau plates 1936-onward)
| Aegler shaped: Cal. 300 / Cal. 350 / Cal. 7½′′′ T.S. 300 / Cal. 360 HW (rectangular plates 1928–1935; tonneau plates 1936-onward)
|-
|-
| caliber-number variants documented on 1862 cases
| caliber-number variants documented on 1862 cases
| 300, 414, 527, 579 T, 701, 841 T, 1004 (8-position chronometer), 1759 Ultra Prima Chronometer, plus Cal. 7½′′′ Extra Prima with Elinvar hairspring (Antiquorum 2022)
| Cal. 300 / T.S. 300 base family (7½′′′); auction catalogues also print 527, 579, 841, and 1004 off the movement plate, and a single 1759 — almost certainly movement serial numbers rather than distinct calibers, per [[Reference:Movements]]. Cal. 414 (one dealer listing) and Cal. 701 (one uncatalogued photograph) have no documented Prince connection at all
|-
|-
| movement grades
| movement grades
Line 127: Line 127:
The 1862 runs on the same Aegler shaped-movement family as the 971 and 1490. The 1927 Wilsdorf-Aegler patent that placed the winding barrel and balance at opposite ends of the rectangular movement applies. The Aegler-Rolex relationship was a supplier arrangement (Aegler operated independently in Bienne until Rolex purchased the firm from the Borer family in April 2004, per Tim Mosso's Quill & Pad reporting).
The 1862 runs on the same Aegler shaped-movement family as the 971 and 1490. The 1927 Wilsdorf-Aegler patent that placed the winding barrel and balance at opposite ends of the rectangular movement applies. The Aegler-Rolex relationship was a supplier arrangement (Aegler operated independently in Bienne until Rolex purchased the firm from the Borer family in April 2004, per Tim Mosso's Quill & Pad reporting).


What sets the 1862's movement record apart is the spread of caliber numbers stamped on its bridges. The documented examples cover at least eight distinct numbered calibers in 1862 cases: 300, 414, 527 (Christie's online c.1934), 579 T (documented example), 701, 841 T (Bonhams 2022), 1004 (Christie's London 2015, "officially tested in 8 positions"), and 1759 (watch-auctions.co.uk 1937, Ultra Prima Chronometer 18-jewel 6-position). A ninth attribution, Cal. 7½′′′ Extra Prima with Elinvar hairspring (Antiquorum 2022), describes the same architecture by ligne size and grade rather than caliber number.
What sets the 1862's movement record apart is the spread of numbers stamped on its bridges. Auction catalogues have printed 527 (Christie's online, c.1934), 579 (Bonhams London, c.1935), 841 (Bonhams London, c.1930, resold through Tajan in 2019), 1004 (Christie's London, 2015, Glasgow import 1936, "officially tested in 8 positions"), and a single 1759 (watch-auctions.co.uk, 1937, Ultra Prima Chronometer, 18-jewel, 6-position) as though each were a distinct Rolex caliber. Cross-checked against Rolex's own factory caliber table on [[Reference:Movements]], these are almost certainly movement serial numbers read off the plate rather than genuine commercial designations — Continental houses cataloguing the same movement class instead cite the grade and the "T.S." size code. Cal. 414, which surfaces on a single Italian dealer listing, and Cal. 701, which rests on one uncatalogued photograph elsewhere in the Prince family, have no documented connection to the Rolex Prince at all and should not be read as confirmed 1862 variants. The base architecture behind all of these stampings is the Cal. 300 / T.S. 300 family — 7½′′′, rectangular plates, produced 1928–1935 — and the Antiquorum-catalogued "Cal. 7½′′′ Extra Prima with Elinvar hairspring" (2022) describes that same movement by ligne size and grade rather than by number.


The auction-house labeling is not uniform. The same architectural specification (18-jewel, 6-position, Ultra Prima Chronometer) appears under different caliber numbers across different houses: Cal. 300 Ultra Prima at Robert Maron, Cal. 1759 Ultra Prima Chronometer at watch-auctions.co.uk. Whether these are genuinely distinct sub-calibers or auction-cataloguing drift on the same underlying movement is unsettled in the published record. The most defensible reading is that the Cal. 300 family runs from 1928–1937 with rectangular plates and that the higher caliber numbers (700-series, 1000-series, 1759) are commercial designations applied to the 1936-onward tonneau-plate generation under different finishing grades. The NAWCC discussion (Doug Sinclair, gmorse, Cary Hurt, March 2013) is the load-bearing source for the rectangular-plate versus tonneau-plate cutoff, regardless of the caliber number.
The most defensible reading, consistent with the Reference:Movements analysis, is that the rectangular-plate Cal. 300 / T.S. 300 family runs 1928–1937 and that the various three- and four-digit numbers UK catalogues print on later 1862 movements are plate serials rather than a family of commercial calibers succeeding it. The NAWCC discussion (Doug Sinclair, gmorse, Cary Hurt, March 2013) remains the load-bearing source for the rectangular-plate versus tonneau-plate cutoff, regardless of what number happens to be stamped on any individual movement.


Movement grading runs Prima → Extra Prima → Ultra Prima. The "Chronometer" or "Officially Certified Chronometer" designation on the dial corresponds to Extra Prima or Ultra Prima grade. A Prima movement does not earn the dial mark. The Christie's London 2015 example with Cal. 1004 carries an "officially tested in 8 positions" rating — eight-position adjustment is unusual (Swiss and Kew chronometer protocols of the period typically tested in 5 or 6 positions), and the 8-position attribution may indicate a specific Aegler-internal regulation tier rather than a Bureaux-Officiels-Suisse-de-Contrôle certification.
Movement grading runs Prima → Extra Prima → Ultra Prima. The "Chronometer" or "Officially Certified Chronometer" designation on the dial corresponds to Extra Prima or Ultra Prima grade. A Prima movement does not earn the dial mark. The Christie's London 2015 example, catalogued with the number 1004 on its movement, carries an "officially tested in 8 positions" rating — eight-position adjustment is unusual (Swiss and Kew chronometer protocols of the period typically tested in 5 or 6 positions), and the 8-position attribution may indicate a specific Aegler-internal regulation tier rather than a Bureaux-Officiels-Suisse-de-Contrôle certification.


==The duo-dial and the doctor's watch==
==The duo-dial and the doctor's watch==